The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The implementation factors that influence the ERP (enterprise resource planning) benefits
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Organizational culture and leadership
(1993) · Long Range Planning · doi:10.1016/0024-6301(93)90120-5 · Cited by 16,462
Modern Methods for Business Research
(1998) · doi:10.4324/9781410604385 · Cited by 6,534
Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148781 · Cited by 3,921
Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development
Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.2.269.18845 · Cited by 3,748
Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system.
Davenport, T. H. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 3,335
Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion Approach
Cooper, R. B., & Zmud, R. W. (1990) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.2.123 · Cited by 2,765
The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective
Hong, K.-K., & Kim, Y.-G. (2002) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00134-3 · Cited by 1,167
Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation
Barua, A., Kriebel, C. H., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.1.3 · Cited by 1,131
How Do Suppliers Benefit from Information Technology Use in Supply Chain Relationships?1
Subramani, M. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148624 · Cited by 1,101
Cited by
Assessing Common Method Bias: Problems with the ULMC Technique1
Chin, W. W., Thatcher, J. B., & Wright, R. T. (2012) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/41703491 · Cited by 505
Innovating with enterprise systems and digital platforms: A contingent resource-based theory view
Sedera, D., Lokuge, S., Grover, V., Sarker, S., & Sarker, S. (2016) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.01.001 · Cited by 246
ERP system implementation in large enterprises—A systematic literature review
Ali, M., & Miller, L. (2017) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-07-2014-0071 · Cited by 221
Key criteria influencing the choice of Arctic shipping: a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process model
Tseng, P.-H., & Cullinane, K. (2018) · Maritime Policy & Management · doi:10.1080/03088839.2018.1443225 · Cited by 88
Butarbutar, Z. T., Handayani, P. W., Suryono, R. R., & Wibowo, W. S. (2023) · Cogent Business & Management · doi:10.1080/23311975.2023.2264001 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Chou, S.-W., & Chang, Y.-C.
- Venue
- Decision Support Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 149-157
- ISSN
- 0167-9236 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2014386950
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 20.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The implementation factors that influence the ERP (enterprise resource planning) benefits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.dss.2008.06.003
- The paper
- Chou, S.-W., & Chang, Y.-C. (2008). The implementation factors that influence the ERP (enterprise resource planning) benefits. Decision Support Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2008.06.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
