The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations
Orlikowski, W. J. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.398 · Cited by 4,957
Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations
Henderson, J. C., & Venkatraman, H. (1999) · IBM Systems Journal · doi:10.1147/sj.1999.5387096 · Cited by 3,498
Information Technology and Organizational Change: Causal Structure in Theory and Research
Markus, M. L., & Robey, D. (1988) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.34.5.583 · Cited by 2,108
Enterprise resource planning: cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution?
Soh, C., Kien, S. S., & Tay-Yap, J. (2000) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/332051.332070 · Cited by 686
Enterprise resource planning: introduction
Kumar, K., & van Hillegersberg, J. (2000) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/332051.332063 · Cited by 372
An Assessment of the Contingency Theory of Management Information Systems
Weill, P., & Olson, M. H. (1989) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.1989.11517849 · Cited by 351
Enterprise resource planning: ERP adoption by European midsize companies
van Everdingen, Y., van Hillegersberg, J., & Waarts, E. (2000) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/332051.332064 · Cited by 322
User resistance and strategies for promoting acceptance across system types
Jiang, J. J., Muhanna, W. A., & Klein, G. (2000) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(99)00032-4 · Cited by 265
Research works printed but not linked: 34
- N.H. Bancroft, H. Seip, A. Sprengel, Implementing SAP R/3, 2nd Edition, Manning Publications, Greenwich, CT, 1998.
- P. Bingi, M.K. Sharma, J.K. Golda, Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation, Information Systems Management (1999) 7–14. · DOI · Paper page
- L. Brehm, A. Heinzl, M.L. Markus, Tailoring ERP systems: a spectrum of choices and their implications, in: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January, 2001. · DOI · Paper page
- Cooper, 1990, Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach, Management Science, 36, 123, 10.1287/mnsc.36.2.123 · DOI · Paper page
- T.H. Davenport, Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system, Harvard Business Review (1998) 121–131.
- T.H. Davenport, Mission Critical: Realizing the Promise of Enterprise Systems, HBS Press, 2000.
- G.B. Davis, M.H. Olson, Management Information Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1985.
- T.F. Gattiker, D.L. Goodhue, Understanding the plant level cost and benefits of ERP: will the ugly duckling always turn into a swan?, in: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2000. · DOI
- R.L. Glass, Enterprise resource planning—breakthrough and/or term problem? Database 29 (2) (1998) 14–16. · DOI · Paper page
- Gremillion, 1983, Breaking the system development bottleneck, Harvard Business Review, 61, 130
- Gross, 1984, Barriers to the adaptation of application software packages, Systems, Objectives, Solutions, 4, 211
- Grover, 1995, The implementation of business process reengineering, Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 109, 10.1080/07421222.1995.11518072 · DOI · Paper page
- M. Hammer, S. Stanton, How processes enterprise really work, Harvard Business Review (1999) 108–118.
- C.P. Holland, B. Light, A critical success factors model for ERP implementation, IEEE Software (1999) 30–36. · DOI · Paper page
- Iivari, 1992, The organizational fit of information systems, Journal of Information Systems, 2, 3, 10.1111/j.1365-2575.1992.tb00064.x · DOI
- Kanellis, 1999, Evaluating business information systems fit: from concept to practical application, European Journal of Information Systems, 8, 65, 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000316 · DOI
- S.P. Laughlin, An ERP game plan, Journal of Business Strategy (1999) 32–37. · DOI · Paper page
- Leonard-Barton, 1988, Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization, Research Policy, 17, 251, 10.1016/0048-7333(88)90006-6 · DOI · Paper page
- H.C. Lucas, E.J. Walton, M.J. Ginzberg, Implementing packaged software, MIS Quarterly (1988) 537–549. · DOI · Paper page
- Lynch, 1984, Implementing packaged application software: hidden costs and new challenges, Systems, Objectives, Solutions, 4, 227
- Markus, 1983, Power, politics, and MIS implementation, Communications of the ACM, 26, 430, 10.1145/358141.358148 · DOI · Paper page
- Markus, 1983, The organizational validity of management information systems, Human Relations, 36, 203, 10.1177/001872678303600301 · DOI · Paper page
- M.L. Markus, C. Tanis, The enterprise systems experience—from adoption to success, in: R.W. Zmud (Ed.), Framing the Domains of IT Research: Glimpsing the Future Through the Past, Pinnaflex Educational Resources Inc., Cincinnati, OH, 2000, pp. 173–207.
- C.F. Nachmias, D. Nachmias, Research Method in the Social Sciences, St. Martin Press, New York, 2000.
- Pereira, 1999, Resource view theory analysis of SAP as a source of competitive advantage for firms, Database, 30, 38
- E. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovation, Free Press, New York, 1995.
- Schoonhoven, 1981, Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency theory, Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 349, 10.2307/2392512 · DOI · Paper page
- Sharma, 1981, Identification and analysis of moderator variables, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 291, 10.2307/3150970 · DOI · Paper page
- Scott, 2000, Enhancing functionality in an enterprise software package, Information and Management, 37, 111, 10.1016/S0378-7206(99)00040-3 · DOI
- D.W. Straub, Validating instruments in MIS research, MIS Quarterly (1989) 147–169. · DOI · Paper page
- Swan, 1999, The illusion of ‘best practice’ in information systems for operations management, European Journal of Information Systems, 8, 284, 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000336 · DOI
- Tyre, 1994, Windows of opportunity: temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations, Organization Science, 5, 98, 10.1287/orsc.5.1.98 · DOI · Paper page
- O. Volkoff, Enterprise system implementation: a process of individual metamorphosis, American Conference on Information Systems, 1999.
- O. Volkoff, Using the structurational model of technology to analyze an ERP implementation, in: Proceedings of Academy of Management ’99 Conference, 1999.
Cited by
Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., & Espadanal, M. (2014) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.03.006 · Cited by 1,255
Gattiker, T. F., & Goodhue, D. L. (2005) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148695 · Cited by 642
Risk management in ERP project introduction: Review of the literature
Aloini, D., Dulmin, R., & Mininno, V. (2007) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2007.05.004 · Cited by 423
Pan, M.-J., & Jang, W.-Y. (2008) · Journal of Computer Information Systems · doi:10.1080/08874417.2008.11646025 · Cited by 410
Enterprise systems and ongoing process change
Davenport, T. H., Harris, J. G., & Cantrell, S. (2004) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/14637150410518301 · Cited by 354
Metadata
- Authors
- Hong, K.-K., & Kim, Y.-G.
- Venue
- Information & Management
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-40
- ISSN
- 0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073912395
- Cited by
- 1,167
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 68.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00134-3
- The paper
- Hong, K.-K., & Kim, Y.-G. (2002). The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective. Information & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00134-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.