Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,167

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective

Hong, Kyung-Kwon, Kim, Young-Gul·2002·Information & Management

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00134-3

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. N.H. Bancroft, H. Seip, A. Sprengel, Implementing SAP R/3, 2nd Edition, Manning Publications, Greenwich, CT, 1998.
  2. P. Bingi, M.K. Sharma, J.K. Golda, Critical issues affecting an ERP implementation, Information Systems Management (1999) 7–14. · DOI · Paper page
  3. L. Brehm, A. Heinzl, M.L. Markus, Tailoring ERP systems: a spectrum of choices and their implications, in: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January, 2001. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Cooper, 1990, Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach, Management Science, 36, 123, 10.1287/mnsc.36.2.123 · DOI · Paper page
  5. T.H. Davenport, Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system, Harvard Business Review (1998) 121–131.
  6. T.H. Davenport, Mission Critical: Realizing the Promise of Enterprise Systems, HBS Press, 2000.
  7. G.B. Davis, M.H. Olson, Management Information Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1985.
  8. T.F. Gattiker, D.L. Goodhue, Understanding the plant level cost and benefits of ERP: will the ugly duckling always turn into a swan?, in: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2000. · DOI
  9. R.L. Glass, Enterprise resource planning—breakthrough and/or term problem? Database 29 (2) (1998) 14–16. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Gremillion, 1983, Breaking the system development bottleneck, Harvard Business Review, 61, 130
  11. Gross, 1984, Barriers to the adaptation of application software packages, Systems, Objectives, Solutions, 4, 211
  12. Grover, 1995, The implementation of business process reengineering, Journal of Management Information Systems, 12, 109, 10.1080/07421222.1995.11518072 · DOI · Paper page
  13. M. Hammer, S. Stanton, How processes enterprise really work, Harvard Business Review (1999) 108–118.
  14. C.P. Holland, B. Light, A critical success factors model for ERP implementation, IEEE Software (1999) 30–36. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Iivari, 1992, The organizational fit of information systems, Journal of Information Systems, 2, 3, 10.1111/j.1365-2575.1992.tb00064.x · DOI
  16. Kanellis, 1999, Evaluating business information systems fit: from concept to practical application, European Journal of Information Systems, 8, 65, 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000316 · DOI
  17. S.P. Laughlin, An ERP game plan, Journal of Business Strategy (1999) 32–37. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Leonard-Barton, 1988, Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization, Research Policy, 17, 251, 10.1016/0048-7333(88)90006-6 · DOI · Paper page
  19. H.C. Lucas, E.J. Walton, M.J. Ginzberg, Implementing packaged software, MIS Quarterly (1988) 537–549. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Lynch, 1984, Implementing packaged application software: hidden costs and new challenges, Systems, Objectives, Solutions, 4, 227
  21. Markus, 1983, Power, politics, and MIS implementation, Communications of the ACM, 26, 430, 10.1145/358141.358148 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Markus, 1983, The organizational validity of management information systems, Human Relations, 36, 203, 10.1177/001872678303600301 · DOI · Paper page
  23. M.L. Markus, C. Tanis, The enterprise systems experience—from adoption to success, in: R.W. Zmud (Ed.), Framing the Domains of IT Research: Glimpsing the Future Through the Past, Pinnaflex Educational Resources Inc., Cincinnati, OH, 2000, pp. 173–207.
  24. C.F. Nachmias, D. Nachmias, Research Method in the Social Sciences, St. Martin Press, New York, 2000.
  25. Pereira, 1999, Resource view theory analysis of SAP as a source of competitive advantage for firms, Database, 30, 38
  26. E. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovation, Free Press, New York, 1995.
  27. Schoonhoven, 1981, Problems with contingency theory: testing assumptions hidden within the language of contingency theory, Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 349, 10.2307/2392512 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Sharma, 1981, Identification and analysis of moderator variables, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 291, 10.2307/3150970 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Scott, 2000, Enhancing functionality in an enterprise software package, Information and Management, 37, 111, 10.1016/S0378-7206(99)00040-3 · DOI
  30. D.W. Straub, Validating instruments in MIS research, MIS Quarterly (1989) 147–169. · DOI · Paper page
  31. Swan, 1999, The illusion of ‘best practice’ in information systems for operations management, European Journal of Information Systems, 8, 284, 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000336 · DOI
  32. Tyre, 1994, Windows of opportunity: temporal patterns of technological adaptation in organizations, Organization Science, 5, 98, 10.1287/orsc.5.1.98 · DOI · Paper page
  33. O. Volkoff, Enterprise system implementation: a process of individual metamorphosis, American Conference on Information Systems, 1999.
  34. O. Volkoff, Using the structurational model of technology to analyze an ERP implementation, in: Proceedings of Academy of Management ’99 Conference, 1999.

Cited by

See all 1,167

Metadata

Authors
Hong, K.-K., & Kim, Y.-G.
Venue
Information & Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-10
Volume
40
Issue
1
Pages
25-40
ISSN
0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2073912395
Cited by
1,167
References
8
FWCI
68.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00134-3
The paper
Hong, K.-K., & Kim, Y.-G. (2002). The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective. Information & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00134-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.