The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Atmospheric microplastics: A review on current status and perspectives
Open accessAbstract
Microplastics have recently been detected in the atmosphere of urban, suburban, and even remote areas far away from source regions of microplastics, suggesting the potential long-distance atmospheric transport for microplastics. There still exist questions regarding the occurrence, fate, transport, and effect of atmospheric microplastics. These questions arise due to limited physical analysis and understanding of atmospheric microplastic pollution in conjunction with a lack of standardized sampling and identification methods. This paper reviews the current status of knowledge on atmospheric microplastics, the methods for sample collection, analysis and detection. We review and compare the methods used in the previous studies and provide recommendations for atmospheric microplastic sampling and measurement. Furthermore, we summarize the findings related to atmospheric microplastic characteristics, including abundance, size, shapes, colours, and polymer types. Microplastics occur in the atmosphere from urban to remote areas, with an abundance/deposition spanning 1–3 orders of magnitude across different sites. Fibres and fragments are the most frequently reported shapes and the types of plastic which generally aligns with world plastic demand. We conclude that atmospheric microplastics require further research and greater understanding to identify its global distributions and potential exposure to human health through further field sampling and implementation of standardized analytical protocols.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hidalgo-Ruz, V., Gutow, L., Thompson, R. C., & Thiel, M. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es2031505 · Cited by 5,440
Plastic and Human Health: A Micro Issue?
Wright, S. L., & Kelly, F. J. (2017) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b00423 · Cited by 3,413
Hartmann, N. B., Hüffer, T., Thompson, R. C., Hassellöv, M., Verschoor, A., Daugaard, A. E., Rist, S., Karlsson, T., Brennholt, N., Cole, M., et al. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b05297 · Cited by 2,881
Rethinking microplastics as a diverse contaminant suite
Rochman, C. M., Brookson, C., Bikker, J., Djuric, N., Earn, A., Bucci, K., Athey, S., Huntington, A., McIlwraith, H., Munno, K., et al. (2019) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.4371 · Cited by 1,258
Emergence of Nanoplastic in the Environment and Possible Impact on Human Health
Lehner, R., Weder, C., Petri-Fink, A., & Rothen-Rutishauser, B. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b05512 · Cited by 1,242
Fries, E., Dekiff, J. H., Willmeyer, J., Nuelle, M.-T., Ebert, M., & Remy, D. (2013) · Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts · doi:10.1039/c3em00214d · Cited by 926
Fate of nano- and microplastic in freshwater systems: A modeling study
Besseling, E., Quik, J. T. K., Sun, M., & Koelmans, A. A. (2017) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2016.10.001 · Cited by 919
Abbasi, S., Keshavarzi, B., Moore, F., Turner, A., Kelly, F. J., Dominguez, A. O., & Jaafarzadeh, N. (2019) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.039 · Cited by 770
Barboza, L. G. A., Vieira, L. R., Branco, V., Figueiredo, N., Carvalho, F., Carvalho, C., & Guilhermino, L. (2018) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2017.12.008 · Cited by 766 · cited 2×
“Currently, due to their inhalation and combination with other pollutants (mercury or PAHs), microplastics are thought to be an emergent component of air pollution (Barboza et al., 2018; Gasperi et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2019; Rochman et al., 2019; Tourinho et al., 2019; Wright and Kelly, 2017).”
BackgroundBisphenol A and Reproductive Health: Update of Experimental and Human Evidence, 2007–2013
Peretz, J., Vrooman, L., Ricke, W. A., Hunt, P. A., Ehrlich, S., Hauser, R., Padmanabhan, V., Taylor, H. S., Swan, S. H., VandeVoort, C. A., et al. (2014) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1307728 · Cited by 555
Analytical methodologies for monitoring micro(nano)plastics: Which are fit for purpose?
Renner, G., Schmidt, T. C., & Schram, J. (2018) · Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health · doi:10.1016/j.coesh.2017.11.001 · Cited by 290
Cited by
Kumar, R., Verma, A., Shome, A., Sinha, R., Sinha, S., Jha, P. K., Kumar, R., Kumar, P., Shubham, Das, S., et al. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13179963 · Cited by 1,111
Adsorption behavior of organic pollutants on microplastics
Fu, L., Li, J., Wang, G., Luan, Y., & Dai, W. (2021) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112207 · Cited by 932
Microplastics in human food chains: Food becoming a threat to health safety
Mamun, A. A., Prasetya, T. A. E., Dewi, I. R., & Ahmad, M. (2023) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159834 · Cited by 608
Microplastic pollution in soil and groundwater: a review
Chia, R. W., Lee, J.-Y., Kim, H., & Jang, J. (2021) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-021-01297-6 · Cited by 414
Micro(nano)plastics pollution and human health: How plastics can induce carcinogenesis to humans?
Kumar, R., Manna, C., Padha, S., Verma, A., Sharma, P., Dhar, A., Ghosh, A., & Bhattacharya, P. (2022) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134267 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Y., Kang, S., Allen, S., Allen, D., Gao, T., & Sillanpää, M.
- Venue
- Earth-Science Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 203
- Pages
- 103118
- ISSN
- 0012-8252 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3006187093
- Cited by
- 1,364
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 36.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
