Enhancing healthcare education: leveraging ChatGPT for innovative simulation scenarios
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
To nursing educators, ChatGPT can be useful in developing simulation scenarios, which could save them time.
“To nursing educators, ChatGPT can be useful in developing simulation scenarios, which could save them time (Vaughn et al., 2024)”
From Current trends and future implications in the utilization of ChatGPT in nursing: a rapid review (2024) · cites this paper as Vaughn et al., 2024
Other challenges include reporting outdated practices or guidelines or giving broad information or suggestions.
“reporting outdated practices or guidelines or giving broad information or suggestions (Vaughn et al., 2024).”
From Current trends and future implications in the utilization of ChatGPT in nursing: a rapid review (2024) · cites this paper as Vaughn et al., 2024
Among the few studies that exist on LLM-generated patient simulations, none have implemented feedback or debriefing at the time of reporting.
“Among the few studies that exist on LLM-generated patient simulations [ 21 – 24 ], none have implemented feedback or debriefing at the time of reporting.”
From Large language models improve clinical decision making of medical students through patient simulation and structured feedback: a randomized controlled trial (2024) · cites this paper as [24]
Cites
Cascella, M., Montomoli, J., Bellini, V., & Bignami, E. (2023) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-023-01925-4 · Cited by 1,120 · see citing works
Healthcare Simulation Dictionary
(2020) · Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US) eBooks · doi:10.23970/simulationv2 · Cited by 616 · see citing works
Ethical Considerations of Using ChatGPT in Health Care
Wang, C., Liu, S., Yang, H., Guo, J., Wu, Y., & Liu, J. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/48009 · Cited by 541 · see citing works
Simulation in Clinical Nursing Education
Κουκουρίκος, Κ., Tsaloglidou, A., Kourkouta, L. I., Papathanasiou, I. V., Iliadis, C., Frantzana, A. A., & Παναγιώτου, Α. (2021) · Acta Informatica Medica · doi:10.5455/aim.2021.29.15-20 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
ChatGPT: Is this version good for healthcare and research?
Vaishya, R., Misra, A., & Vaish, A. (2023) · Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2023.102744 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Onward and Upward: Introducing the Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best PracticeTM
Watts, P. I., Rossler, K. L., Bowler, F., Miller, C. W., Charnetski, M., Decker, S., Molloy, M. A., Persico, L., McMahon, E., McDermott, D. S., et al. (2021) · Clinical Simulation in Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.006 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
The Advent of Generative Language Models in Medical Education
Karabacak, M., Ozkara, B. B., Margetis, K., Wintermark, M., & Bisdas, S. (2023) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/48163 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Using chatbots like <scp>ChatGPT</scp> to support nursing practice
Scerri, A., & Morin, K. H. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.16677 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Impact of ChatGPT on Interdisciplinary Nursing Education and Research
Miao, H., & Ahn, H. (2023) · Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal · doi:10.2196/48136 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Using ChatGPT in Simulation Design: What Can (or Should) It Do for You?
Harder, N. (2023) · Clinical Simulation in Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2023.02.011 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Brügge, E., Ricchizzi, S., Arenbeck, M., Keller, M. N., Schur, L., Stummer, W., Holling, M., Lu, M. H., & Darici, D. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-06399-7 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Gunawan, J., Aungsuroch, Y., & Montayre, J. (2024) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106323 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Current trends and future implications in the utilization of ChatGPT in nursing: a rapid review
Kleib, M., Darko, E. M., Akingbade, O., Kennedy, M., Majekodunmi, P., Nickel, E., & Vogelsang, L. (2024) · International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances · doi:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100252 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Jacobs, C., Johnson, H., Tan, N., Brownlie, K., Joiner, R., & Thompson, T. (2025) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/70766 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Amankwaa, I., Ekpor, E., Cudjoe, D., Kobiah, E., Fuseini, A.-K. J., Diebieri, M., Gyamfi, S., & Brownie, S. (2025) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106822 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Generative artificial intelligence in healthcare simulation-based education: A scoping review
Neo, N. W. S., Gunawan, J., Levett-Jones, T., Khoo, E. T., Chua, W. L., & Liaw, S. Y. (2025) · Clinical Simulation in Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2025.101819 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Quantum leap in medical mentorship: exploring ChatGPT’s transition from textbooks to terabytes
Chokkakula, S., Chong, S., Yang, B., Jiang, H., Yu, J., Han, R., Attitalla, I. H., Yin, C., & Zhang, S. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1517981 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Yan, X., Wang, Z., Chen, O., & Guo, Y. (2026) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2026.107217 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vaughn, J., Ford, S. H., Scott, M., Jones, C., & Lewinski, A.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina Wilmington (US)
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Vaughn, Jacqueline
- Venue
- Clinical Simulation in Nursing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-02
- Volume
- 87
- Pages
- 101487
- ISSN
- 1876-1399 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4390021936
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 15
- FWCI
- 12.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Clinical Simulation in Nursing (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- US Department of Veterans Affairs (18-234)
- Health Services Research and Development
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, large language models, simulation scenario development, nursing education, simulation-based medical education, scenario realism, AI-generated educational content, faculty workload
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
