Cited by 113Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFluorine in Organic Chemistry

Perfluorinated compounds in surface waters of Shanghai, China: source analysis and risk assessment

Sun, Rui, Wu, Minghong, Tang, Liang, Li, Jiajun, Qian, Zhaoqiu, Han, Tao, Xu, Gang·2018·Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

Abstract

17 perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) were systematically investigated in the surface water from principal watersheds of Shanghai, China. 10 PFCs were above the detection limit (0.08-0.28ng/L) in 39 surface water samples. The perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorobutanesulfonate (PFBS) were the two dominant compounds with a median concentration 50.67ng/L and 29.84ng/L, respectively. Concentrations of perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) were generally less than PFBS, which might result from the global phase-out of PFOS production and the use of PFBS as a substitute for PFOS-based products. There were three major polluted areas of PFOA along the Huangpu River. The PFOA concentration in groundwater samples collected from one of the three areas indicated that chemical industry might be the possible source. The perfluoroalkane sulfonates (PFSAs) level had a spatial trend that indicated northwest had higher concentrations than the southeast. The distribution of PFCs was not much affected by atmospheric deposition. Mass loading analysis in the surface water revealed that the Huangpu River exhibited relatively large mass loading of total PFCs of 1742.43kg/year to Yangtze River Estuary. The predominant of the PFC species was PFOA with 652.65kg/year. The current concentrations of PFOA and PFOS were at middle level comparing to other studies in China and worldwide. Risk assessment of 6 PFCs showed that there is no risk to the aquatic organisms in Shanghai. PFOS and PFBS had low risk to th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.11.012

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sun, R., Wu, M., Tang, L., Li, J., Qian, Z., Han, T., & Xu, G.
Affiliations
Shanghai University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Tang, Liang
  • Xu, Gang
Venue
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-03
Volume
149
Pages
88-95
ISSN
0147-6513 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2779389787
Cited by
113
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (41373098, 41473090, 41430644, 11605111, 11675098, 41573096)
  • Innovative Research Team in University (IRT13078)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
Keywords
perfluorinated compounds, surface water contamination, perfluorooctanoic acid, PFBS, PFOS, source apportionment, mass loading, atmospheric deposition, Huangpu River, Yangtze River estuary, chemical industry pollution, avian exposure, Shanghai
MeSH terms
Caprylates, China, Environmental Monitoring, Fluorocarbons, Sulfonic Acids, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Risk Assessment, Rivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review