Cited by 117Sustainable Agricultural Systems AnalysisCocoa and Sweet Potato AgronomyOil Palm Production and Sustainability

Shaded coffee and cocoa – double dividend for biodiversity and small-scale farmers

Open access
Jezeer, Rosalien E., Verweij, Pita A., Santos, Maria J., Boot, René G.A.·2017·Ecological Economics

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.019

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Crop yield is not a comprehensive indicator of farm economic benefits, as operational costs, investment costs, market price and subsidies also have a significant influence on farm profitability.

    “Crop yield, however, is not a comprehensive indicator of farm economic benefits, as operational costs, investment costs, market price and subsidies also have a significant influence on farm profitability (Jezeer et al., 2018(Jezeer et al., , 2017;;Sgroi et al., 2015).”

    From Almond farm profitability under agroecological management in south-eastern Spain: Accounting for externalities and opportunity costs (2020) · cites this paper as Jezeer et al., 2017

    Section 4.2.3 (page unavailable) questions using yield as a direct indicator of financial performance, and Sections 3.1 and 4.2.4 discuss product prices and production and establishment costs. Section 4.2.1 says a premium price could improve profitability, but prices were held identical in the comparison; the cited passages do not establish a significant price effect or address subsidies. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Similar results (organic management lower yields but higher NPV) were found for Italian olive orchards and for coffee and cocoa.

    “Similar results were found for Italian olive orchards (Sgroi et al., 2015) and for coffee and cocoa (Jezeer et al., 2017).”

    From Almond farm profitability under agroecological management in south-eastern Spain: Accounting for externalities and opportunity costs (2020) · cites this paper as Jezeer et al., 2017

    Section 4.2.1 reports that shaded coffee and cocoa systems had yields averaging 26% lower than conventional systems, but higher net revenue and benefit–cost ratios. The paper evaluates shaded rather than uniformly organic management, and it does not report net present value (NPV); net revenue is not the same measure. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. ICC, 2014. World coffee trade (1963-2013): a review of the markets, challenges and op- portunities facing the sector. Review of the 112th International Coffee Council. Inter- national Coffee Organization, London, p.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jezeer, R. E., Verweij, P. A., Santos, M. J., & Boot, R. G. A.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Jezeer, Rosalien E.
Venue
Ecological Economics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
140
Pages
136-145
ISSN
0921-8009 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2613320175
Cited by
117
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 5
FWCI
4.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Ecological Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Hivos
  • Tropenbos International
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Horticulture › Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
Keywords
shaded coffee, smallholder farmers, biodiversity conservation, financial performance, cost efficiency, benefit-cost ratio, shade intensity, agroforestry, coffee yield, cocoa yield, scale-up

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review