Cited by 35Higher Education Research StudiesIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesLabor market dynamics and wage inequality

The impact of parental layoff on higher education investment

Pan, Weixiang, Ost, Ben·2014·Economics of Education Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.econedurev.2014.06.006

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pan, W., & Ost, B.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Ost, Ben
Venue
Economics of Education Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
42
Pages
53-63
ISSN
0272-7757 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984778560
Cited by
35
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3
FWCI
6.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Economics of Education Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Keywords
parental job loss, college enrollment, higher education investment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review