The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Integrated valuation of a nature-based solution for water pollution control. Highlighting hidden benefits
Open accessAbstract
In this study we assess multiple benefits (environmental, social and economic) provided by a multi-purpose green infrastructure (a series of constructed wetlands surrounded by a park) in a peri-urban area, and compare it with the alternative grey infrastructure and with the previous situation (a poplar plantation). We apply a multi-criteria analysis as a basis for integrated valuation. We address specific policy needs (strategic objectives) for the local territorial planning in the implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive. The analysis is used retrospectively ( ex post evaluation) but our results could also be used prospectively to appraise new proposals of constructed wetlands under similar circumstances. The results reflect that the green infrastructure performs equal or even better than the grey infrastructure alternative for water purification and flood protection, it has a similar cost, and it provides additional benefits (like wildlife support and recreation). The most preferred alternative is the green infrastructure, followed by the grey infrastructure and the poplar plantation. This study demonstrates (a) the effectiveness of investments on nature-based solutions, (b) the potential of green infrastructures for delivering a broad range of ecosystem services, and (c) the utility of integrating different value systems and stakeholders' viewpoints to support environmental decision-making.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process
Saaty, T. L., & Vargas, L. G. (2012) · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3597-6 · Cited by 2,210
Effectiveness of Green Infrastructure for Improvement of Air Quality in Urban Street Canyons
Pugh, T. A. M., MacKenzie, A. R., Whyatt, J. D., & Hewitt, C. N. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es300826w · Cited by 666
Cited by
Seddon, N., Chausson, A., Berry, P., Girardin, C. A. J., Smith, A., & Turner, B. (2020) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2019.0120 · Cited by 2,024
Assessing water ecosystem services for water resource management
Grizzetti, B., Lanzanova, D., Liquete, C., Reynaud, A., & Cardoso, A. C. (2016) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.008 · Cited by 580
Self-citationUrban greening through nature-based solutions – Key characteristics of an emerging concept
Dorst, H., van der Jagt, A., Raven, R., & Runhaar, H. (2019) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2019.101620 · Cited by 437
Nexus between nature-based solutions, ecosystem services and urban challenges
Babí Almenar, J., Elliot, T., Rugani, B., Philippe, B., Navarrete Gutierrez, T., Sonnemann, G., & Geneletti, D. (2021) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104898 · Cited by 378
Ershad Sarabi, S., Han, Q., L. Romme, A. G., de Vries, B., & Wendling, L. (2019) · Resources · doi:10.3390/resources8030121 · Cited by 319
Metadata
- Authors
- Liquete, C., Udias, A., Conte, G., Grizzetti, B., & Masi, F.
- Venue
- Ecosystem Services
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-12
- Volume
- 22
- Pages
- 392-401
- ISSN
- 2212-0416 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2528422939
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrated valuation of a nature-based solution for water pollution control. Highlighting hidden benefits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.011
- The paper
- Liquete, C., Udias, A., Conte, G., Grizzetti, B., & Masi, F. (2016). Integrated valuation of a nature-based solution for water pollution control. Highlighting hidden benefits. Ecosystem Services. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.09.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.