Patterns of Chinook salmon migration and residency in the Salmon River estuary (Oregon)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The dichotomy involving one habitat transition and one migration age is an over simplification of juvenile life history rearing and out-migration behavior, that has been described in few systems.
“However, this dichotomy involving one habitat transition and one migration age is an over simplification of juvenile life history rearing and out-migration behavior, that has been described in few systems [9, 10, 11].”
From Estimating Common Growth Patterns in Juvenile Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from Diverse Genetic Stocks and a Large Spatial Extent (2016) · cites this paper as [10]
Restoration efforts in the Salmon River estuary have shown that wetland recovery can expand life history variation by allowing a greater expression of estuarine-resident behaviors.
“Restoration efforts in the Salmon River estuary have shown that wetland recovery can expand life history variation by allowing a greater expression of estuarine-resident behaviors [10]”
From Estimating Common Growth Patterns in Juvenile Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from Diverse Genetic Stocks and a Large Spatial Extent (2016) · cites this paper as [10]
Juvenile salmon are known to move into restoring wetlands and shallow-water habitats at various life stages.
“Juvenile salmon are known to move into restoring wetlands and shallow-water habitats at various life stages (Thorpe 1994, Bottom et al. 2005, Roegner et al. 2010).”
From Evidence‐based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration (2016) · cites this paper as Bottom et al. 2005
The density of juvenile salmon in shallow-water habitats is a negative function of fish size.
“The density of juvenile salmon in shallow-water habitats is a function (negative relationship) of fish size (Bottom et al. 2005, Roegner et al. 2010, Sather et al. in press).”
From Evidence‐based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration (2016) · cites this paper as Bottom et al. 2005
Cites
JUVENILE PACIFIC SALMON IN ESTUARIES: THE LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEM
Healey, M. C. (1982) · Estuarine Comparisons · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-404070-0.50025-9 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Magnusson, A., & Hilborn, R. (2003) · Estuaries · doi:10.1007/bf02803366 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Levings, C. D., McAllister, C. D., & Chang, B. D. (1986) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f86-172 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Roegner, G. C., Dawley, E. W., Russell, M., Whiting, A., & Teel, D. J. (2010) · Transactions of the American Fisheries Society · doi:10.1577/t09-082.1 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Evidence‐based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration
Diefenderfer, H. L., Johnson, G. E., Thom, R. M., Buenau, K. E., Weitkamp, L. A., Woodley, C. M., Borde, A. B., & Kropp, R. K. (2016) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.1242 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Roegner, G. C., McNatt, R., Teel, D. J., & Bottom, D. L. (2012) · Marine and Coastal Fisheries · doi:10.1080/19425120.2012.675982 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“…of protracted use of shallow-water habitats by a variety of salmon species, stocks, and life history stages (Reimers 1973; Healey 1980, 1982; Levy and Northcote 1982; Levings et al. 1986, 1991; Levings 1994; Magnusson and Hilborn 2003; Bottom et al. 2005a; Hering et al. 2010; Roegner et al. 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationTeel, D. J., Baker, C., Kuligowski, D. R., Friesen, T. A., & Shields, B. (2009) · Transactions of the American Fisheries Society · doi:10.1577/t08-084.1 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Craig, B. E., Simenstad, C. A., & Bottom, D. L. (2014) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/jfb.12433 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Self-citationGoertler, P. A. L., Scheuerell, M. D., Simenstad, C. A., & Bottom, D. L. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162121 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Bottom, D. L., Jones, K. K., Cornwell, T. J., Gray, A., & Simenstad, C. A.
- Affiliations
- NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
- Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bottom, Daniel L.
- ORCID
- Bottom, Daniel L.
- Venue
- Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-07
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-93
- ISSN
- 0272-7714 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155482130
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
- Keywords
- Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, estuarine migration, wetland restoration, dikes, tidal marshes, winter survival, mark-recapture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
