The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“It is somewhat surprising that most studies that examine the effect of peer assessment tend to only assess the impact on the assessee and not the assessor (van Popta et al. 2017).”
From The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies (2020) · cites this paper as van Popta et al. 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“V an Popta et al. (2017) argue that the cognitive processes involved in peer assessment, such as evaluating, explaining, and suggesting, similarly play out in online and offline environments.”
From The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies (2020) · cites this paper as V an Popta et al. (2017)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846
Shute, V. J. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307313795 · Cited by 4,631
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities
Topping, K. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170598 · Cited by 2,173
Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology
Jonassen, D. H., Spector, M. J., Driscoll, M., Merrill, M. D., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Driscoll, M. P. (2008) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203880869 · Cited by 1,692
Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design
Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462 · Cited by 1,636
The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079912331379935 · Cited by 1,206
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Corgan, 2004, Making your online course successful, Business Education Forum, 58, 51
- Nicol, 2013, Peer review: Putting feedback processes in students' hands, Perspectives on Pedagogy and Practice, 4, 111
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 258
Ge, Z.-G. (2019) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2019.1643743 · Cited by 11
Wang, A., Yu, S.-Q., Wang, M.-H., Wu, L., Wang, D., & Huang, L. (2023) · System (Linköping) · doi:10.1016/j.system.2023.103055 · Cited by 10
Waluyo, B., & Panmei, B. (2024) · Journal of Technology and Science Education · doi:10.3926/jotse.2305 · Cited by 9
Incorporating Computing Professionals’ Know-how
Sánchez, A., Domínguez, C., Blanco, J. M., & Jaime, A. (2019) · ACM Transactions on Computing Education · doi:10.1145/3309157 · Cited by 8
A description of students’ commenting behaviours in an online blogging activity
Cheng, J., & Lei, J. (2020) · E-Learning and Digital Media · doi:10.1177/2042753020954971 · Cited by 9
van Blankenstein, F. M., O’Sullivan, J., Saab, N., & Paul Steendijk, A. (2021) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02755-z · Cited by 10
Detecting Problem Statements in Peer AssessmentsPreprint
Xiao, Y., Zingle, G., Jia, Q., Shah, H. R., Zhang, Y., Li, T., Karovaliya, M., Zhao, W., Song, Y., Ji, J., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.04532 · Cited by 11
The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group StudiesPreprint
Double, K. S. (2018) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.31234/osf.io/c4rkv · Cited by 9
Students' argumentation performance in online learning environments: Bridging culture and gender
Ranjbaran, F., Babaee, M., Parvaneh Akhteh Khaneh, M., Gohari, M., Daneshvar Ghorbani, B., Taghizadeh Kerman, N., Banihashem, S. K., & Noroozi, O. (2023) · International Journal of Technology in Education · doi:10.46328/ijte.460 · Cited by 8
Alemdağ, E., & Narciss, S. (2025) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-025-00522-4 · Cited by 17
Becerra, Á., & Cobos, R. (2025) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon62633.2025.11016499 · Cited by 8
Comparative Judgment: An Overview
Hartell, E., & Buckley, J. (2021) · Handbook for Online Learning Contexts: Digital, Mobile and Open · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-67349-9_20 · Cited by 7
Xiaomeng, Z., & Ravindran, L. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101422 · Cited by 14
Gándara, A. H., & Ortíz, D. C. (2020) · Sportis Scientific Journal of School Sport Physical Education and Psychomotricity · doi:10.17979/sportis.2020.6.2.6041 · Cited by 8
Student Perceptions of Peer Evaluation in an Online RN-to-BSN Course
Kim‐Godwin, Y. S., Turrise, S. L., Lawson, S., & Scott, M. D. (2018) · Nurse Educator · doi:10.1097/nne.0000000000000519 · Cited by 8
Peer Feedback in Second Language Oral Interaction
Iwashita, N., & Dao, P. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108589789.014 · Cited by 8
Tam, A. C. F. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2363328 · Cited by 10
Sofjan, A. K., Nguyen, K. A., Surati, D., & Marette, C. (2023) · Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1016/j.cptl.2023.04.004 · Cited by 7
Zong, Z., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-023-09401-4 · Cited by 7
Chen, W., Lyu, Q., & Su, J. (2024) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-024-09667-7 · Cited by 7
Greisel, M., Hornstein, J., & Kollar, I. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101438 · Cited by 8
Kurniawati, K. (2022) · Journal of English Educational Study (JEES) · doi:10.31932/jees.v5i1.1609 · Cited by 7
Aguilar, J. J., & Kang, S. (2023) · International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education · doi:10.29333/iejme/13628 · Cited by 7
Digital Hardware for Peer Assessment in K-12 Schools and Universities
Topping, K. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.666538 · Cited by 10
van Blankenstein, F. V., Truțescu, G.-O., van der Rijst, R. M., & Saab, N. (2019) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-019-09482-5
Başgül, M., & Çoştu, B. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-025-13404-z · Cited by 6
Stalmach, A., Reinck, C., D’Elia, P., Sano, S. D., & Casale, G. (2025) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-025-00825-8 · Cited by 17
Do learners learn from corrective peer feedback? Insights from students
Jiang, X., & Ironsi, S. S. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101385 · Cited by 6
Jin, M., Jiang, Q., Xiong, W., Li, Q., Feng, Y., & Zhao, W. (2024) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101394 · Cited by 6
Meylani, R. (2024) · Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology · doi:10.55214/25768484.v8i6.3763 · Cited by 31
Peer Assisted Learning: What Can Students Teach Us and Each Other?
Hamilton-Hinch, B., Stilwell, C. L., Manuel, C., Hutchinson, S. R., Woodford, K., & Ellis, A. (2021) · SCHOLE A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education · doi:10.1080/1937156x.2021.1969527 · Cited by 6
An Open-Ended Blended Approach to Teaching Interaction Designers to Code
Grace, K. S., Klaassens, B., Bray, L., & Elton-Pym, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Computer Science · doi:10.3389/fcomp.2022.813889 · Cited by 6
The Specificity and Helpfulness of Peer-to-Peer Feedback in Higher Education
Rietsche, R., Caines, A., Schramm, C., Pfütze, D., & Buttery, P. J. (2022) · Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.bea-1.15 · Cited by 6
Zion, O. A. M., Zion, M., & Spektor‐Levy, O. (2024) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-024-09666-8 · Cited by 14
Students’ Perceptions on Online Peer Feedback Practice In EFL Writing
Putra, I. G. K. M., Santosa, M. H., & Pratiwi, N. P. A. (2021) · IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education) · doi:10.15408/ijee.v8i2.21488 · Cited by 6
A quantitative revision method to improve usability of self-and peer assessment in MOOCs
Na, J., & Liu, Y. (2019) · ACM Turing Celebration Conference - China (ACM TURC) · doi:10.1145/3321408.3322846 · Cited by 6
Weng, J.-Y., Noordin, N., Ahmad, N., & Chen, L.-Y. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2504228 · Cited by 9
Zeng, X., Ravindran, L., & Amini, M. (2023) · International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) · doi:10.11591/ijere.v12i3.24699 · Cited by 5
Unveiling the synergy of peer feedback and the Metaverse
Wu, J. G., Yang, Z., Wu, S., & Zou, D. (2024) · Computers & Education X Reality · doi:10.1016/j.cexr.2024.100056 · Cited by 7
Improving Students’ Writing Skill Using Online Feedback
Vadia, M. N., & Ciptaningrum, D. S. (2020) · International Conference on Language, Literature, and Arts Education (ICLLAE) · doi:10.2991/assehr.k.200804.034 · Cited by 5
4. From Online Learning to Digital Transformation
Jhurry, D., & Rampersad, R. D. (2022) · UJ Press eBooks · doi:10.36615/9781776402304-04 · Cited by 5
The influence of students’ ability on the continuous intention of blended learning
Liu, Y., & Wang, S. (2022) · SN Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43545-022-00499-1 · Cited by 6
Exploring the Type and Quality of Peer Feedback in a Graduate-Level Blended Course
Erbilgin, E., Robinson, J. M., Jarrah, A. M., Johnson, J. D., & Gningue, S. M. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13060548 · Cited by 5
Xu, L., Hu, J., Li, H., & Li, J. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2024.2333932 · Cited by 5
Exploring the role of peer-assisted learning for professional preparation in recreation
Hutchinson, S. R., Woodford, K., Ellis, A., Hamilton-Hinch, B., Stilwell, C. L., & Manuel, C. (2021) · Leisure/Loisir · doi:10.1080/14927713.2021.1922092 · Cited by 5
Guidelines to assist building effective educational applications and e-games for children with ADHD.
Sinnari, D. (2019) · Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) · doi:10.15126/thesis.00850159 · Cited by 5
Deng, Y., & Sitthitikul, P. (2024) · rEFLections · doi:10.61508/refl.v32i1.277804 · Cited by 8
Leveraging generative AI to facilitate peer feedback in collaborative argumentation learning
Chang, Y., Liu, Q., Lu, Y., & Miao, E. (2026) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-026-00586-w · Cited by 4
Feedback Assisted by Technology: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research
Huang, W., Stephens, J. M., & Brown, G. (2025) · International Journal of Technology in Education · doi:10.46328/ijte.1061 · Cited by 7
Aben, J. E. J., Timmermans, A. C., Dingyloudi, F., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2023) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101248 · Cited by 6
Virtual Team Building in an Intelligent Collaborative Learning Environment
Kuznetsova, M., Gura, D. A., & Vorona-Slivinskaya, L. (2023) · Journal of Information Technology Education Research · doi:10.28945/5089 · Cited by 12
Li, C., Chen, Y., Zhou, S., Shi, J., Yang, S., & Li, M. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16229657 · Cited by 4
JEBUR, A. (2020) · Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists · doi:10.17478/jegys.703766 · Cited by 4
Wang, A., Wu, L., & Wang, D. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt52272.2021.00041 · Cited by 4
Brücknerová, K. (2021) · doi:10.5817/cz.muni.m210-9914-2021 · Cited by 4
Xiao, Y., Zingle, G., Jia, Q., Akbar, S., Song, Y., Dong, M., Li, Q., & Gehringer, E. F. (2020) · Educational Data Mining · Cited by 4
Maybee, S., Bolden, B., & Joordens, S. (2025) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2025.2485887 · Cited by 3
Chen, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1711768 · Cited by 4
Kakinuma, K., Nishiguti, F., Sonoda, K., Tajiri, H., & Tanaka, A. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.562081 · Cited by 3
Measuring Peer Feedback on Writing Class: A Study on Third-Semester Pre-Service English Teachers
Sumekto, D. R., & Setyawati, H. (2019) · Lingua Cultura · doi:10.21512/lc.v13i1.5058 · Cited by 6
The Impact of Online and Face-to-Face Peer Feedback on Pre-Service Teachers in EFL Academic Writing
Kaçar, I. G. (2021) · Design Solutions for Adaptive Hypermedia Listening Software · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-7876-6.ch007 · Cited by 1
Microteaching and Peer Assessment in Mathematics Teaching Practice
İLHAN, A., Poçan, S., & Aslaner, R. (2023) · Brock Education Journal · doi:10.26522/brocked.v32i2.992 · Cited by 3
Assessment Types and Methods in Distance Learning
Adanır, G. A. (2020) · Advances in mobile and distance learning book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-4769-4.ch002 · Cited by 3
Integrating Computer-Mediated Peer Review in ESL/EFL Higher Education: A Systematic Review
Drajatı, N. A., Rochsantiningsih, D., Cahyaningrum, D., Handayani, E. I. P., & Kurtianti, E. (2022) · AL-ISHLAH Jurnal Pendidikan · doi:10.35445/alishlah.v15i1.2872 · Cited by 3
Effectiveness and Usability of a Developed Collaborative Online Tool for Children with ADHD
Sinnari, D., Krause, P., & Abulkhair, M. (2019) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-06134-0_52 · Cited by 3
Keeping it human: Pandemic era psychiatry teaching
Morris, S. G., Greenstone, H., & Chute, R. (2021) · The Clinical Teacher · doi:10.1111/tct.13415 · Cited by 3
Pâquet, L. (2023) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.20.02.04 · Cited by 3
The Global Conference on Education and Research: Volume 4
James, W. B., Cobanoglu, C., & Cavusoglu, M. (2021) · Conference proceedings · doi:10.5038/2572-6374-v4 · Cited by 4
Mitigating Speaking Anxiety in Language Education Through Practical Strategies
Özçelik, A. E. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-7342-2.ch006 · Cited by 2
Zhang, X. (2025) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2025.100977 · Cited by 2
Hornstein, J., Greisel, M., & Kollar, I. (2025) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-025-09745-4 · Cited by 5
Namaziandost, E., & Çakmak, F. (2025) · Reflective Practice · doi:10.1080/14623943.2025.2576168 · Cited by 2
Zhan, Y., Wan, Z. H., & Each, N. (2025) · Language Testing in Asia · doi:10.1186/s40468-025-00405-5 · Cited by 2
Student Feedback Use During Cross-Age Peer Tutoring
Swanson, E., Mauer, E., Shanahan, E., Wanzek, J., & Vaughn, S. (2026) · The Elementary school journal · doi:10.1086/739254 · Cited by 2
Zhou, J., Zhao, N., Gao, X., & Han, X. (2026) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2026.102236 · Cited by 3
Pâquet, L., & Luyn, A. V. (2021) · New Writing · doi:10.1080/14790726.2021.1993929 · Cited by 2
Vasojević, N., Vučetić, I. T., & Kirin, S. D. (2021) · Узданица · doi:10.46793/uzdanica18.ii.035v · Cited by 2
Giving Feedback to Peers in an Online Inquiry-Learning Environment
Dmoshinskaia, N., & Gijlers, H. (2023) · Social interaction in learning and development · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29411-2_13 · Cited by 3
Arslan, A. (2023) · Croatian Journal of Education - Hrvatski časopis za odgoj i obrazovanje · doi:10.15516/cje.v25i2.4721 · Cited by 2
Alaofi, S., & Russell, S. (2024) · ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE) · doi:10.1145/3626252.3630876 · Cited by 2
Learning by Doing: An Online, Open-Source Course Design Approach to Systems Librarianship
Burns, C. S., Pusateri, J., & DiGiacomo, D. K. (2024) · Journal of Education for Library and Information Science · doi:10.3138/jelis-2023-0070 · Cited by 2
Impact of Peer Feedback in a Web Programming Course on Students’ Achievement
Matejić, J., & Milenković, A. (2025) · International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science Engineering and Education · doi:10.23947/2334-8496-2025-13-1-33-49 · Cited by 3
Breaking Barriers: Enhancing Student Satisfaction in Online Engineering Education
Sampaio, S. C. D. B., & Cormican, K. T. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Education · doi:10.1109/te.2025.3573603 · Cited by 2
Roleplaying to develop students’ awareness and robust learning of advanced mathematical concepts
Telloni, A. I. (2022) · International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/0020739x.2022.2077852 · Cited by 2
Marion, C., Laferrière, T., & Tremblay-Gagnon, D. (2022) · Revue internationale du CRIRES innover dans la tradition de Vygotsky · doi:10.51657/ric.v6i1.51446 · Cited by 7
Duckworth, J., & Halliwell, C. (2022) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v23i3.6238 · Cited by 2
Son, M., & Ha, M. (2024) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440241256538 · Cited by 2
A Comparison of Online Peer Assessment and Face-to-face Peer Assessment
Güven, U., Kush, J. C., & Sezer, B. B. (2023) · Fìlologìčnì traktati · doi:10.21272/ftrk.2023.15(2)-10 · Cited by 1
Colombo, L. M., Rodas, E. L., & Álvarez, G. (2024) · Learning and Teaching · doi:10.3167/latiss.2024.170203 · Cited by 2
Rompay-Bartels, I. V., & Watkins, C. (2025) · Sustainable development goals series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-76418-9_4 · Cited by 1
Gerges, E., & Rice, B. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2536565 · Cited by 2
Melhorando a qualidade dos feedbacks na avaliação por pares mediada por rubrica
Ferreira, F. C., & Alvés, I. P. (2025) · Revista de Gestão e Avaliação Educacional · doi:10.5902/2318133892978 · Cited by 1
Knowledge into Practice: Exploring fairness configurations for objective behavior in peer assessment
Huang, D.-H. (2025) · Journal of Innovation & Knowledge · doi:10.1016/j.jik.2025.100785 · Cited by 3
Başgül, M., & Çoştu, B. (2026) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-025-10287-0 · Cited by 1
Setiawan, I. (2026) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2026.2620645 · Cited by 1
Teacher cognition of integrating higher-order thinking into EFL writing in a high school in China
Defang, Z., Hu, T., Zhang, Y., & Zhao, L. (2026) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2026.102300 · Cited by 1
Gao, X., Schunn, C. D., Noroozi, O., Gulikers, J. T. M., Biemans, H. J. A., & Banihashem, S. K. (2026) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2026.102428 · Cited by 1
Liao, C. C. Y., Li, Y., & Cheng, H. N. H. (2019) · IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI) · doi:10.1109/iiai-aai.2019.00050 · Cited by 1
The Impact of Interactive Online Learning on Students Knowledge Amplifying by Parents Perspective
Abu-Bajeh, Z. Y., & Helmi, R. A. A. (2021) · International Conference of Women in Data Science at Taif University (WiDSTaif) · doi:10.1109/widstaif52235.2021.9430235 · Cited by 1
The use of WeChat in higher education: Investigation of Chinese students in Australia
Kim, D.-Y., & Chang, S. (2021) · Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE) · doi:10.14742/ascilite2021.0133 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- van Popta, E., Kral, M., Camp, G., Martens, R. L., & Simons, P. R.-J.
- Affiliations
- HAN University of Applied Sciences (NL)
- Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
- Venue
- Educational Research Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 20
- Pages
- 24-34
- ISSN
- 1747-938X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2535628851
- Semantic Scholar
- 32d4380c5c75679f86fd9eb0982f501fbf574150
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 52.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Educational Research Review (publishedVersion)
- DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion)
- DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- peer feedback, online learning, cognitive processes, online peer assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
