The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring the value of peer feedback in online learning for the provider
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“It is somewhat surprising that most studies that examine the effect of peer assessment tend to only assess the impact on the assessee and not the assessor (van Popta et al. 2017).”
From The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies (2020) · cites this paper as van Popta et al. 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“V an Popta et al. (2017) argue that the cognitive processes involved in peer assessment, such as evaluating, explaining, and suggesting, similarly play out in online and offline environments.”
From The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies (2020) · cites this paper as V an Popta et al. (2017)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846
Shute, V. J. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307313795 · Cited by 4,631
Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems
Sadler, D. R. (1989) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/bf00117714 · Cited by 4,285
Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities
Topping, K. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170598 · Cited by 2,173
Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology
Jonassen, D. H., Spector, M. J., Driscoll, M., Merrill, M. D., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Driscoll, M. P. (2008) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203880869 · Cited by 1,692
Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design
Boud, D., & Molloy, E. (2013) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2012.691462 · Cited by 1,636
The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: A review
Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Sluijsmans, D. (1999) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079912331379935 · Cited by 1,206
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Corgan, 2004, Making your online course successful, Business Education Forum, 58, 51
- Nicol, 2013, Peer review: Putting feedback processes in students' hands, Perspectives on Pedagogy and Practice, 4, 111
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies
Double, K. S., McGrane, J. A., & Hopfenbeck, T. N. (2020) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-019-09510-3 · Cited by 446
Elshami, W., Taha, M. H., Abuzaid, M., Saravanan, C., Kawas, S. A., & Abdalla, M. E. (2021) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.1080/10872981.2021.1920090 · Cited by 426
Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318 · Cited by 318
Digital transformation in education: A systematic review of education 4.0
Mukul, E., & Büyüközkan, G. (2023) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122664 · Cited by 368
The development of student feedback literacy: the influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback
Han, Y., & Xu, Y. (2019) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1689545 · Cited by 207
Emergency Online Learning in Low-Resource Settings: Effective Student Engagement Strategies
Abou-Khalil, V., Helou, S., Khalifé, E., Chen, M. A., Majumdar, R., & Ogata, H. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11010024 · Cited by 243
Fidan, M., & Gencel, N. (2022) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/07356331221077901 · Cited by 186
Strengthening dialogic peer feedback aiming for deep learning in SPOCs
Filius, R. M., de Kleijn, R. A. M., Uijl, S. G., Prins, F. J., van Rijen, H. V. M., & Grobbee, D. E. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.004 · Cited by 163
Online peer feedback patterns of success and failure in argumentative essay writing
Kerman, N. T., Noroozi, O., Banihashem, S. K., Karami, M., & Biemans, H. J. A. (2022) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2022.2093914 · Cited by 135
Making internal feedback explicit: exploiting the multiple comparisons that occur during peer review
Nicol, D., & McCallum, S. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1924620 · Cited by 107
Chang, C., Panjaburee, P., Lin, H., Lai, C., & Hwang, G. (2022) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-021-10071-y · Cited by 88
Audio peer feedback to promote deep learning in online education
Filius, R. M., de Kleijn, R. A. M., Uijl, S. G., Prins, F. J., van Rijen, H. V. M., & Grobbee, D. E. (2019) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12363 · Cited by 91
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102160 · Cited by 78
Classroom Assessment and Educational Measurement
Brookhart, S. M., & McMillan, J. H. (2019) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429507533 · Cited by 103
Xiao-wei, K., & Zhang, W. (2020) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1817758 · Cited by 95
New Directions in Formative Feedback in Interactive Learning Environments
Goldin, I. M., Narciss, S., Foltz, P. W., & Bauer, M. I. (2017) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0135-7 · Cited by 75
Impact of contextual and personal determinants on online social conformity
Wijenayake, S., van Berkel, N., Kostakos, V., & Gonçalves, J. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106302 · Cited by 84
Guo, K., Zhang, E. D., Li, D., & Yu, S. (2025) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13540 · Cited by 69
Chang, D., Hwang, G., Chang, S., & Wang, S. (2021) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-021-10062-z · Cited by 78
Technology and Feedback Design
Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Ryan, T., Mahoney, P., Boud, D. J., Phillips, M., & Molloy, E. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17727-4_124-1 · Cited by 67
Effects of online peer assessment on higher‐order thinking: A meta‐analysis
Zhan, Y., Yan, Z., Wan, Z. H., Xiang, W., Zeng, Y., Yang, M., & Yang, L. (2023) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13310 · Cited by 95
A systematic review of peer assessment design elements
Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J.-W., Panadero, E., Ruiz, J. F., Warrens, M., & To, J. (2023) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-023-09723-7 · Cited by 65
What aspects of online peer feedback robustly predict growth in students' task performance?
Zong, Z., Schunn, C. D., & Wang, Y. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106924 · Cited by 61
Attitudes and awareness of regional Pacific Island students towards e-learning
Johnson, J. B., Reddy, P., Chand, R., & Naiker, M. (2021) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-021-00248-z · Cited by 58
Eshuis, E. H., ter Vrugte, J., Anjewierden, A. A., Bollen, L., Sikken, J., & de Jong, T. (2019) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-019-09296-0 · Cited by 58
Schillings, M., Roebertsen, H., Savelberg, H., van Dijk, A., & Dolmans, D. (2021) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2020.1798889 · Cited by 56
Digital peer assessment in school teacher education and development: a systematic review
Topping, K. J. (2023) · Research Papers in Education · doi:10.1080/02671522.2021.1961301 · Cited by 54
Fu, Q.-K., Lin, C.-J., & Hwang, G.-J. (2019) · Journal of Computers in Education · doi:10.1007/s40692-019-00131-x · Cited by 57
Fang, J.-W., Chang, S., Hwang, G., & Yang, G. (2021) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-021-09990-7 · Cited by 53
Haro, A. V., Noroozi, O., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Banihashem, S. K. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2215822 · Cited by 67
Zhang, Y., Pi, Z., Chen, L., Zhang, X., & Yang, J. (2021) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100950 · Cited by 53
Hsia, L., & Hwang, G. (2020) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12986 · Cited by 47
Understanding the what and when of peer feedback benefits for performance and transfer
Yu, Q., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.107857 · Cited by 50
Alemdağ, E., & Yıldırım, Z. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104574 · Cited by 51
Ge, Z.-G. (2019) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1677721 · Cited by 46
Deiglmayr, A. (2017) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0355-8
Scaffolding peer-assessment skills: Risk of interference with learning domain-specific skills?
Könings, K. D., van Zundert, M. J., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2018) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.11.007 · Cited by 46
Online self‐regulated learning and academic procrastination: A moderated mediation model
Ma, M., Li, M., Wang, Q., Qiu, A., & Wang, T. (2022) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.22730 · Cited by 52
Implementing assessment as learning in the L2 writing classroom: a Chinese case
Xiang, X., Yuan, R. E., & Yu, B. (2021) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2021.1965539 · Cited by 41
Zhan, Y., Wan, Z. H., & Sun, D. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104341 · Cited by 42
Supporting the development of collaboration and feedback skills in instructional designers
Lowell, V. L., & Ashby, I. V. (2018) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-018-9170-8 · Cited by 40
Effects of anonymity on online peer review in second-language writing
van den Bos, A. H., & Tan, E. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103638 · Cited by 45
Comparison of Online and Face-to-Face Peer Review of Writing
Pritchard, R. J., & Morrow, D. (2017) · Computers & composition/Computers and composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2017.09.006 · Cited by 38
Engaging with multiple sources of feedback in academic writing: postgraduate students’ perspectives
Xu, L., & Zhang, T. (2023) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2161089 · Cited by 40
Incidencia de la revisión por pares en la construcción de textos académicos a nivel universitario
Pereira, M. M. B. (2021) · DELTA Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada · doi:10.1590/1678-460x202153017 · Cited by 40
Kara, N. (2021) · Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice · doi:10.53761/1.18.4.11 · Cited by 38
Liu, X., Wang, J., & Zou, B. (2025) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101505 · Cited by 37
Zhan, Y. (2021) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2021.2021393 · Cited by 32
Sun, C., Liu, J., Razmerita, L., Xu, Y., & Qi, J. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14137789 · Cited by 32
Strijbos, J.-W., & Wichmann, A. (2017) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0353-x · Cited by 31
Blended Learning as a Good Practice in ESL Courses Compared to F2F Learning and Online Learning
Wei, Z., & Zhu, C. (2019) · International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning · doi:10.4018/ijmbl.2020010105 · Cited by 30
Crosthwaite, P. R., Sanhueza, A. X. G., & Schweinberger, M. (2021) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2021.101021 · Cited by 28
Vrieling, E., Henderikx, M., Nadolski, R. J., & Kreijns, K. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.793798 · Cited by 28
Does anonymity matter? Examining quality of online peer assessment and students' attitudes
Kobayashi, M. (2020) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.4694 · Cited by 29
“Furthermore, Van Popta et al. (2017) maintain that online peer assessment benefits not only the recipient of feedback but also the provider of feedback, if students are required to use high level of cognitive skills, involving “an evaluative judgement, a suggestion for improvement, and an…”
BackgroundInfluentialHutt, S. J., DePiro, A., Wang, J., Rhodes, S., Baker, R. S., Hieb, G., Sethuraman, S., Ocumpaugh, J. L., & Mills, C. (2024) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3636555.3636850 · Cited by 32
Online Learning in Pandemic Times
Chang, H. S. (2020) · Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala · doi:10.18662/rrem/12.2sup1/296 · Cited by 27
Zeng, X., & Ravindran, L. (2024) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101691 · Cited by 49
Supportive Peer Feedback in Tertiary Education: Analysis of Pre-Service Teachers’ Perceptions
Ortíz, D. C., Nogué, L., Serra, T., & Colomer, J. (2019) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci9040280 · Cited by 29
Chen, W., & Gao, J. (2024) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2022.2043381 · Cited by 28
Developing a Formative Assessment Protocol to Support Professional Growth
Wylie, E. C., & Lyon, C. J. (2020) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1080/10627197.2020.1766956 · Cited by 39
Chen, W., Hu, H., Lyu, Q., & Zheng, L. (2024) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.13078 · Cited by 26
Liu, C., Hwang, G., Yu, P., Tu, Y.-F., & Wang, Y. (2025) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-025-10484-z · Cited by 46
Characteristics of productive feedback encounters in online learning
Jensen, L. X., Bearman, M., & Boud, D. J. (2023) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2023.2213168 · Cited by 24
Öztürk, M., Yüce, E., & Türker, P. M. (2025) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-024-09812-8 · Cited by 35
Teaching sourcing during online inquiry – adolescents with the weakest skills benefited the most
Hämäläinen, E. K., Kiili, C., Räikkönen, E., Lakkala, M., Ilomäki, L., Toom, A., & Marttunen, M. J. (2022) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-022-09597-2 · Cited by 23
Designing Laboratories for Online Instruction Using the iOLab Device
Leblond, L., & Hicks, M. (2021) · The Physics Teacher · doi:10.1119/10.0004886 · Cited by 20
Peungcharoenkun, T., & Waluyo, B. (2024) · Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education · doi:10.1186/s40862-024-00286-w · Cited by 19
Yu, J., Yu, S., & Chen, L. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13559 · Cited by 25
Perspectives on online learning: Advantages and challenges in higher education
Rueda, M. M., Cerero, J. F., Fernández-Cerero, D., & Menéses, E. L. (2024) · Contemporary Educational Technology · doi:10.30935/cedtech/15011 · Cited by 19
Overcoming Barriers for Implementing International Online Collaborative Assignments in Chemistry
McCollum, B. M., Morsch, L. A., Shokoples, B. G., & Skagen, D. (2019) · The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning · doi:10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2019.1.8004 · Cited by 19
Enhancing the Peer-Feedback Process Through Instructional Support: A Meta-Analysis
Hornstein, J., Keller, M. V., Greisel, M., Dresel, M., & Kollar, I. (2025) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-025-10017-3 · Cited by 18
“…the internal, that is the covert, cognitive processes that learners engage in during feedback provision (i.e., explaining and evaluation processes; van Popta et al., 2017) and feedback reception (i.e., reflect and compare critical the received feedback with their own initial task solution; Nicol…”
InfluentialDindar, M., Çelik, İ., & Muukkonen, H. (2022) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-022-09621-x · Cited by 22
Shao, J., Cheng, L., Wang, Y., Li, K., & Li, Y. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2251040 · Cited by 19
Dmoshinskaia, N., Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2020) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100959 · Cited by 19
Hunt, P., Leijen, Ä., & van der Schaaf, M. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11060278 · Cited by 17
Feedback in Postgraduate Online Learning: Perspectives and Practices
Hounsell, D. (2021) · Postdigital science and education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77673-2_3 · Cited by 18
Alemdağ, E., & Yıldırım, Z. (2022) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-022-10115-x · Cited by 20
Technology and Feedback Design
Dawson, P., Henderson, M., Ryan, T., Mahoney, P., Boud, D., Phillips, M., & Molloy, E. (2023) · Learning, Design, and Technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17461-7_124 · Cited by 16
Rompay-Bartels, I. V., & Geessink, J. (2021) · Journal of International Education in Business · doi:10.1108/jieb-07-2020-0063 · Cited by 15
Zhang, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102210 · Cited by 19
Rehman, N., Huang, X., Mahmood, A., Maqbool, S., & Javed, S. (2024) · New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development · doi:10.1155/2024/1271802 · Cited by 16
Dispersed assessment: A novel approach to enhancing student engagement during and beyond Covid-19
Thompson, Z., Yoon, H. C., & Booth, P. (2023) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100811 · Cited by 15
Learning as a peer assessor: evaluating peer-assessment strategies
Culver, C. (2022) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2022.2107167 · Cited by 14
Effects of the visual analytics of peer feedback on teachers’ TPACK development in a lesson study
Wang, A., Yu, S., Wang, M., & Chen, L. (2023) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2023.2204354 · Cited by 14
Student perceptions of feedback in reciprocal or nonreciprocal peer tutoring or mentoring
Byl, E., & Topping, K. J. (2023) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101304 · Cited by 34
Praise affects the “Praiser”: Effects of ability-focused vs. effort-focused praise on motivation
Kakinuma, K., Nakai, M., Hada, Y., Kizawa, M., & Tanaka, A. (2020) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.1080/00220973.2020.1799313 · Cited by 17
“How Did I Do?”: Giving learners effective and affective feedback
Howard, N. R. (2020) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-020-09874-2 · Cited by 14
Marei, A., Yoon, S. A., Yoo, J.-U., Richman, T., Noushad, N. F., Miller, K. M., & Shim, J. (2021) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems9010010 · Cited by 17
Cao, H.-Q., & Han, C. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1326746 · Cited by 13
Salillas, E. C., Sánchez‐Azqueta, C., Gimeno, C., & Aldea, C. (2020) · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/jarhe-11-2019-0287 · Cited by 13
Online Peer Review of Oral Presentations
Ho, E. (2020) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/0033688220969280 · Cited by 13
Constructive peer-feedback to improve language and communication skills in medical education
Janesarvatan, F., & Asoodar, M. (2024) · Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.1080/17501229.2024.2311834 · Cited by 12
Shulgina, G., Costley, J., Щеглова, И. А., Zhang, H., & Sedova, N. S. (2024) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-024-00315-8 · Cited by 18
Facilitating Counselor Reflective Learning with a Real-time Annotation tool
Chen, T., Liu, M. X., Ding, E. Y., O'Neil, E., Agarwal, M., Kraut, R. E., & Dabbish, L. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581551 · Cited by 11
Tan, J. S. H., Chen, W., Su, J., & Su, G. (2023) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-023-09390-4 · Cited by 11
Gökoğlu, S., Yılmaz, F. G. K., & Yılmaz, R. (2024) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v25i4.7660 · Cited by 18
Berg, S. A., & Moon, A. C. (2021) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/d1rp00213a · Cited by 13
Detecting Suggestions in Peer Assessments.
Zingle, G., Radhakrishnan, B., Xiao, Y., Gehringer, E. F., Xiao, Z., Pramudianto, F., Khurana, G., & Arnav, A. (2019) · Educational Data Mining · Cited by 11
Topic Modeling on Peer Interaction in Online and Mobile Learning of Higher Education: 1993–2022
Weng, A. K.-W., Chang, H.-Y., Lai, K., & Lin, Y.-B. (2024) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci14080867 · Cited by 21
Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Peer Feedback in Teaching and Learning
Lam, C. N. C., & Habil, H. (2021) · Pertanika journal of social science & humanities · doi:10.47836/pjssh.29.3.25 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- van Popta, E., Kral, M., Camp, G., Martens, R. L., & Simons, P. R.-J.
- Affiliations
- HAN University of Applied Sciences (NL)
- Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
- Venue
- Educational Research Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 20
- Pages
- 24-34
- ISSN
- 1747-938X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2535628851
- Semantic Scholar
- 32d4380c5c75679f86fd9eb0982f501fbf574150
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 52.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Educational Research Review (publishedVersion)
- DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion)
- DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- peer feedback, online learning, cognitive processes, online peer assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review