Cited by 698Online and Blended LearningEducational Technology and E-LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Four key challenges to the design of blended learning: A systematic literature review

Open access
Boelens, Ruth, De Wever, Bram, Voet, Michiel·2017·Educational Research Review

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.06.001

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Watson, J. (2008). Blended Learning: The Convergence of Online and Face-to-Face Education. Promising practices in online learning (Vol. 572). North American Council for Online Learning. Retrieved from https://goo.gl/6AGpNP
  2. Workman, J. J., & Stenard, R. A. (1996). Student support services for distance learners. DEOSNEWS, 6(3), 1-11. Retrieved from http://www.ed.psu.edu/ acsde/deos/deosnews/deosnews6_3.asp

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boelens, R., De Wever, B., & Voet, M.
Affiliations
Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Boelens, Ruth
Venue
Educational Research Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
22
Pages
1-18
ISSN
1747-938X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2624448409
Cited by
698
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 78 · 2025: 72 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 125 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 71 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 4
FWCI
14.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Educational Research Review (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Agency for Science and Technology (SBO 140029)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
blended learning, instructional design, flexibility, social interaction, student learning process, learner control, online learning activities, face-to-face teaching, personalized learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review