Cited by 13Online Learning and AnalyticsStudent Assessment and FeedbackOnline and Blended Learning

Using Learner Analytics to Explore the Potential Contribution of Multimodal Formative Assessment to Academic Success in Higher Education

Open access
Kohnke, Lucas, Foung, Dennis, Chen, Julia·2022·Sage Open

Abstract

Blended learning pedagogical practices supported by learning management systems have become an important part of higher education curricula. In most cases, these blended curricula are evaluated through multimodal formative assessments. Although assessments can strongly affect student outcomes, research on the topic is limited. In this paper, we adopted a learning analytics approach to explore student engagement with formative assessments and the power of these assessments to predict student outcomes in an English for Academic Purposes courses in a Hong Kong university. The study retrieved the data logs from 7,815 students and used the data to analyze student engagement with the formative assessments. The results suggested that the students put effort into completing the assessments. The degree to which assessments predict learning outcomes depend on students’ level of subject knowledge and their understanding of the relevance of the assessments. This study showed that learning analytics provided reliable evidence for understanding students’ engagement and identifying at-risk students. Therefore, learning analytics research has the potential to inform pedagogical practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/21582440221089957

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quizzes are useful in identifying at-risk students, but they are more helpful when students deem them relevant and useful for learning.

    “Furthermore, quizzes are useful in identifying at-risk students, however they are more helpful when they are deemed relevant and useful for learning by students (e.g., Kohnke et al., 2022).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kohnke, L., Foung, D., & Chen, J.
Affiliations
  • Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Corresponding author
Foung, Dennis
Venue
Sage Open
Published
2022-04
Volume
12
Issue
2
ISSN
2158-2440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4223539203
Cited by
13
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SAGE Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
learning analytics, student engagement, academic success prediction, blended learning, virtual learning environments, English for academic purposes, at-risk students, student effort, higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review