The DOI matches its Crossref record; 152 of the 190 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Does gamification improve student learning outcome? Evidence from a meta-analysis and synthesis of qualitative data in educational contexts
Abstract
Despite the buzz around gamification as an exciting new method to engage students, evidence of its ability to enhance learning is mixed. In fact, gamification has attracted considerable controversy (“gamification is bullshit”) and some derogatory labels such as “exploitationware.” Therefore, in order to make the case for or against gamification in education, it is important to examine the effects (if any) of gamification on student learning achievements. This study is a meta-analysis of 30 independent interventions (3,202 participants) drawn from 24 quantitative studies that have examined the effects of gamification on student academic performance in various educational settings. The results show an overall significant medium effect size in favor of gamification over learning without gamification (Hedges' g = 0.504, 95% CI [0.284–0.723], p
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
A theory of social comparison processes
Festinger, L. (1954) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872675400700202 · Cited by 20,926
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 · Cited by 19,575
Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency
Bandura, A. (1982) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.37.2.122 · Cited by 15,975
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., & the PRISMA-P Group (2015) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g7647 · Cited by 13,120
Flagged first, then by citations
38 of the 190 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Arkün Kocadere, 2018, 21, 12
- Caponetto, 2014, Gamification and education: A literature review, 50
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–672 of 672
From Passive Learning to Active Engagement: Investigating Gamified Enterprise System Training
Branas, A., Hammer, A., Haddara, M., & Langseth, M. (2026) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2026.03.062
Venegas, A. G., & Gutiérrez, A. I. C. (2026) · ASCE MAGAZINE · doi:10.70577/asce.v5i1.736
Verdesoto, L. Y. A., Torres, G. F. V., Ulloa, L. A. A., et al. (2026) · Revista Científica Multidisciplinar G-nerando · doi:10.66473/rcmg.v7i1.996
Diani, A., & Aligod, L. (2025) · doi:10.1109/atscm67505.2025.11473854
“…theme is that about integrated digital ecosystems in which diverse technologies blend together—typically facilitated using clouds as well as edges—to form interconnected, adaptive, as well as sustainable networks, which is a view that is gaining traction among newer integrative studies[16], [17].”
Balci, S., & Morris, B. J. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70234
Does gamification really facilitate learning? An experiment with matching-to-sample
Regaço, A., de Souza, S. R., & de Rose, J. C. (2026) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2026.102281
Gamification and Leader Development
Schrier, K. “. (2025) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-83708-544-620251011
Cheng, M., Lai, X., Zeng, W., Bai, S., Duan, C., & Sun, D. (2026) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-026-10148-1 · Cited by 2
Self-citationMilani, M., Inforzato, A., & Volonterio, A. (2026) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c01568
Wuyts, S., Everaert, P. C., & Opdecam, E. (2026) · Accounting Education · doi:10.1080/09639284.2026.2671268
Ospina, R. A. A., Domínguez, A. E. S., Castelo, L. E. P., & Salaya, C. E. C. (2026) · ASCE MAGAZINE · doi:10.70577/asce.v5i2.839
Gamificación y motivación académica en estudiantes de educación secundaria
Jimenez-Villares, A. M., García-Burgos, E. B., Chávez-Cabrera, F. C., Arreaga-Anzules, O. B., & Ibarra-Álvarez, J. V. (2026) · Revista Científica Ciencia y Método · doi:10.55813/gaea/rcym/v4/n2/208
How can we enrich student induction experiences? Content matters
Vaduva, A., Chang, K., & Sandland, S. (2026) · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/jarhe-12-2025-1095
Qiao, S., Yeung, S. S., & Chu, S. K. W. (2026) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1111/ijal.70246
Outcomes of a Foundational Sciences Daily Engagement Game in Medical Education
Schmidt, M. (2026) · Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education · doi:10.1002/bmb.70059
USE OF POLITICAL SIMULATORS IN DEVELOPING ANALYTICAL SKILLS OF HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS
Kalinichenko, M., Podolyan, Y., & Naydan, M. (2026) · Politology bulletin · doi:10.17721/2415-881x.2026.100.1.153-171
Apolo-Montero, D. A., Castillo-Romero, C. C., Samaniego-Flores, V. M., et al. (2026) · Revista Científica Zambos. · doi:10.69484/rcz/v5/n2/179
“Sin embargo, la literatura advierte que sus efectos dependen del diseño didáctico, pues los puntos, insignias o rankings aislados no garantizan aprendizaje profundo ni transferencia académica (Sailer & Homner, 2020; Bai et al., 2020).”
InfluentialSetyasto, N., Tyas, H. C., & Xinzhe, Z. (2026) · IJORER International Journal of Recent Educational Research · doi:10.46245/ijorer.v7i3.1475
Cando, D. A. F., Velasco, G. C., & de la Torres, E. I. V. (2026) · REDSA Revista Ecuatoriana de Desarrollo Social y Ambiental · doi:10.66646/redsa-2026/gnt3nk19
Badri, A. A., & Shahat, M. A. A. (2026) · Journal of Chemical Education · doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.5c01783
Gutierrez, R., Govea, J., & Valencia-Silva, E. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16060858
Bai, S., Zeng, H., Zhong, Q., Yang, C., Liu, S., Cao, L., & He, M. (2026) · JMIR Serious Games · doi:10.2196/85947
“Furthermore, the objectivity of responses obtained through self-reporting faces challenges, as participants may tend to exhibit bias, exaggeration, or even falsification during reporting [35].”
InfluentialSelf-citationPopa, N. L., & Assante, G. M. (2026) · Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1108/jarhe-11-2025-0926 · Cited by 1
Justification of the didactic status of the competitive approach to education
Gulov, A. P., & Berezhnova, E. V. (2026) · Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки · doi:10.20310/1810-0201-2026-31-3-658-676
Introducing gamified reputation metrics for self-regulating user behavior in social media
Hajarian, M., Dı́az, P., & Aedo, I. (2026) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2026.102771
Sebastian, P., Sharma, S., Iivari, N., Kinnula, M., Gautam, A., Monga, C., Verma, D., Pade, C. S., & Tandon, C. (2026) · ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) · doi:10.1145/3773077.3806133
“There have been repeated calls to invite children to explore, examine, and imagine the role of emerging technologies in their lives [1, 8, 60].”
Bastoni, R., Cowell, T. S., Murphy, A., McMahon, P., & Norberg, K. A. (2026) · ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S) · doi:10.1145/3774398.3811621
“Although this strategy consistently increases engagement with the gamification elements, effects on academic performance are less consistent and less frequently measured [2, 9, 12, 21, 30].”
InfluentialExploring gamification: Evidence from scoping and systematic reviews
Ali, S. S., Mirzazadeh, A., Almatrafi, D., Siddiq, W., Almelayu, A., & Alghamdi, D. (2026) · Journal of Dynamics and Games · doi:10.3934/jdg.2026043
Rehman, T., Muslim, A., Lashari, T. A., Ashraf, M., & Khan, A. (2026) · International Journal of Innovations in Science and Technology · doi:10.33411/ijist/1819
Lopes, R. P., Baptista, A., Tukaiev, S., Giannouli, V., & Ferreira, J. A. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1881419 · Cited by 1
Gamification in STEM education: Mapping the scientific research landscape
Yindeemak, A., Boonkwang, K., Pachumwon, T., et al. (2026) · Multidisciplinary Reviews · doi:10.31893/multirev.2026594
“…investigated the efficacy of gamification across various educational settings, from primary and secondary education (K – 12) (Almeida & Simoes, 2019; Bai et al., 2020) to tertiary institutions (Sailer & Homner, 2020; Vesa et al., 2021), focusing on impacts on cognitive skill development, content…”
Utilizing Adaptive Gamification in an Intelligent Tutoring System for Software Engineering Education
Meißner, N., Trautwein, L., Speth, S., Koch, N. N., & Becker, S. (2026) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3786580.3786945
“Prior research demonstrates promising effects of gamification on engagement and learning outcomes in higher education [5, 22].”
Palmquist, A., & Gunnars, F. (2026) · Technology Knowledge and Learning · doi:10.1007/s10758-026-10004-9
Teo, W., Ee, A. Z. Q., Lim, J., et al. (2026) · Next research. · doi:10.1016/j.nexres.2026.102195
Song, D., Guo, J., Rao, X., Hu, X., Gu, X., & Chen, J. (2026) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence14070150
“(Bai et al., 2020; Domínguez et al., 2013; Hamari et al., 2014; Hanus & Fox, 2015; Koivisto & Hamari, 2019; Lumsden et al., 2016; Mekler et al., 2017; Sailer et al., 2017; Sailer & Homner, 2020; Seaborn & Fels, 2015; Zainuddin et al., 2020).”
GAMIFICATION AS A CATALYST FOR ENHANCED LEARNING AMONG UNIVERSITY STUDENTS
Karim, N. A., Muhamat, A. A., & Jaafar, M. N. (2026) · International Journal of Modern Education · doi:10.35631/ijmoe.830004
AI Versus Human Feedback in Gamified Color Education: A Four-Arm Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
Shao, X., Liu, F., Wu, J., & Sanmugam, M. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16071247
“Gamification’s effect on learning has accumulated meta-analytic support: g = 0.49 for cognitive learning (Sailer & Homner, 2020), composite g = 0.504 across 30 studies (Bai et al., 2020), and g = 0.782 across 22 experimental studies (Zeng et al., 2024).”
InfluentialKougioumtzidou, E., Botsoglou, K., Beazidou, E., & Floros, G. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16081200
“On a macroscopic scale, understanding these dynamics is essential; as Bai et al. (2020) examine, the overarching pedagogical deployment of these systems dictates whether game mechanics foster a deeply engaging digital environment or merely reduce learning to rigid behavioral feedback loops driven…”
Schiele, T., Jiménez, M. V., Camligüney, Ö., Wirth, A., & Niklas, F. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16081304
“The learning elements of the apps focused strongly on feedback (Bai et al., 2020), which was provided verbally (i.e., positive feedback if the answer was correct, encouraging feedback to try again if the answer was incorrect), visually (e.g., stars, balloons for correct answers), auditorily (e.g.,…”
Gamificación y autorregulación del aprendizaje en educación media
de Arco, I. R. P., & Botero, J. C. R. (2026) · Revista Multidisciplinaria Voces de América y el Caribe · doi:10.69821/remuvac.v3i2.341
Zhang, C., Wu, W., & Yang, Z. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3719781
“This study conducted a data analysis across four dimensions: pre-test homogeneity testing, learning performance, learning process, learning attitudes and psychological cognition [26], [27], [28].”
PipelineEDU: Creating Synthetic Data for Educational Research and Applications
Nicolas, A., & Sakib, S. K. (2026) · ACM AI Letters · doi:10.1145/3838598
“Educational data supports diverse applications, including studying online education systems [9], improved student learning experiences [4], dropout prediction [1], academic-result prediction [6], academic-performance improvement [27], and support for diverse student populations [28].”
Reading Interventions in the Modern Era: Reconceptualizing the Utility of Video Games
Mehmedovic, S. (2025) · Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver) · doi:10.56902/etdcrp.2025.143
Çıldır, M., & Çobanoğulları, F. (2026) · Die Unterrichtspraxis/Teaching German · doi:10.1111/tger.70052
Gamificación como estrategia para fortalecer la motivación estudiantil en entornos educativos
Tandazo, D., Portelles, A. T., Reasco, R. A. B., & Villavicencio, G. J. D. (2026) · Revista Científica Multidisciplinar G-nerando · doi:10.66473/rcmg.v7i2.1412
Lomas, W. S. P. (2026) · Arandu-UTIC. · doi:10.69639/arandu.v13i3.2397
“…on gamification, learning is not always improved by standalone game elements unless they are in line with goals, feedback and learner needs (Bai et al., 2020; Sailer & Homner, 2020) moreover the goal in this situation is to transform current collaboration routines into repeating speaking…”
Cruz, M. K. B. D., Dizon-Yi, J. B., Honra, J. R., Maulion, R. J., Ollero, J. C., & Villanueva, J. C. P. M. (2026) · International Conference on e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning · doi:10.1109/ic4e69618.2026.11631427
Lim, J., Park, K., & Kim, M. (2026) · International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/s10763-026-10711-w
“Students who engaged with gamified mathematics platforms featur - ing immediate reward feedback reported higher MSE (Bai et al., 2020 ; Çakıroğlu et al., 2021).”
Salcedo, M. D. C. N. (2026) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2026.2713623
Sanchiz, M. (2026) · Psychologie Française · doi:10.1016/j.psfr.2026.07.002
Lisboa, L. Z., Cavalcante, L. F. F., Camilo, L. P., & Magdalon, J. (2026) · AJP Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00328.2025
Borromeo, J. L. A., Descartin, I. K. L., Morfe, A. S., et al. (2026) · International Conference on Education and Training Technologies (ICETT) · doi:10.1109/icett70124.2026.11665887
“Formal education is thus crucial for fostering awareness of digital content, while multimedia learning tools such as motion graphics have been shown to enhance engagement and comprehension effectively [7][8].”
Rivas, Y. M. P., Muriel, R. E. C., Teran, P. G. B., & Pardo, L. M. A. (2026) · Salud Medicina e Innovación Journal · doi:10.70577/yghkv767
Effectiveness of digital game-based learning in elementary education: A systematic literature review
Hasanah, F., Iriawan, S. B., Mulyasari, E., et al. (2026) · Primary Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar · doi:10.33578/jpfkip.v15i4.1036-1052
“Previous studies have demonstrated that DGBL can support conceptual understanding, learning motivation, and sustained engagement by embedding academic content within meaningful play activities (Bai et al., 2020; Sailer & Homner, 2020).”
Elfera, M., Hidayat, H., Sriwahyuni, T., & Indrawan, E. (2026) · Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA · doi:10.29303/jppipa.v12i8.15581
“Previous studies have reported the potential of programming and problem-based learning to support computational thinking, while gamification has been associated with increased motivation, self-efficacy, and student engagement (Bai et al., 2020; Yildirim, 2017).”
Kanadlı, S., & Tokmak, H. S. (2026) · Review of Education · doi:10.1002/rev3.70223
Li, C., Zhong, Y., Fryer, L. K., & Shum, A. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70320
Ariza, V. S., Ecito, M. G. G. G., & Adrales, L. P. (2026) · doi:10.68050/jams.2026.214
Supentri, S., Isjoni, I., Caska, C., & Erlinda, S. (2026) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.180069.3
Adirbekova, Z., Zhienbayeva, N., Serikbayeva, N., Zhanbyrbaevna, T. M., & Meiramova, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1947526
Taha, S. M. H., El-Magid, J. A., & Abusaad, F. (2026) · Child Care in Practice · doi:10.1080/13575279.2026.2723245
Sánchez, L. F., Miranda, D. P., Loyola, Á. P. H., Cárdenas, M. I., Maza, B. Q., Chingo, M. A., & Chingo, E. J. (2026) · VitalyScience Revista Científica Multidisciplinaria · doi:10.56519/ny076b75
“De forma similar, revisiones y metaanálisis enfocados específicamente en matemáticas han encontrado resultados positivos, aunque heterogéneos (31, 28, 10).”
Guo, L. (2026) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-026-14155-1
Leveraging Gamification Strategies in Human Resource Technology
Omar, K., Fakhouri, H. N., & Hamad, F. F. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-9599-9.ch012
Rencüzoğullari, A., & Koç, Y. (2026) · Buca eğitim fakültesi dergisi (Online)/Buca Eğitim Fakültesi dergisi · doi:10.53444/deubefd.1895135
Sutapa, I. N., Halim, S., Felecia, & Soetanto, D. P. (2026) · AAOU Journal/AAOU journal · doi:10.1108/aaouj-03-2026-0043 · Cited by 1
Designing an Intelligent Multimedia Vending Interface for Ethical-Choice Interaction
Pang, W. Y. J., & Wan, Y. C. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Information Processing and Retrieval (MIPR) · doi:10.1109/mipr70517.2026.00095
“Bai, Hew and Huang performed an extensive meta-analysis studies on gamification interventions in educational contexts, demonstrating modest positive impacts on behavioral outcomes [13].”
Short-term Impact of Online Platform Usability on Student Learnability: A Preliminary Study
Alharbi, M. N. (2026) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-39734-8_17
Latha, R. H., & Shekhar, S. K. (2026) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2026.1939666
Vu, T. M. H. (2026) · International Journal of Educational Management · doi:10.1108/ijem-04-2026-0612
Metadata
- Authors
- Bai, S., Hew, K. F., & Huang, B.
- Affiliations
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Corresponding author
- Hew, Khe Foon
- Venue
- Educational Research Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 30
- Pages
- 100322
- ISSN
- 1747-938X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3010425548
- Cited by
- 994
- References
- 190
- Citations by year
- 2026: 270 · 2025: 203 · 2024: 181 · 2023: 160 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 20
- FWCI
- 14.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Educational Research Review (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R25GM129219)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Games and Gamification
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Games and Media
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
- Keywords
- gamification, learning outcomes, academic performance, student engagement, joyful learning, performance feedback, recognition, goal setting, student anxiety, jealousy, educational technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review