The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An environmental impact assessment of economic complexity and energy consumption: Does institutional quality make a difference?
Abstract
Abstract The relationship between ecological footprint and economic complexity has important policy implications for environmental sustainability. Furthermore, institutional quality can be an imperative tool to ensure environmental sustainability, and it may also moderate the nexus between economic complexity and ecological footprint. Therefore, this study investigates the linkage between economic complexity, institutional quality, disaggregated energy consumption, and economic growth on environmental degradation in emerging countries from 1984 to 2017. In addition, it also probes the moderating effect of institutional quality in the nexus between economic complexity and footprint. To do so, the study applies an advanced econometric approach, cross-sectional autoregressive distributed lags (CS-ARDL) estimator, for short-run and long-run estimation, that allows heterogeneity in the slope parameters and dependencies across countries. The analytical outcomes demonstrate that economic complexity increases environmental degradation by exacerbating ecological footprint, while a high level of economic complexity mitigates ecological footprint. The findings of the study unfold that institutional quality supports environmental sustainability by reducing the ecological footprint. The outcomes also indicated that institutional quality promotes environmental sustainability by moderating the nexus between economic complexity and ecological degradation. Moreover, renewable energy is found to decrease ecological footprint, whereas non-renewable energy use leads to intensifying the ecological footprint. It was also found that there is an inverted u-shaped association between ecological footprint and economic growth. Based on the results, the study suggests that emerging countries should accelerate economic complexity along with a stronger institutional framework to combat environmental issues without compromising sustainable economic growth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence
Pesaran, M. H. (2007) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.951 · Cited by 12,787
Economic growth and the environment
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2118443 · Cited by 9,901
Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement
Grossman, G., & Krueger, A. (1991) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w3914 · Cited by 7,595
Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data*
Westerlund, J. (2007) · Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x · Cited by 6,113
Testing slope homogeneity in large panels
Hashem Pesaran, M., & Yamagata, T. (2008) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010 · Cited by 5,954
Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels
Dumitrescu, E.-I., & Hurlin, C. (2012) · Economic Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014 · Cited by 5,922
(2014) · doi:10.59327/ipcc/ar5-9789291691432 · Cited by 5,217
Estimation and Inference in Large Heterogeneous Panels with a Multifactor Error Structure
Pesaran, M. H. (2006) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x · Cited by 5,078
Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: A review
Panwar, N. L., Kaushik, S. C., & Kothari, S. (2011) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.037 · Cited by 3,897
The building blocks of economic complexity
Hidalgo, C. A., & Hausmann, R. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0900943106 · Cited by 3,372
Cited by
Pata, U. K., & Samour, A. (2022) · Progress in Nuclear Energy · doi:10.1016/j.pnucene.2022.104249 · Cited by 382
Zhang, C., Khan, I., Dagar, V., Saeed, A., & Zafar, M. W. (2022) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121570 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Majeed, A., & Huang, B.
- Venue
- Environmental Impact Assessment Review
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-07
- Volume
- 89
- Pages
- 106603
- ISSN
- 0195-9255 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3161017150
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 37.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An environmental impact assessment of economic complexity and energy consumption: Does institutional quality make a difference? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106603
- The paper
- Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Majeed, A., & Huang, B. (2021). An environmental impact assessment of economic complexity and energy consumption: Does institutional quality make a difference? Environmental Impact Assessment Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106603
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.