Cited by 140Global Cancer Incidence and ScreeningAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Trends in survival for childhood cancer in Britain diagnosed 1971–85

Open access
Stiller, CA, Bunch, KJ·1990·British Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Survival rates were analysed for a population-based series of over 15,000 childhood cancers registered in Great Britain during 1971-85. There were highly significant improvements (P less than 0.001 for trend) in survival for many major diagnostic groups. Between 1971-73 and 1983-85 the actuarial 5-year survival rates increased from 37% to 70% for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, from 4% to 26% for acute non-lymphoblastic leukaemia, from 76% to 88% for Hodgkin's disease, from 22% to 70% for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, from 61% to 72% for astrocytoma, from 24% to 42% for medulloblastoma, from 15% to 43% for neuroblastoma, from 58% to 79% for Wilms' tumour, from 17% to 54% for osteosarcoma, from 26% to 61% for rhabdomyosarcoma, from 59% to 94% for malignant testicular germ-cell tumours and from 43% to 77% for malignant ovarian germ-cell tumours. These increases in population-based survival rates reflect the substantial advances in treatment of a wide range of childhood cancers since 1970. The two principal diagnostic groups for which there was no evidence of any trend were retinoblastoma, which already had an excellent prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of over 85%, and Ewing's sarcoma, for which the survival rate remained below 45%.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/bjc.1990.383

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stiller, C., & Bunch, K.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
British Journal of Cancer
Published
1990-11
Volume
62
Issue
5
Pages
806-815
ISSN
  • 0007-0920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-1827
OpenAlex
W1994083133
Cited by
140
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
childhood cancer, cancer survival, survival trends, acute lymphoblastic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, Hodgkin's disease, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, astrocytoma, medulloblastoma, neuroblastoma, Wilms tumor, osteosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, germ cell tumors, retinoblastoma, Ewing sarcoma, cancer treatment advances
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Brain Neoplasms, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Infant, Kidney Neoplasms, Leukemia, Lymphoma, Male, Neoplasms, Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal, Soft Tissue Neoplasms, Time Factors, Survival Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review