Cited by 51Digital Mental Health InterventionsCancer survivorship and careArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Effect of a ChatGPT-based digital counseling intervention on anxiety and depression in patients with cancer: A prospective, randomized trial

Akdogan, Orhun, Uyar, Galip Can, Yesilbas, Enes, Baskurt, Kadriye, Malkoc, Nuri Alperen, Ozdemir, Nuriye, Yazici, Ozan, Oksuzoglu, Berna +3 more·2025·European Journal of Cancer

Abstract

Background Psychological distress is prevalent among newly diagnosed cancer patients, often exacerbating treatment-related anxiety and depression. Artificial intelligence (AI)-driven interventions, such as large language models (LLMs), offer scalable solutions for patient education. However, their effectiveness in mitigating psychological distress in oncology remains unverified.Methods We conducted a prospective, two-center, randomized controlled trial between July and October 2024 to evaluate the effect of a ChatGPT-based digital counseling intervention on anxiety and depression in chemotherapy-naïve cancer patients. Participants were randomized 1:1 to either a ChatGPT-assisted counseling group or a standard clinician-led education group. The primary outcome was the change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores before the second chemotherapy cycle. Secondary outcomes included patient engagement behavior and the accuracy of AI-generated responses. Multivariable logistic regression assessed independent predictors of anxiety and depression reduction. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06854315).Findings Of 196 screened patients, 160 were randomized (ChatGPT: n = 80; control: n = 80). The final cohort comprised 150 patients (median age: 64 years; 53.3 % female). At follow-up, the ChatGPT group exhibited significantly lower median HADS-Anxiety (6 [0-17] vs. 8 [1-17]; P = 0.002) and HADS-Depression (6 [0-20] vs. 9 [0-19]; P < 0.001) scores compared to controls. ChatGPT use was the strongest predictor of anxiety reduction (OR, 18.684; 95 % CI, 3.981-87.685; P < 0.001). AI responses were deemed appropriate in 88.5 % of cases, with inaccuracies most common in dietary and sexual health recommendations.Interpretation A ChatGPT-based counseling intervention significantly reduced anxiety and depression among newly diagnosed cancer patients prior to chemotherapy. These findings support the potential integration of AI-driven digital tools as adjuncts to conventional oncology education, enhancing patient support and engagement. Further research is needed to refine AI implementation in clinical practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115408

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akdogan, O., Uyar, G. C., Yesilbas, E., Baskurt, K., Malkoc, N. A., Ozdemir, N., Yazici, O., Oksuzoglu, B., Uner, A., Ozet, A., & Sutcuoglu, O.
Affiliations
  • Ankara Etlik City Hospital (TR)
  • Gazi University (TR)
Venue
European Journal of Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-05
Volume
221
Pages
115408
ISSN
0959-8049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4409187918
Cited by
45
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 8
FWCI
35.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
ChatGPT, large language models, anxiety, depression, psychological distress, cancer patients, chemotherapy-naive patients, patient engagement, AI response accuracy, cancer education
MeSH terms
Generative Artificial Intelligence, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Counseling, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Patient Education as Topic, Prospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review