The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new hybrid classification algorithm for customer churn prediction based on logistic regression and decision trees
Abstract
Abstract Decision trees and logistic regression are two very popular algorithms in customer churn prediction with strong predictive performance and good comprehensibility. Despite these strengths, decision trees tend to have problems to handle linear relations between variables and logistic regression has difficulties with interaction effects between variables. Therefore a new hybrid algorithm, the logit leaf model (LLM), is proposed to better classify data. The idea behind the LLM is that different models constructed on segments of the data rather than on the entire dataset lead to better predictive performance while maintaining the comprehensibility from the models constructed in the leaves. The LLM consists of two stages: a segmentation phase and a prediction phase. In the first stage customer segments are identified using decision rules and in the second stage a model is created for every leaf of this tree. This new hybrid approach is benchmarked against decision trees, logistic regression, random forests and logistic model trees with regards to the predictive performance and comprehensibility. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) and top decile lift (TDL) are used to measure the predictive performance for which LLM scores significantly better than its building blocks logistic regression and decision trees and performs at least as well as more advanced ensemble methods random forests and logistic model trees. Comprehensibility is addressed by a case study for which we observe some key benefits using the LLM compared to using decision trees or logistic regression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · Cited by 21,856
The WEKA data mining software: an update
Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I. H. (2009) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1656274.1656278 · Cited by 17,750
Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2000) · The Annals of Statistics · doi:10.1214/aos/1016218223 · Cited by 6,884
Customer Switching Behavior in Service Industries: An Exploratory Study
Keaveney, S. M. (1995) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252074 · Cited by 2,905
A Comparison of Alternative Tests of Significance for the Problem of $m$ Rankings
Friedman, M. (1940) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177731944 · Cited by 2,785
Gustafsson, A., Johnson, M. D., & Roos, I. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.210 · Cited by 1,576
Ganesh, J., Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2000) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.64.3.65.18028 · Cited by 1,305
Benchmarking state-of-the-art classification algorithms for credit scoring: an update of research
Lessmann, S., Baesens, B., Seow, H.-V., & Thomas, L. C. (2015) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.030 · Cited by 1,284
Defection detection: measuring and understanding the predictive accuracy of customer churn models
Neslin, S. A., Gupta, S., Kamakura, W., Lu, J., & Mason, C. H. (2006) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.2.204 · Cited by 574
Cited by
A survey on imbalanced learning: latest research, applications and future directions
Chen, W., Yang, K., Yu, Z., Shi, Y., & Chen, C. L. P. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-10759-6 · Cited by 506
Sheng, J., Amankwah‐Amoah, J., Khan, Z., & Wang, X. (2021) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12441 · Cited by 369
Event Prediction in the Big Data Era: A Systematic Survey
Zhao, L. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3450287 · Cited by 135
Coussement, K., Phan, M., De Caigny, A., Benoit, D. F., & Raes, A. (2020) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2020.113325 · Cited by 125
Self-citationDomingos, E., Ojeme, B., & Daramola, O. (2021) · Computation · doi:10.3390/computation9030034 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- De Caigny, A., Coussement, K., & De Bock, K. W.
- Venue
- European Journal of Operational Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-09
- Volume
- 269
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 760-772
- ISSN
- 0377-2217 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2792328488
- Cited by
- 524
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 83.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new hybrid classification algorithm for customer churn prediction based on logistic regression and decision trees. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.009
- The paper
- De Caigny, A., Coussement, K., & De Bock, K. W. (2018). A new hybrid classification algorithm for customer churn prediction based on logistic regression and decision trees. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.