Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 257

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A randomised controlled trial with prolonged‐release oral oxycodone and naloxone to prevent and reverse opioid‐induced constipation

Meissner, Winfried, Leyendecker, Petra, Mueller‐Lissner, Stefan, Nadstawek, Joachim, Hopp, Michael, Ruckes, Christian, Wirz, Stefan, Fleischer, Wolfgang, Reimer, Karen·2009·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

Background:Opioid‐induced constipation can have a major negative impact on patients’ quality of life. This randomised, double‐blinded study evaluated the analgesic efficacy of prolonged‐release (PR) oral oxycodone when co‐administered with PR oral naloxone, and its impact on opioid‐induced constipation in patients with severe chronic pain. Another objective was to identify the optimal dose ratio of oxycodone and naloxone. Methods:A total of 202 patients with chronic pain (mainly non‐cancer related, 2.5% of patients had cancer‐related pain) under stable oral oxycodone therapy (40, 60 or 80mg/day) were randomised to receive 10, 20, 40mg/day naloxone or placebo. After a 4‐week maintenance phase, patients received oxycodone only for 2 weeks. Pain intensity was evaluated using a numerical analogue scale and bowel function was assessed using the bowel function index. Results:No loss of analgesic efficacy with naloxone was observed. Mean pain intensity scores on randomisation were comparable for placebo, 10mg, 20mg and 40mg naloxone dose, and remained unchanged during treatment. Bowel function improved with increasing naloxone dose. Naloxone 20mg and 40mg significantly improved bowel function at the end of the maintenance phase compared with placebo (p<0.05). Overall, the combination was well tolerated, with no unexpected adverse events. There was a trend towards an increased incidence of diarrhoea with higher doses of naloxone. The 2:1 oxycodone/naloxone ratio was identified as the most suitable for further development. Conclusion:Co‐administration of PR oral naloxone and PR oral oxycodone is associated with a significant improvement in bowel function compared with PR oral oxycodone alone, with no reduction in the analgesic efficacy of oxycodone.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.06.012

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 257

Metadata

Authors
Meissner, W., Leyendecker, P., Mueller‐Lissner, S., Nadstawek, J., Hopp, M., Ruckes, C., Wirz, S., Fleischer, W., & Reimer, K.
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
56-64
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W2163255559
Cited by
257
References
20
FWCI
27.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A randomised controlled trial with prolonged‐release oral oxycodone and naloxone to prevent and reverse opioid‐induced constipation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.06.012
The paper
Meissner, W., Leyendecker, P., Mueller‐Lissner, S., Nadstawek, J., Hopp, M., Ruckes, C., Wirz, S., Fleischer, W., & Reimer, K. (2009). A randomised controlled trial with prolonged‐release oral oxycodone and naloxone to prevent and reverse opioid‐induced constipation. European Journal of Pain. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.06.012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.