Do people like to feel ‘neutral’?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People accept much broader thermal conditions than anticipated by standards, and their perception of thermal conditions is much more dynamic.
“At the same time, research has shown that people accept much broader thermal conditions than anticipated by above standards [1,3,14,47], andtheir perception of thermal conditions is much more dynamic [48–51].”
From Drivers of diversity in human thermal perception – A review for holistic comfort models (2018) · cites this paper as [47]
Cites
(1998) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 1,934 · see citing works
Fox, R. H., Woodward, P. M., Exton‐Smith, A. N., Green, M. F., Donnison, D., & Wicks, M. H. (1973) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.1.5847.200 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of human thermal comfort in the built environment
Rupp, R. F., Vásquez, N. G., & Lamberts, R. (2015) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.07.047 · Cited by 907 · see citing works
Forty years of Fanger’s model of thermal comfort: comfort for all?
van Hoof, J. (2008) · Indoor Air · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2007.00516.x · Cited by 733 · see citing works
Individual difference in thermal comfort: A literature review
Wang, Z., de Dear, R., Luo, M., Lin, B., He, Y., Ghahramani, A., & Zhu, Y. (2018) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.040 · Cited by 675 · see citing works
Thermal comfort and gender: a literature review
Karjalainen, S. (2012) · Indoor Air · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0668.2011.00747.x · Cited by 536 · see citing works
Field studies on human thermal comfort — An overview
Mishra, A. K., & Ramgopal, M. (2013) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.02.015 · Cited by 336 · see citing works
Drivers of diversity in human thermal perception – A review for holistic comfort models
Schweiker, M., Huebner, G. M., Kingma, B. R. M., Kramer, R., & Pallubinsky, H. (2018) · Temperature · doi:10.1080/23328940.2018.1534490 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Thermal comfort of heterogeneous and dynamic indoor conditions — An overview
Mishra, A. K., Loomans, M. G. L. C., & Hensen, J. L. M. (2016) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.09.016 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
- Authors
- Humphreys, M. A., & Hancock, M.
- Affiliations
- Oxford Brookes University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Humphreys, Michael A
- ORCID
- Humphreys, Michael A
- Venue
- Energy and Buildings
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 867-874
- ISSN
- 0378-7788 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W111007040
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 15.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Energy and Buildings (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Oxford Brookes University
- University of Oxford
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building energy efficiency and sustainability
- Keywords
- thermal comfort, thermal simulation, building energy consumption, university lectures, dwelling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
