Cited by 675Building Energy and Comfort OptimizationUrban Heat Island MitigationThermoregulation and physiological responses

Individual difference in thermal comfort: A literature review

Wang, Zhe, de Dear, Richard, Luo, Maohui, Lin, Borong, He, Yingdong, Ghahramani, Ali, Zhu, Yingxin·2018·Building and Environment

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.04.040

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Wang and Schweiker independently surveyed sources of diversity in human thermal perception and dedicated a paragraph to circadian rhythms related to variations in core body temperature, but none focused specifically on reviewing studies investigating dependency of thermal perception on time of day.

    “Wang [24] and Schweiker [25] independently surveyed sources of diversity in human thermal perception and dedicated a paragraph to circadian rhythms related to variations in core body temperature. However, none of these works focused specifically on reviewing studies investigating the dependency of thermal perception on the time of day.”

    From Human thermal perception and time of day: A review (2021) · cites this paper as [24]

  • Five review papers were identified that discuss the influence of age on preferred temperature or synonymous concepts such as neutral temperature or thermal comfort.

    “Five review papers have been identified that discuss the influence of age on preferred temperature or synonymous concepts such as neutral temperature or thermal comfort (Table 3) [58–62].”
  • A systematic review by Wang et al. [62], presenting results from eleven laboratory and 25 field studies, found no significant differences in neutral temperature between men and women in nine out of eleven laboratory studies and in 18 out of 25 field studies.

    “For neutral temperature, however, a systematic review by Wang et al. [62], presenting results from eleven laboratory and 25 field studies, found no significant differences between men and women in nine out of eleven laboratory studies and in 18 out of 25 field studies.”
  • The review results by Wang et al. [62] finding around 75% of studies reporting no sex differences can be explained by the overlap of the pdfTNZ for males and females (Figure 4(a,b)).

    “With this respect, the review results by Wang et al. [62] finding around 75% of studies reporting no sex differences can be explained by the overlap of the pdfTNZ for males and females (Figure 4(a,b)).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Z., de Dear, R., Luo, M., Lin, B., He, Y., Ghahramani, A., & Zhu, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Hunan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Luo, Maohui
  • Lin, Borong
Venue
Building and Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-06
Volume
138
Pages
181-193
ISSN
0360-1323 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2801052353
Cited by
675
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 98 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 101 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 63 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 16
FWCI
39.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Building and Environment (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (5151101128)
  • China Scholarship Council (201706130019)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Thermoregulation and physiological responses
Keywords
thermal comfort, individual differences, neutral temperature, thermal preference, sex differences, age differences, fieldwork

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review