Cited by 733Building Energy and Comfort OptimizationUrban Heat Island MitigationFacilities and Workplace Management

Forty years of Fanger’s model of thermal comfort: comfort for all?

Open access
van Hoof, J.·2008·Indoor Air

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The predicted mean vote (PMV) model of thermal comfort, created by Fanger in the late 1960s, is used worldwide to assess thermal comfort. Fanger based his model on college-aged students for use in invariant environmental conditions in air-conditioned buildings in moderate thermal climate zones. Environmental engineering practice calls for a predictive method that is applicable to all types of people in any kind of building in every climate zone. In this publication, existing support and criticism, as well as modifications to the PMV model are discussed in light of the requirements by environmental engineering practice in the 21st century in order to move from a predicted mean vote to comfort for all. Improved prediction of thermal comfort can be achieved through improving the validity of the PMV model, better specification of the model's input parameters, and accounting for outdoor thermal conditions and special groups. The application range of the PMV model can be enlarged, for instance, by using the model to assess the effects of the thermal environment on productivity and behavior, and interactions with other indoor environmental parameters, and the use of information and communication technologies. Even with such modifications to thermal comfort evaluation, thermal comfort for all can only be achieved when occupants have effective control over their own thermal environment. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The paper treats the assessment of thermal comfort using the PMV model of Fanger, and deals with the strengths and limitations of this model. Readers are made familiar to some opportunities for use in the 21st-century information society.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2007.00516.x

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Van Hoof's later review established that differences in preferred ambient temperatures were evident in several studies, stating that older people preferred higher temperatures, which the author ascribed to lower activity levels and lower basal metabolic rate.

    “In contrast, a later review by van Hoof [61] established that differences in preferred ambient temperatures were evident in several studies, stating that older people preferred higher temperatures, which the author ascribed to lower activity levels and lower basal metabolic rate.”
  • Five review papers were identified that discuss the influence of age on preferred temperature or synonymous concepts such as neutral temperature or thermal comfort.

    “Five review papers have been identified that discuss the influence of age on preferred temperature or synonymous concepts such as neutral temperature or thermal comfort (Table 3) [58–62].”
  • Most original studies identified by the review papers presented in Table 4 report women to be more sensitive to temperature fluctuations, women to be more often dissatisfied than men, women to have smaller comfort zones and to be more often uncomfortably hot or cold than men.

    “In summary, most original studies identified by the review papers presented in Table 4 report women to be more sensitive to temperature fluctuations, women to be more often dissatisfied than men, women to have smaller comfort zones and to be more often uncomfortably hot or cold than men [59–61,67].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Arau´jo, V.M.D. and Arau´jo, E.H.S. (1999) The applicability of ISO 7730 for the assessment of the thermal conditions of users of the buildings in Natal-Brazil. In: Raw, G., Aizlewood, C. and Warren, P. (eds) Proceedings of Indoor Air Õ99, Vol. 2, Edinburgh, 148-153.
  2. Croome, D.J., Gan, G. and Awbi, H.B. (1993) Thermal comfort and air quality in offices. In: Jaakkola, J.J.K., Ilmarinen, R. and Seppa¨nen, O. (eds) Proceedings of Indoor Air Ô93, Vol. 6, Helsinki, 37-42.
  3. Ealiwa, M.A., Taki, A.H., Howarth, A.T. and Seden, M.R. (1999) Field investiga- tion of thermal comfort in both naturally and mechanically ventilated buildings in Ghadames, Libya. In: Raw, G., Aizle- wood, C. and Warren, P. (eds) Proceed- ings of Indoor Air Õ99, Vol. 2, Edinburgh, 166-171.
  4. Fan, Y., Lang, S. and Xu, W. (1993) Field study on acceptable thermal conditions for residential buildings in transition zone of China. In: Jaakkola, J.J.K., Ilmarinen, R. and Seppa¨nen, O. (eds) Proceedings of Indoor Air Õ93, Vol. 6, Helsinki, 109-114.
  5. Fanger, P.O. (1984) The philosophy behind a comfort standard. In: Berglund, B., Lindvall, T. and Sundell, J. (eds) Pro- ceedings of Indoor Air Õ84, Vol. 1, Stock- holm, 91-98.
  6. Fanger, P.O. (1994) How to apply models predicting thermal sensation and dis- comfort in practice. In: Oseland, N.A. and Humphreys, M.A. (eds) Proceedings Thermal Comfort, Past, Present and Future, Garston, 11-17.
  7. Feriadi, H. and Hien, W.N. (2003) Model- ling thermal comfort for tropics using fuzzy logic. In: Hensen, J.L.M. and Augenbroe, G. (eds) Proceedings Building Simulation 2003, Vol. 1, Eindhoven, 323- 330.
  8. Haghighat, F., Donnini, G., Megri, A.C. and Giorgi, G. (1999) Prediction of thermal perception of disabled persons vs mea- surement. In: Raw, G., Aizlewood, C. and Warren, P. (eds) Proceedings of Indoor Air Õ999, Vol. 2, Edinburgh, 113-118.
  9. Ishii, A., Iwamoto, S., Sakai, E., Katayama, T. and Tsutsumi, J. (1993) The effect of humidity reduction on thermal sensa- tions. In: Jaakkola, J.J.K., Ilmarinen, R. and Seppa¨nen, O. (eds) Proceedings of Indoor Air Õ93, Vol. 6, Helsinki, 115-120.
  10. Iwamoto, S. and Yoneki, T. (1999) Indoor thermal environment in transient condi- tion. In: Raw, G., Aizlewood, C. and Warren, P. (eds) Proceedings of Indoor Air Õ99, Vol. 2, Edinburgh, 178-183.
  11. Kimura, K. and Tanabe, S. (1993) Re- commended air velocity against combi- nations of temperature and humidity for sedentary occupants in summer clothing. In: Jaakkola, J.J.K., Ilmarinen, R. and Seppa¨nen, O. (eds) Proceedings of Indoor Air Õ93, Vol. 6, Helsinki, 61-66.
  12. Kimura, K., Tanabe, S. and Iwata, T. (1994) Climate chamber studies for hot and humid regions. In: Oseland, N.A. and Humphreys, M.A. (eds) Proceedings Thermal Comfort, Past, Present and Future, Garston, 88-105.
  13. Luscuere, P.G. and Borst, V. (2002) Air- conditioning in nursing homes till death do us part? In: Levin, H. (ed.) Proceedings of Indoor Air Õ02, Vol. 1, Monterey, 1032- 1037.
  14. Mayer, E. (1997) A new correlation between predicted mean votes (PMV) and pre- dicted percentages of dissatisfied (PPD). In: Woods, J.E., Grimsrud, D.T. and Boschi, N. (eds) Proceedings of Healthy Buildings/IAQ Õ97, Vol. 2, Washington, 189-194.
  15. McIntyre, D.A. (1984) Evaluation of thermal discomfort. In: Berglund, B., Lindvall, T. and Sundell, J. (eds) Proceedings of Indoor Air Õ84, Vol. 1, Stockholm, 147-158.
  16. Olesen, B.W. and Nielsen, R. (1984) A comparison of the thermal insulation measured on a thermal manikin and on human subjects. In: Berglund, B., Lind- vall, T. and Sundell, J. (eds) Proceedings of Indoor Air Õ84, Vol. 5, Stockholm, 315- 320.
  17. Oseland, N.A. (1996) Thermal comfort in naturally ventilated versus air-condi- tioned offices. In: Yoshizawa, S., Kimura, K., Ikeda, K., Tanabe, S. and Iwata, T. (eds) Proceedings of Indoor Air Õ96, Vol. 1, Tokyo, 215-220.
  18. Paciuk, M. and Becker, R. (2002) Predicted vs. recorded summer thermal responses in air-conditioned and naturally ventilated dwellings in Israel. In: Levin, H. (ed.) Proceedings of Indoor Air Õ02, Vol. 5, Monterey, 104-109.
  19. Jaakkola, J.J.K., Ilmarinen, R. and Sep- pa¨nen, O. (eds) Proceedings of Indoor Air Õ93, Vol. 6, Helsinki, 43-48.
  20. Sassa, N., Kubo, H., Isoda, N. and Yanase, T. (1999) The individual differences of preferred air temperature at the direct determination and exposure to estab- lished air temperature. In: Raw, G., Aizlewood, C. and Warren, P. (eds) Proceedings of Indoor Air Õ99, Vol. 1, Edinburgh, 638-643.
  21. Tanabe, S., Hasebe, Y. and Kimura, K. (1993) Reduction of clo value with increased air movement. In: Jaakkola, J.J.K., Ilmarinen, R. and Seppa¨nen, O. (eds) Proceedings of Indoor Air Õ93, Vol. 6, Helsinki, 139-144.
  22. Williams, R.N. (1995) A field investigation of thermal comfort, environmental satisfaction and perceived control levels in UK office buildings. In: Maroni, M. (ed.) Proceedings of Healthy Buildings Õ95, Vol. 3, Milan, 1181-1186.
  23. Wyon, D.P. (1994) Assessment of human thermal requirements in the thermal comfort region. In: Oseland, N.A. and Humphreys, M.A. (eds) Proceedings Thermal Comfort, Past, Present and Future, Garston, 144-156.
  24. Yoon, D.W., Sohn, J.Y. and Cho, K.H. (1999) The comparison on the thermal comfort sensation between the results of questionnaire survey and the calculation of the PMV values. In: Raw, G., Aizle- wood, C. and Warren, P. (eds) Proceed- ings of Indoor Air Õ99, Vol. 2, Edinburgh, 137-141.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Hoof, J.
Venue
Indoor Air
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-06
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
182-201
ISSN
  • 0905-6947 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0668
OpenAlex
W2107186450
Cited by
733
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 55 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 19
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Indoor Air (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Facilities and Workplace Management
Keywords
thermal comfort, predicted mean vote, Fanger model, thermal comfort prediction, special groups, indoor environmental quality, information and communication technologies, model validity
MeSH terms
Air Conditioning, Environment, Facility Design and Construction, Humans, Models, Biological, Thermosensing, Workplace

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review