Cited by 89Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling SystemsAdvanced Thermodynamic Systems and EnginesSpacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies

Cryogenics-based energy storage: Evaluation of cold exergy recovery cycles

Hamdy, Sarah, Morosuk, Tatiana, Tsatsaronis, George·2017·Energy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.118

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hamdy, S., Morosuk, T., & Tsatsaronis, G.
Affiliations
Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Hamdy, Sarah
Venue
Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-11
Volume
138
Pages
1069-1080
ISSN
0360-5442 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2739149138
Cited by
89
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 2
FWCI
6.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Energy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Berliner Programm zur Förderung der Chancengleichheit von Frauen in Forschung und Lehre
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Advanced Thermodynamic Systems and Engines
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
Keywords
cryogenic energy storage, liquid air, direct expansion, organic Rankine cycle, exergy analysis, round-trip efficiency, energy density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review