CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 74

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Environmental performance of end-of-life handling alternatives for paper-and-pulp-mill sludge: Using digestate as a source of energy or for biochar production

Mohammadi, Ali, Sandberg, Maria, Venkatesh, G., Eskandari, Samieh, Dalgaard, Tommy, Joseph, Stephen, Granström, Karin·2019·Energy
DOI 10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.065
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.065

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Fuglesang, 2015, vol. 218
  2. Nzihou, 2013, The fate of heavy metals during combustion and gasification of contaminated biomass—a brief review, J Hazard Mater, 256–257, 56, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.02.050 · DOI
  3. Shi, 2013, Immobilization of heavy metals in sewage sludge by using subcritical water technology, Bioresour Technol, 137, 18, 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.03.106 · DOI
  4. Lu, 2016, Characteristic of heavy metals in biochar derived from sewage sludge, J Mater Cycles Waste Manag, 18, 725, 10.1007/s10163-015-0366-y · DOI
  5. Cao, 2012, Sewage sludge-to-energy approaches based on anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis: brief overview and energy efficiency assessment, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 16, 1657, 10.1016/j.rser.2011.12.014 · DOI
  6. Matovic, 2011, Biochar as a viable carbon sequestration option: global and Canadian perspective, Energy, 36, 2011, 10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.031 · DOI
  7. Li, 2018, Effects of biochar application in forest ecosystems on soil properties and greenhouse gas emissions: a review, J Soils Sediments, 18, 546, 10.1007/s11368-017-1906-y · DOI
  8. Suh, 2002, An LCA of alternative wastewater sludge treatment scenarios, Resour Conserv Recycl, 35, 191, 10.1016/S0921-3449(01)00120-3 · DOI
  9. Ibarrola, 2012, Pyrolysis biochar systems for recovering biodegradable materials: a life cycle carbon assessment, Waste Manag, 32, 859, 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.10.005 · DOI
  10. Deviatkin, 2016, Comparative life cycle assessment of deinking sludge utilization alternatives, J Clean Prod, 112, 3232, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.022 · DOI
  11. Lopes, 2003, Application of life cycle assessment to the Portuguese pulp and paper industry, J Clean Prod, 11, 51, 10.1016/S0959-6526(02)00005-7 · DOI
  12. Poinot, 2018, Beneficial use of boiler ash in alkali-activated bricks, Resour Conserv Recycl, 128, 1, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.013 · DOI
  13. Deviatkin, 2017, Comparative life cycle assessment of thermal residue recycling on a regional scale: a case study of South-East Finland, J Clean Prod, 149, 275, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.087 · DOI
  14. Nascimento, 2016, A comprehensive approach for obtaining cellulose nanocrystal from coconut fiber. Part II: environmental assessment of technological pathways, Ind Crops Prod, 93, 58, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.02.063 · DOI
  15. Sebastião, 2016, Life cycle assessment of advanced bioethanol production from pulp and paper sludge, Bioresour Technol, 208, 100, 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.049 · DOI
  16. Bernier, 2013, Life cycle assessment of kraft lignin for polymer applications, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 18, 520, 10.1007/s11367-012-0503-y · DOI
  17. González-García, 2011, Environmental life cycle assessment of a Swedish dissolving pulp mill integrated biorefinery, J Ind Ecol, 15, 568, 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2011.00354.x · DOI
  18. Likon, 2012, The conversion of paper mill sludge into absorbent for oil spill sanitation – the life cycle assessment, Macromol Symp, 320, 50, 10.1002/masy.201251006 · DOI
  19. Mohammadi, 2019, Environmental analysis of producing biochar and energy recovery from pulp and paper mill biosludge, J Ind Ecol, 10.1111/jiec.12838 · DOI
  20. Stoica, 2009, Energy use and recovery strategies within wastewater treatment and sludge handling at pulp and paper mills, Bioresour Technol, 100, 3497, 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.02.041 · DOI
  21. Møller, 2009, Anaerobic digestion and digestate use: accounting of greenhouse gases and global warming contribution, Waste Manag Res, 27, 813, 10.1177/0734242X09344876 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Starr, 2012, Life cycle assessment of biogas upgrading technologies, Waste Manag, 32, 991, 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.12.016 · DOI
  23. Toledo, 2005, The partitioning of heavy metals in incineration of sludges and waste in a bubbling fluidized bed: 2. Interpretation of results with a conceptual model, J Hazard Mater, 126, 158, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.06.021 · DOI
  24. Latosińska, 2012, The effect of incineration temperatures on mobility of heavy metals in sewage sludge ash, Environ Protect Eng, 38, 31, 10.37190/epe120304 · DOI
  25. Devi, 2014, Risk analysis of pyrolyzed biochar made from paper mill effluent treatment plant sludge for bioavailability and eco-toxicity of heavy metals, Bioresour Technol, 162, 308, 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.093 · DOI
  26. Li, 2018, Life cycle assessment of the environmental impacts and energy efficiency of an integration of sludge anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis, J Clean Prod, 195, 476, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.259 · DOI
  27. Sparrevik, 2013, Life cycle assessment to evaluate the environmental impact of biochar implementation in conservation agriculture in Zambia, Environ Sci Technol, 47, 1206, 10.1021/es302720k · DOI
  28. Jacobson, 2010, An assessment of different fertilization regimes in three boreal coniferous stands, Silva Fenn, 44, 815, 10.14214/sf.123 · DOI
  29. Jeffery, 2016, Biochar effects on methane emissions from soils: a meta-analysis, Soil Biol Biochem, 101, 251, 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.07.021 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Yu, 2013, Effects of biochar application on soil methane emission at different soil moisture levels, Biol Fertil Soils, 49, 119, 10.1007/s00374-012-0703-4 · DOI
  31. Maljanen, 2006, Methane and nitrous oxide fluxes, and carbon dioxide production in boreal forest soil fertilized with wood ash and nitrogen, Soil Use Manag, 22, 151, 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2006.00029.x · DOI
  32. Jolliet, 2003, IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology, Int J Life Cycle Assess, 8, 324, 10.1007/BF02978505 · DOI
  33. Mohammadi, 2017, Climate-change and health effects of using rice husk for biochar-compost: comparing three pyrolysis systems, J Clean Prod, 162, 260, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.026 · DOI
  34. Ramachandran, 2017, Life cycle assessment of a sewage sludge and woody biomass co-gasification system, Energy, 137, 369, 10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.139 · DOI
  35. Edwards, 2017, Anaerobic co-digestion of municipal food waste and sewage sludge: a comparative life cycle assessment in the context of a waste service provision, Bioresour Technol, 223, 237, 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.10.044 · DOI
  36. Bailis, 2013, Innovation in charcoal production: a comparative life-cycle assessment of two kiln technologies in Brazil, Energy for Sustainable Development, 17, 189, 10.1016/j.esd.2012.10.008 · DOI
  37. Brassard, 2018, Pyrolysis of switchgrass in an auger reactor for biochar production: a greenhouse gas and energy impacts assessment, Biomass Bioenergy, 116, 99, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.06.007 · DOI
  38. Jin, 2016, Influence of pyrolysis temperature on properties and environmental safety of heavy metals in biochars derived from municipal sewage sludge, J Hazard Mater, 320, 417, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.08.050 · DOI
  39. Hong, 2009, Environmental and economic life cycle assessment for sewage sludge treatment processes in Japan, Waste Manag, 29, 696, 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.03.026 · DOI
  40. Hospido, 2010, Environmental assessment of anaerobically digested sludge reuse in agriculture: potential impacts of emerging micropollutants, Water Res, 44, 3225, 10.1016/j.watres.2010.03.004 · DOI
  41. Mohammadi, 2016, Biochar use for climate-change mitigation in rice cropping systems, J Clean Prod, 116, 61, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.083 · DOI
  42. Ji, 2018, Environmental and economic assessment of crop residue competitive utilization for biochar, briquette fuel and combined heat and power generation, J Clean Prod, 192, 916, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.026 · DOI
  43. Zhang, 2014, Reviewing the anaerobic digestion of food waste for biogas production, Renew Sustain Energy Rev, 38, 383, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.05.038 · DOI
  44. Mohammadi, 2016, Quantifying the greenhouse gas reduction benefits of utilising straw biochar and enriched biochar, Energy Procedia, 97, 254, 10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.069 · DOI
  45. Ding, 2010, Evaluation of biochar effects on nitrogen retention and leaching in multi-layered soil columns, Water, Air, Soil Pollut, 213, 47, 10.1007/s11270-010-0366-4 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Brassard, 2016, Soil biochar amendment as a climate change mitigation tool: key parameters and mechanisms involved, J Environ Manag, 181, 484
  47. Chen, 2018, A comparative study on behavior of heavy metals in pyrochar and hydrochar from sewage sludge, Energy Sources, Part A Recovery, Util Environ Eff, 40, 565, 10.1080/15567036.2017.1399173 · DOI
  48. Dai, 2017, Potential role of biochars in decreasing soil acidification - a critical review, Sci Total Environ, 581–582, 601, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.169 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Kochian, 2015, Plant adaptation to acid soils: the molecular basis for crop aluminum resistance, Annu Rev Plant Biol, 66, 571, 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043014-114822 · DOI
  50. Devi, 2013, Effect of temperature on biochar properties during paper mill sludge pyrolysis, International Journal of ChemTech Research, 5, 682
  51. Chen, 2014, Influence of pyrolysis temperature on characteristics and heavy metal adsorptive performance of biochar derived from municipal sewage sludge, Bioresour Technol, 164, 47, 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.048 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Méndez, 2012, Effects of sewage sludge biochar on plant metal availability after application to a Mediterranean soil, Chemosphere, 89, 1354, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.05.092 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Hossain, 2010, Agronomic properties of wastewater sludge biochar and bioavailability of metals in production of cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum), Chemosphere, 78, 1167, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.01.009 · DOI
  54. Basso, 2013, Assessing potential of biochar for increasing water-holding capacity of sandy soils, GCB Bioenergy, 5, 132, 10.1111/gcbb.12026 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Mohammadi, 2017, Biochar addition in rice farming systems: economic and energy benefits, Energy, 140, 415, 10.1016/j.energy.2017.08.116 · DOI
  56. Sun, 2014, Combined effects of nitrogen deposition and biochar application on emissions of N2O, CO2 and NH3 from agricultural and forest soils, Soil Sci Plant Nutr, 60, 254, 10.1080/00380768.2014.885386 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mohammadi, A., Sandberg, M., Venkatesh, G., Eskandari, S., Dalgaard, T., Joseph, S., & Granström, K.
Venue
Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
182
Pages
594-605
ISSN
0360-5442
DOI
10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.065
Cited by
74
References
5
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • Swedish Agency for Economic and Regional Growth (20201239)
  • Interreg Sweden-Norway program (20200023)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review