Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 499

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

“Fracking” controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing

Boudet, Hilary, Clarke, Christopher, Bugden, Dylan, Maibach, Edward, Roser-Renouf, Connie, Leiserowitz, Anthony·2014·Energy Policy
DOI 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.017
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.017

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Anderson, 2009, Local leaders' perceptions of energy development in the Barnett shale, South. Rural Sociol., 24, 113
  2. Ansolabehere, 2009, Public attitudes toward construction of new power plants, Public. Opin. Q., 73, 566, 10.1093/poq/nfp041 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Armstrong, 1995, Advanced fracturing fluids improve well economics, Oilfield Rev., 7, 34
  4. Besley, 2010, Current research on public perceptions of nanotechnology, Emerg. Health Threats J., 3
  5. Boudet, 2011, From NIMBY to NIABY: regional mobilization against liquefied natural gas in the United States, Env. Polit., 20, 786, 10.1080/09644016.2011.617166 · DOI
  6. Boudet, 2010, A tale of two sitings: contentious politics in liquefied natural gas facility siting in California, J. Plan. Educ. Res., 30, 5, 10.1177/0739456X10373079 · DOI
  7. Brasier, 2011, Residents' perceptions of community and environmental impacts from development of natural gas in the Marcellus Shale: a comparison of Pennsylvania and New York cases, J. Rural Social Sci., 26, 32
  8. Brown, 2005, The boom-bust-recovery cycle: dynamics of change in community satisfaction and social integration in Delta, Utah, Rural Sociol., 70, 28, 10.1526/0036011053294673 · doi:10.1526/0036011053294673
  9. Cacciatore, 2012, Coverage of emerging technologies: a comparison between print and online media, New Media Soc., 14, 1039, 10.1177/1461444812439061 · DOI
  10. Callegaro, 2008, Computing response metrics for online panels, Public Opin. Q., 72, 1008, 10.1093/poq/nfn065 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Clarke, 2012, Emerging risk communication challenges associated with natural gas development in shale formations, Eur. J. Risk Regul., 3, 424, 10.1017/S1867299X00002348 · doi:10.1017/s1867299x00002348
  12. Dake, 1991, Orienting dispositions in the perception of risk an analysis of contemporary worldviews and cultural biases, J. Cross. Cult. Psychol., 22, 61, 10.1177/0022022191221006 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Dake, 1992, Myths of nature: culture and the social construction of risk, J. Social, Issues 48, 21
  14. Davis, 2012, Federalizing energy? Agenda change and the politics of fracking, Policy Sci., 45, 221, 10.1007/s11077-012-9156-8 · doi:10.1007/s11077-012-9156-8
  15. Devine-Wright, 2005, Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy, Wind Energy, 8, 125, 10.1002/we.124 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Dobb, 2013, The new oil landscape, Natl. Geogr. Mag., 223, 28
  17. Driedger, 2007, Risk and the media: a comparison of print and televised news stories of a Canadian drinking water risk event, Risk Anal.: Off. Publ. Soc. Risk Anal., 27, 775, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00922.x · DOI
  18. Evensen, D., Clarke, C., Stedman, R., 2013. A New York or Pennsylvania state of mind: social representations of gas development in the Marcellus Shale. J. Environ. Stud. Sci., (in press). · doi:10.1007/s13412-013-0153-9
  19. Firestone, 2007, Public opinion about large offshore wind power: underlying factors, Energy Policy, 35, 1584, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.010 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Flynn, 1994, Gender, race, and perception of environmental health risks, Risk Anal., 14, 1101, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00082.x · DOI · Paper page
  21. Flynn, 1998, Risk, media, and stigma at rocky flats, Risk Anal., 18, 715, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb01115.x · doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb01115.x
  22. Futrell, 2003, Framing processes, cognitive liberation, and NIMBY protest in the U.S. Chemical-weapons disposal conflict, Sociol. Inq., 73, 359, 10.1111/1475-682X.00061 · doi:10.1111/1475-682x.00061
  23. Gerhards, 2010, Is the internet a better public sphere? Comparing old and new media in the USA and Germany, New Media Soc., 12, 143, 10.1177/1461444809341444 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Haut, 2010, Balancing environmental tradeoffs, societal issues, and energy production, Gulf Coast Assoc. Geol. Soc. Trans., 60, 739
  25. Ho, 2013, Factors Influencing Public Risk–Benefit Considerations of Nanotechnology: Assessing the Effects of Mass Media, Interpersonal Communication, and Elaborative Processing, Public Understanding of Science, 22, 606, 10.1177/0963662511417936 · DOI
  26. Hultman, 2011, The greenhouse impact of unconventional gas for electricity generation, Environ. Res. Lett., 6, 049504, 10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/049504 · DOI
  27. Hunter, 1995, Beyond NIMBY, Policy Stud. J., 23, 601, 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1995.tb00537.x · DOI · Paper page
  28. Jacquet, 2012, Landowner attitudes toward natural gas and wind farm development in northern Pennsylvania, Energy Policy, 50, 677, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.011 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Johansson, 2007, Intention to respond to local wind turbines: the role of attitudes and visual perception, Wind Energy, 10, 435, 10.1002/we.232 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Kahan, 2007, Culture and identity-protective cognition: explaining the white-male effect in risk perception, J. Empir. Leg. Stud., 4, 465, 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00097.x · DOI · Paper page
  31. Kahan, 2009, Cultural cognition of the risks and benefits of nanotechnology, Nat. Nanotechnol., 4, 87, 10.1038/nnano.2008.341 · DOI
  32. Kargbo, 2010, Natural gas plays in the marcellus shale: challenges and potential opportunities, Environ. Sci. Technol., 44, 5679, 10.1021/es903811p · DOI · Paper page
  33. Keller, 2012, Affective imagery and acceptance of replacing nuclear power plants, Risk Anal., 32, 464, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01691.x · DOI
  34. Klick, 2010, Public understanding of and support for wind power in the United States, Renew. Energy, 35, 1585, 10.1016/j.renene.2009.11.028 · DOI
  35. Krannich, 2012, Social change in natural resource-based rural communities: the evolution of sociological research and knowledge as influenced by William R. Freudenburg, J.f Environ. Stud. Sci., 2, 18, 10.1007/s13412-011-0051-y · doi:10.1007/s13412-011-0051-y
  36. Krimsky, 2007, Risk communication in the internet age: the rise of disorganized skepticism, Environ. Hazards, 7, 157, 10.1016/j.envhaz.2007.05.006 · DOI
  37. Lee, 2005, Public attitudes toward emerging technologies examining the interactive effects of cognitions and affect on public attitudes toward nanotechnology, Sci. Commun., 27, 240, 10.1177/1075547005281474 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Leiserowitz, 2006, Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values, Clim. Change., 77, 45, 10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Leiserowitz, 2005, American risk perceptions: is climate change dangerous?, Risk Anal., 25, 1433, 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00690.x · DOI · Paper page
  40. Lorenzoni, 2006, Cross‐National Comparisons of Image Associations with “Global Warming” and “Climate Change” among Laypeople in the United States of America and Great Britain1, J. Risk Res., 9, 265, 10.1080/13669870600613658 · DOI · Paper page
  41. McCombs, 1972, The agenda-setting function of mass media, Public Opin. Q., 36, 176, 10.1086/267990 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Mnyusiwalla, 2003, “Mind the gap”: science and ethics in nanotechnology, Nanotechnology, 14, R9, 10.1088/0957-4484/14/3/201 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Niederdeppe, 2008, Beyond knowledge gaps: examining socioeconomic differences in response to cancer news, Hum. Commun. Res., 34, 423, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00327.x · DOI
  44. Osborn, 2011, Methane contamination of drinking water accompanying gas-well drilling and hydraulic fracturing, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 10.1073/pnas.1100682108 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Perry, 2012, Addressing the societal costs of unconventional oil and gas exploration and production: a framework for evaluating short-term, future, and cumulative risks and uncertainties of hydrofracking, Environ. Pract., 14, 352, 10.1017/S1466046612000336 · doi:10.1017/s1466046612000336
  46. Peters, 1996, The role of affect and worldviews as orienting dispositions in the perception and acceptance of nuclear power1, J. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 26, 1427, 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb00079.x · DOI · Paper page
  47. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press, 2012. As Gas Prices Pinch, Support for Oil and Gas Production Grows [WWW Document]. Pew Res. Cent. People Press. URL 〈http://www.people-press.org/2012/03/19/as-gas-prices-pinch-support-for-oil-and-gas-production-grows/〉.
  48. Pidgeon, 2012, From nuclear to renewable: energy system transformation and public attitudes, Bull. At. Sci., 68, 41, 10.1177/0096340212451592 · DOI
  49. Rippl, 2002, Cultural theory and risk perception: a proposal for a better measurement, J. Risk Res., 5, 147, 10.1080/13669870110042598 · DOI · Paper page
  50. Rothman, 1987, Elite ideology and risk perception in nuclear energy policy, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev., 81, 383, 10.2307/1961958 · doi:10.2307/1961958
  51. Satterfield, 2004, Discrimination, vulnerability, and justice in the face of risk, Risk Anal., 24, 115, 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00416.x · DOI · Paper page
  52. Scherer, 1999, Promoting informed decision-making: the role of message structure, Risk: Health Saf. Environ., 10, 209
  53. Scheufele, 2005, The public and nanotechnology: How citizens make sense of emerging technologies, J. Nanopart. Res., 7, 659, 10.1007/s11051-005-7526-2 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Siegrist, 2007, Laypeople's and experts' perception of nanotechnology hazards, Risk Anal., 27, 59, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00859.x · DOI · Paper page
  55. Stedman, 2012, Marcellus shale gas development and new boomtown research: views of new york and pennsylvania residents, Environ. Pract., 14, 382, 10.1017/S1466046612000403 · doi:10.1017/s1466046612000403
  56. Swofford, 2010, Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making, Energy Policy, 38, 2508, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.12.046 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Theodori, 2009, Paradoxical perceptions of problems associated with unconventional natural gas development, South. Rural Sociol., 24, 97
  58. Visschers, 2013, How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: results of a longitudinal study before and after the fukushima disaster, Risk Anal., 33, 333, 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01861.x · DOI · Paper page
  59. Walser, 2007, Making mature shale gas plays commercial: process vs. natural parameters, Conference paper presented at 2007 Society of Petroleum Engineers Eastern Regional Meeting held in Lexington, KY, 17-19 October 2007 (SPE 110127). Soc. Pet. Eng
  60. Wildavsky, 1990, Theories of risk perception: who fears what and why?, Daedalus, 119, 41
  61. Williams, 2011, Media evolution and public understanding of climate science, Polit. Life Sci., 30, 20, 10.2990/30_2_20 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 499

Metadata

Authors
Boudet, H., Clarke, C., Bugden, D., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A.
Venue
Energy Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-02
Volume
65
Pages
57-67
ISSN
0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.017
OpenAlex
W1977760162
Cited by
499
References
4
FWCI
126.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: “Fracking” controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.017
The paper
Boudet, H., Clarke, C., Bugden, D., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2014). “Fracking” controversy and communication: Using national survey data to understand public perceptions of hydraulic fracturing. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.017

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.