Why did better place fail?: range anxiety, interpretive flexibility, and electric vehicle promotion in Denmark and Israel
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The low Danish concern about public charging infrastructure might be explained by leftover charging infrastructure from previous EV companies and relative smaller country.
“which might be explained in line with leftover charging infrastructure from previous EV companies (Noel and Sovacool, 2016), and relative smaller country.”
From Understanding the socio-technical nexus of Nordic electric vehicle (EV) barriers: A qualitative discussion of range, price, charging and knowledge (2020) · cites this paper as Noel and Sovacool, 2016
Incentives to address battery limitations may not be cost effective.
“incentives to address battery limitations may not be cost effective either”
From Understanding the socio-technical nexus of Nordic electric vehicle (EV) barriers: A qualitative discussion of range, price, charging and knowledge (2020) · cites this paper as Noel and Sovacool, 2016
Cites
Yilmaz, M., & Krein, P. T. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2012.2212917 · Cited by 3,118 · see citing works
Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from The Netherlands, Denmark and Germany
Pucher, J., & Buehler, R. (2008) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441640701806612 · Cited by 1,591 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Contestation, contingency, and justice in the nordic low-carbon energy transition
Sovacool, B. K. (2017) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.045 · Cited by 198 · see citing works
Self-citationNoel, L., Zarazua de Rubens, G., Kester, J., & Sovacool, B. K. (2020) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111292 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Self-citationSovacool, B. K., Noel, L., Kester, J., & Zarazua de Rubens, G. (2018) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.110 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Noel, L., & Sovacool, B. K.
- Affiliations
- Aarhus University (DK)
- University of Sussex (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Noel, Lance
- Venue
- Energy Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-07
- Volume
- 94
- Pages
- 377-386
- ISSN
- 0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2342814905
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- sro.sussex.ac.uk
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
- Locations
- Energy Policy (publishedVersion)
- Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Scopus (Elsevier) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Research Councils United Kingdom (EP/K011790/1)
- Danish Council for Independent Research (4182–00033B)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Keywords
- electric vehicles, range anxiety, interpretive flexibility, technology failure, electric vehicle charging infrastructure, battery cost, Denmark, Israel, energy planning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
