Cited by 38Climate change impacts on agricultureClimate Change Communication and PerceptionMental Health Treatment and Access

Drought impact on peri-urban farmers’ mental health in semi-arid Ghana: The moderating role of personal social capital

Open access
Abunyewah, Matthew, Okyere, Seth Asare, Opoku Mensah, Seth, Erdiaw-Kwasie, Michael, Gajendran, Thayaparan, Byrne, Mitchell K.·2024·Environmental Development

Abstract

Drought represents a major climate hazard in semi-arid regions. Existing literature has extensively documented drought's economic and environmental impacts across Africa with little attention to the psychological impact of drought. Our study examined the impact of drought on farmers' mental health in the Talensi district, Ghana. In addition, we investigated the moderating effects of personal social capital on the relationships between drought impact and three mental health outcomes-depression, anxiety, and stress. Based on a survey of 507 farmers, drought impact has a positive statistically significant relationship with depression (β = 0.51, p < 0.001), anxiety (β = 0.24, p < 0.05), and stress (β = 0.36, p < 0.001), implying that extended drought and increased severity adversely affect farmers' mental health. Personal social capital was found to be a moderator between drought impacts and mental health outcomes, which suggests that personal social capital is an essential resource to deal with mental health challenges associated with drought. Policy-wise, we submit that integrating psychological support services in climate adaptation initiatives, weaving social capital with other forms of capital (e.g., human, physical, economic, and cultural), and implementing sustainable livelihood diversification programs could mitigate the underlying issues that exacerbate mental health vulnerabilities associated with drought.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100960

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abunyewah, M., Okyere, S. A., Opoku Mensah, S., Erdiaw-Kwasie, M., Gajendran, T., & Byrne, M. K.
Affiliations
  • Charles Darwin University (AU)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Abunyewah, Matthew
Venue
Environmental Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
49
Pages
100960
ISSN
2211-4645 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389974923
Cited by
38
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 7
FWCI
9.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Development (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Charles Darwin University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
drought, mental health, farmers, peri-urban agriculture, social capital, depression, anxiety, stress, climate change adaptation, psychological support, livelihood diversification, semi-arid region

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review