Cited by 13Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental ImpactsEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsUrban Stormwater Management Solutions

Assessing City-Wide Pharmaceutical Emissions to Wastewater via Modelling and Passive Sampling

Open access
Zillien, Caterina, Groenveld, Thijs, Schut, Odin, Beeltje, Henry, Blanco-Ania, Daniel, Posthuma, Leo, Roex, Erwin, Ragas, Ad·2024·Environment International

Abstract

With increasing numbers of chemicals used in modern society, assessing human and environmental exposure to them is becoming increasingly difficult. Recent advances in wastewater-based epidemiology enable valuable insights into public exposure to data-poor compounds. However, measuring all >26,000 chemicals registered under REACH is not just technically unfeasible but would also be incredibly expensive. In this paper, we argue that estimating emissions of chemicals based on usage data could offer a more comprehensive, systematic and efficient approach than repeated monitoring. Emissions of 29 active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) to wastewater were estimated for a medium-sized city in the Netherlands. Usage data was collected both on national and local scale and included prescription data, usage in health-care institutions and over-the-counter sales. Different routes of administration were considered as well as the excretion and subsequent in-sewer back-transformation of conjugates into respective parent compounds. Results suggest model-based emission estimation on a city-level is feasible and in good agreement with wastewater measurements obtained via passive sampling. Results highlight the need to include excretion fractions in the conceptual framework of emission estimation but suggest that the choice of an appropriate excretion fraction has a substantial impact on the resulting model performance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108524

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The observed relative contribution of trimethoprim appears consistent with the excretion fractions reported in recent environmental studies.

    “the relative contribution of trimethoprim that we found appears consistent with the excretion fractions reported in recent environmental studies [2,36].”

    From Pharmacometabolomics Study of Sulfamethoxazole and Trimethoprim in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Real-World Metabolism and Urinary Excretion (2025) · cites this paper as [2]

    Section 2.4 says the study used literature-based excretion fractions to estimate pharmaceutical emissions, and Section 3.1 reports that trimethoprim’s estimated emissions agreed well with wastewater measurements. The copy does not give a trimethoprim-specific excretion fraction or compare it with the citing authors’ observed relative contribution, so that comparison is not directly supported. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. European Commission, 2022. Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2022/1307 of 22 July 2022 establishing a watch list of substances for Union-wide monitoring in the field of water policy pursuant to Directive 2008/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (notified under). Official Journal.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zillien, C., Groenveld, T., Schut, O., Beeltje, H., Blanco-Ania, D., Posthuma, L., Roex, E., & Ragas, A.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Open University of the Netherlands (NL)
  • Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (NL)
  • National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL)
Corresponding author
Zillien, Caterina
Venue
Environment International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
185
Pages
108524
ISSN
0160-4120 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392094141
Cited by
13
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4
FWCI
1.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environment International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TNO Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Rivm Repository (Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
  • Rivm (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Dutch Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
Keywords
wastewater, active pharmaceutical ingredients, emission estimation, wastewater-based epidemiology, passive sampling, usage data, route of administration, human exposure
MeSH terms
Wastewater-Based Epidemiological Monitoring, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Environmental Exposure, Environmental Monitoring, Humans, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Wastewater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review