The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Political power and renewable energy futures: A critical review
Open accessAbstract
Inspired by the energy democracy movement, this conceptual review critically explores relationships between concentrated or distributed renewable energy and political power. Advocates assert that because the renewable energy transition is fundamentally a political struggle, efforts to shift from fossil fuels and decarbonize societies will not prove effective without confronting and destabilizing dominant systems of energy power. The objectives of this paper include: 1) theorizing and exploring the relationships between renewable energy and political power, 2) critically assessing tensions associated with an energy democracy agenda, and 3) drawing out the implications for democratizing renewable energy development in practice. Distributed energy-politics posits that distributed energy sources and technologies enable and organize distributed political power and vice versa. Efforts are underway to find ways to re-organize distributed energy flows into aggregated and concentrated stocks of energy and other forms of political power. More democratic renewable energy futures may benefit from strengthening democratic practices and outcomes, extending democratization of energy systems across all components, stages and end uses, and sharpening positions relative to dominant pressures of capitalism and market ideology, the ideology of unlimited growth, and the modernist/industrialist agenda. Renewable energy systems offer a possibility but not a certainty for more democratic energy futures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Arnstein, S. R. (1969) · Journal of the American Institute of Planners · doi:10.1080/01944366908977225 · Cited by 17,064
Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems
Ostrom, E. (2010) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.100.3.641 · Cited by 4,529
Cited by
Sovacool, B. K. (2021) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2021.101916 · Cited by 614
Energy democracy: Goals and policy instruments for sociotechnical transitions
Burke, M. J., & Stephens, J. C. (2017) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.024 · Cited by 499
Self-citationUzar, U. (2020) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.172 · Cited by 371
Su, C.-W., Umar, M., & Khan, Z. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142220 · Cited by 292
Wolsink, M. (2024) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2023.103392 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Burke, M. J., & Stephens, J. C.
- Venue
- Energy Research & Social Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 35
- Pages
- 78-93
- ISSN
- 2214-6296 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2768565203
- Cited by
- 821
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 43.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Political power and renewable energy futures: A critical review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018
- The paper
- Burke, M. J., & Stephens, J. C. (2018). Political power and renewable energy futures: A critical review. Energy Research & Social Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.