The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Political economy of renewable energy: Does institutional quality make a difference in renewable energy consumption?
Abstract
Abstract The increasingly severe environmental crisis has become one of the most important issues of international debate at present. The acceleration of environmental problems places considerable pressure on individuals, governments, and policymakers. Greenhouse gas emissions caused by fossil-based energy sources have made clean energy sources, such as renewable energy, a strategic choice. Although renewable energy is a key factor in mitigating environmental problems, analysis of its determinants has certain limitations. Despite studies that focus on macroeconomic and environmental determinants of renewable energy, political and institutional factors are neglected. Therefore, to fill the existing gap, the present study analyzes the connection between renewable energy and institutional quality in 38 countries during the period 1990–2015. Economic growth and CO2 emissions are included in the model as control variables. The findings of this study lead to the conclusion that the institutional quality positively affects renewable energy consumption in the long run. Furthermore, CO2 emission is a positive and important determinant of renewable energy consumption. However, economic growth negatively affects renewable energy. In this context, institutional quality is a key strategic choice in promoting the use of renewable energy and solving environmental problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Specification Tests in Econometrics
Hausman, J. A. (1978) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1913827 · Cited by 18,820
Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels
Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(03)00092-7 · Cited by 15,435
Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties
Levin, A., Lin, C.-F., & James Chu, C.-S. (2002) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/s0304-4076(01)00098-7 · Cited by 12,849
A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross‐section dependence
Pesaran, M. H. (2007) · Journal of Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1002/jae.951 · Cited by 12,787
The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics
Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2297111 · Cited by 8,982
The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.5.1369 · Cited by 8,517
Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors
Pedroni, P. (1999) · Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.14 · Cited by 6,726
Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1999.10474156 · Cited by 6,683
Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data*
Westerlund, J. (2007) · Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x · Cited by 6,113
The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation: Reply
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J. A. (2012) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.102.6.3077 · Cited by 6,047
Cited by
Energy poverty, health and education outcomes: Evidence from the developing world
Banerjee, R., Mishra, V., & Maruta, A. A. (2021) · Energy Economics · doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105447 · Cited by 365
Su, C.-W., Umar, M., & Khan, Z. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142220 · Cited by 292
Islam, M. M., Irfan, M., Shahbaz, M., & Vo, X. V. (2022) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.020 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Uzar, U.
- Venue
- Renewable Energy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 155
- Pages
- 591-603
- ISSN
- 0960-1481 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3014353134
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 54
- FWCI
- 38.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Political economy of renewable energy: Does institutional quality make a difference in renewable energy consumption? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.172
- The paper
- Uzar, U. (2020). Political economy of renewable energy: Does institutional quality make a difference in renewable energy consumption? Renewable Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.03.172
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.