Cited by 55Sexual function and dysfunction studiesSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyUrological Disorders and Treatments

Interventions to treat erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation: an overview of systematic reviews

Open access
Ciocanel, Oana, Power, Kevin, Eriksen, Ann·2019·Sexual Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Sexual dysfunction in men is common, and optimal treatment is complex. Although several systematic reviews concerning treatment approaches exist, a comprehensive overview without limitations concerning the population, interventions, or outcomes is lacking. AIM: To conduct a "review of reviews" to compare the effectiveness of pharmacologic, non-pharmacologic, and combined interventions. METHODS: 9 electronic databases, relevant journals, and reference lists up to July 2018 were searched. For each intervention, only the most recent and comprehensive meta-analysis or systematic review was included. The methodologic quality of the reviews was appraised using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews-2 tool. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Sexual functioning (via intravaginal ejaculatory latency time and international index of erectile function), sexual satisfaction, and adverse effects. RESULTS: 30 systematic reviews were included. For premature ejaculation, several treatments, including oral pharmacotherapy (selective serotonin inhibitors, phosphodiesterase type 5 [PDE5] inhibitors, tricyclic antidepressants, and opioid analgesics), topical anesthetics, and combined drug and behavioral therapies demonstrated significant improvements of 1-5 minutes in the intravaginal ejaculatory latency time. Pharmacologic interventions (PDE5 inhibitors, penile injection, and testosterone), shockwave therapy, lifestyle modifications, and combined therapies (PDE5 inhibitors and psychological intervention) were effective in treating erectile dysfunction. Most pharmacologic therapies were associated with adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: There is suggestive evidence that pharmacologic interventions or combined therapies are more effective than non-pharmacologic interventions for treating sexual dysfunction in men; however, a range of treatment options should be presented to individual patients so they may consider the risks and benefits of treatments differently. Evidence related to behavioral and psychological interventions is insufficient compared with that related to drug trials, highlighting the necessity for larger and better randomized controlled trials. Ciocanel O, Power K, Eriksen A. Interventions to Treat Erectile Dysfunction and Premature Ejaculation: An Overview of Systematic Reviews. Sex Med 2019;7:251-269.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.esxm.2019.06.001

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients may prefer medical treatment over psychological treatment because they consider medication or sexual aids a quick fix and less invasive than facing emotional and relational issues.

    “The patients themselves may also prefer a medical treatment over psychological treatment because they consider the use of medication or other sexual aids as a quick fix and less invasive than being exposed to emotional and relational issues.105”

    From A Psychosocial Approach to Erectile Dysfunction: Position Statements from the European Society of Sexual Medicine (ESSM) (2021) · cites this paper as [105]

    The Discussion (page not provided) says some patients may prefer a pharmacologic approach while others favor a behavioral one. It does not say patients view medication or sexual aids as a quick fix, or as less invasive than addressing emotional and relational issues. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 89 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ciocanel, O., Power, K., & Eriksen, A.
Affiliations
NHS Tayside (GB)
Corresponding author
Ciocanel, Oana
Venue
Sexual Medicine
Published
2019-07-09
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
251-269
ISSN
2050-1161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2956359583
Cited by
55
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
erectile dysfunction, premature ejaculation, male sexual dysfunction, pharmacotherapy, non-pharmacological treatment, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, topical anesthetics, intravaginal ejaculatory latency time, International Index of Erectile Function, sexual satisfaction, adverse effects, penile injection, testosterone, shock wave therapy, behavior therapy, psychological intervention, treatment effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review