Cited by 84Sexual function and dysfunction studiesUrological Disorders and TreatmentsSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Combination of psychological intervention and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction: A narrative review and meta-analysis

Open access
Schmidt, Hannah M., Munder, Thomas, Gerger, Heike, Frühauf, Sarah, Barth, Jürgen·2014·The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Erectile dysfunction (ED) is an increasing health problem that demands effective treatment. There is evidence that phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) and psychological intervention (PI) are effective treatment options; however, little is known about their comparative efficacy and the efficacy of combined treatments. AIM: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the comparative efficacy of PI, PDE5-Is, and their combination in the treatment of ED. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was ED symptoms, and secondary outcome was sexual satisfaction of the patient. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in order to identify relevant articles published between 1998 and 2012. We included randomized controlled trials and controlled trials comparing PI with PDE5-I treatment or one of them against a combination of both. RESULTS: Eight studies with a total number of 562 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The results of the included studies are inconclusive, though they show a trend towards a larger effect of combined treatment compared with PI or PDE5-I treatment alone. The meta-analysis found that, overall, combined treatment was more efficacious for ED symptoms than PDE5-I treatment or PI alone. Combined treatment was more efficacious than PDE5-I use alone on sexual satisfaction. No differences were found between PDE5-Is and PI as stand-alone treatments. None of the moderators (treatment duration, methodological quality, or researcher allegiance) altered the effects. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of PI and PDE5-Is is a promising strategy for a favorable outcome in ED and can be considered as a first-choice option for ED patients. Stronger RCTs are required to confirm this initial finding.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jsm.12520

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychological treatment may help promote treatment adherence, integrate medical aids into the sexual relationship, and resolve psychological correlates such as anxiety, negative thoughts, distress, self-confidence, intimacy, and communication problems.

    “Psychological treatment may help to promote treatment adherence, integrate the treatment (ie, medical aids) into the sexual relationship and resolve psychological correlates such anxiety, negative thoughts, distress, self-confidence, intimacy, and communication problems between partners.59,109”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schmidt, H. M., Munder, T., Gerger, H., Frühauf, S., & Barth, J.
Affiliations
University of Bern (CH)
Corresponding author
Barth, Jürgen
Venue
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2014-06-01
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
1376-1391
ISSN
  • 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-6109
OpenAlex
W1914654329
Cited by
84
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (submittedVersion)
  • DSpace (Open University in the Netherlands) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
erectile dysfunction, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors, psychological intervention, combination therapy, sexual satisfaction, treatment efficacy, drug efficacy comparison
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Humans, Erectile Dysfunction, Male, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Sex Counseling, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Young Adult, Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review