Cited by 73Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryPsychological Testing and Assessment

Assessing apathy: The use of the Apathy Evaluation Scale in first episode psychosis

Faerden, Ann, Nesvåg, Ragnar, Barrett, Elizabeth Ann, Agartz, Ingrid, Finset, Arnstein, Friis, Svein, Rossberg, Jan Ivar, Melle, Ingrid·2008·European Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Recently there has been a renewed interest in defining the boundaries and subdomains of the negative syndrome in schizophrenia and new scales have been asked for. Apathy is one of the symptoms in focus. The Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) with its clinical version (AES-C) is one of the most used scales in an interdisciplinary context, but it has never previously been used in a population with first episode psychosis. The main aims of this study were to examine the psychometric properties of the AES-C and its relationship to the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Methods: A total of 104 patients with first episode psychosis from the ongoing Thematic Organized Psychosis Research (TOP) study were included. Results: A factor analysis of the AES-C identified three subscales: Apathy, Insight and Social Contacts. Only the Apathy subscale showed satisfactory psychometric properties and showed acceptable convergent and discriminate properties by correlating strongly with the apathy-related items of the PANSS. Conclusions: This study shows that the AES-C measures more than one dimension. The main factor, the Apathy subscale, can however be used to assess apathy in first episode psychosis patients in the ongoing work of refining the subdomains of the negative syndrome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2007.09.002

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Faerden, A., Nesvåg, R., Barrett, E. A., Agartz, I., Finset, A., Friis, S., Rossberg, J. I., & Melle, I.
Affiliations
  • Diakonhjemmet Hospital (NO)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
Venue
European Psychiatry
Published
2008-01
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
33-39
ISSN
  • 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1778-3585
OpenAlex
W2072383853
Cited by
73
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
apathy, Apathy Evaluation Scale, first-episode psychosis, psychometric properties, factor structure, insight, social contact, negative symptoms, PANSS, schizophrenia
MeSH terms
Affective Symptoms, Awareness, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Discriminant Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review