Cited by 200Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyDigital Media and Philosophy

Internet Use, Facebook Intrusion, and Depression: Results of a Cross-Sectional Study

Błachnio, A., Przepiórka, A., Pantic, I.·2015·European Psychiatry

Abstract

Facebook has become a very popular social networking platform today, particularly among adolescents and young adults, profoundly changing the way they communicate and interact. However, some reports have indicated that excessive Facebook use might have detrimental effects on mental health and be associated with certain psychological problems. Because previous findings on the relationship between Facebook addiction and depression were not unambiguous, further investigation was required. The main objective of our study was to examine the potential associations between Internet use, depression, and Facebook intrusion. A total of 672 Facebook users took part in the cross-sectional study. The Facebook Intrusion Questionnaire and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale were used. For collecting the data, the snowball sampling procedure was used. We showed that depression can be a predictor of Facebook intrusion. Our results provides additional evidence that daily Internet use time in minutes, gender, and age are also predictors of Facebook intrusion: that Facebook intrusion can be predicted by being male, young age, and an extensive number of minutes spent online. On the basis of this study, it is possible to conclude that there are certain demographic – variables, such as age, gender, or time spent online – that may help in outlining the profile of a user who may be in danger of becoming addicted to Facebook. This piece of knowledge may serve for prevention purposes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.04.002

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Błachnio, A., Przepiórka, A., & Pantic, I.
Affiliations
  • John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin (PL)
  • University of Belgrade (RS)
Corresponding author
Błachnio, A.
Venue
European Psychiatry
Published
2015-05-08
Volume
30
Issue
6
Pages
681-684
ISSN
  • 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1778-3585
OpenAlex
W1782232633
Cited by
199
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 5
FWCI
66.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
Keywords
depression, internet use, Facebook addiction, social networking sites, adolescents, young adults, online time, gender differences, age differences, mental health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Time Factors, Behavior, Addictive, Internet, Social Networking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review