Cited by 163Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyDigital Media and Philosophy

Beyond “Facebook Addiction”: the role of cognitive-related factors and psychiatric distress in social networking site addiction

Open access
Pontes, Halley M., Taylor, Megan, Stavropoulos, Vasileios·2018·Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Abstract

The use of social networking sites (SNSs) is rapidly increasing as billions of individuals use SNS platforms regularly to communicate with other users, follow the news, and play browser games. Given the widespread use of SNS platforms, investigating the potential predictors of addictive SNS use beyond Facebook use has become paramount given that most studies so far focused on "Facebook addiction." In this study, a total of 511 English-speaking SNS users (58.1% young adults aged 20-35 years; 64.6% female) were recruited online and asked to complete a battery of standardized psychometric tools assessing participants' sociodemographic characteristics, SNS preferences and patterns of use, SNS addiction, preference for online social interaction, maladaptive cognitions, fear of missing out (FoMo), dysfunctional emotion regulation, and general psychiatric distress. Overall, about 4.9% (n = 25) of all participants could be classed as having a high SNS addiction risk profile. Moreover, the results further indicated that FoMo (β = 0.38), maladaptive cognitions (β = 0.25), and psychiatric distress (β = 0.12) significantly predicted SNS addiction (i.e., p < 0.0001) and accounted for about 61% of the total variance in SNS addiction, with FoMo providing the strongest predictive contribution over and above the effects of sociodemographic variables and patterns of SNS use. The implications of the present findings were discussed in light of extant literature on behavioral addictions and Facebook addiction and further considerations were provided regarding the potential clinical implications for cognitive-based psychological treatment approaches to SNS addiction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2017.0609

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some scholars advocated for strict monothetic and polythetic classifications with a cutoff of 4.

    “Some scholars consider endorsement of the mid-point to be too liberal, and have thus advocated for the use of strict monothetic and polythetic classifications with a cutoff of 4 (e.g., Gul, Yurumez Solmaz, Gul, & Oner, 2018;Pontes, Taylor, & Stavropoulos, 2018).”

    From Prevalence of social media addiction across 32 nations: Meta-analysis with subgroup analysis of classification schemes and cultural values (2021) · cites this paper as Pontes, Taylor, & Stavropoulos, 2018

    The Measures section (page unavailable) says the study used a previously suggested strict monothetic cutoff of 4 or above on all six items. It does not describe a polythetic classification or argue that endorsing the midpoint is too liberal, so the full attribution is not supported. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Social media use has been negatively associated with face-to-face social interactions.

    “Social media use has been negatively associated with face-to-face social interactions, which can impact the development of social skills and decision-making abilities as well (Pontes et al., 2018).”

    From The impact of digital technology, social media, and artificial intelligence on cognitive functions: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Pontes et al., 2018

    The Introduction (page unavailable) defines preference for online social interaction as favoring online relationships over face-to-face activities, and the Discussion reports higher levels of that preference among participants at high risk of social networking site addiction. The paper does not report a negative association between social media use and the amount of face-to-face interaction, nor does it address decision-making abilities. Its discussion of interpersonal difficulties concerns Facebook addiction in adolescents, not social media use generally. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This negative association can impact the development of social skills and decision-making abilities.

    “which can impact the development of social skills and decision-making abilities as well (Pontes et al., 2018).”

    From The impact of digital technology, social media, and artificial intelligence on cognitive functions: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Pontes et al., 2018

    The Discussion (page unavailable) reports that Facebook addiction has been linked to poorer ability to provide emotional support and manage interpersonal conflicts in adolescents, which is relevant to social skills. It does not establish an impact on the development of those skills or address decision-making abilities. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Wells A. (2000) Emotional disorders and metacognition: innovative cognitive therapy. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pontes, H. M., Taylor, M., & Stavropoulos, V.
Affiliations
  • Nottingham Trent University (GB)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Corresponding author
Pontes, Halley M.
Venue
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Published
2018-04
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
240-247
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
OpenAlex
W2795114958
Cited by
163
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5
FWCI
38.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • Nottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) (acceptedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Digital Media and Philosophy
Keywords
Facebook addiction, fear of missing out, maladaptive cognitions, psychiatric distress, emotional dysregulation, behavioral addiction, online social interaction, predictors of addiction, young adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Fear, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Stress, Psychological, Behavior, Addictive, Young Adult, Social Networking, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review