Cited by 123Gut microbiota and healthSchizophrenia research and treatmentTryptophan and brain disorders

Gut microbiome and magnetic resonance spectroscopy study of subjects at ultra-high risk for psychosis may support the membrane hypothesis

Open access
He, Ying, Kosciolek, Tomasz, Tang, Jinsong, Zhou, Yao, Li, Zongchang, Ma, Xiaoqian, Zhu, Qiyun, Yuan, Ning +6 more·2018·European Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: The microbiota-gut-brain axis and membrane dysfunction in the brain has attracted increasing attention in the field of psychiatric research. However, the possible interactive role of gut microbiota and brain function in the prodromal stage of schizophrenia has not been studied yet. Methods: To explore this, we collected fecal samples and performed Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy (MRS) scans in 81 high risk (HR) subjects, 19 ultra-high risk (UHR) subjects and 69 health controls (HC). Then we analyzed the differences in gut microbiota and choline concentrations in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC). Results: Presences of the orders Clostridiales,Lactobacillales and Bacteroidales were observed at increase levels in fecal samples of UHR subjects compared to the other two groups. The composition changes of gut microbiota indicate the increased production of Short Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs), which could activate microglia and then disrupt membrane metabolism. Furthermore, this was confirmed by an increase of choline levels, a brain imaging marker of membrane dysfunction, which is also significantly elevated in UHR subjects compared to the HR and HC groups. Conclusion: Both gut microbiome and imaging studies of UHR subjects suggest the membrane dysfunction in the brain and hence might support the membrane hypothesis of schizophrenia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.05.011

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
He, Y., Kosciolek, T., Tang, J., Zhou, Y., Li, Z., Ma, X., Zhu, Q., Yuan, N., Yuan, L., Li, C., Jin, K., Knight, R., Tsuang, M. T., & Chen, X.
Affiliations
  • Central South University (CN)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Hunan Children's Hospital (CN)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Chen, Xiaogang
Venue
European Psychiatry
Published
2018-06-02
Volume
53
Pages
37-45
ISSN
  • 0924-9338 (ISSN-L)
  • 1778-3585
OpenAlex
W2805843535
Cited by
123
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 5
FWCI
4.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81471361, 81271484)
  • China Scholarship Council (201606370199)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
gut microbiota, clinical high risk for psychosis, prodromal schizophrenia, microbiota-gut-brain axis, choline, anterior cingulate cortex, short-chain fatty acids, microglial activation, membrane dysfunction, Clostridiales, Lactobacillales, Bacteroidales, fecal microbiota
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Adolescent, Adult, Choline, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Male, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Young Adult, Neuroimaging, Prodromal Symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review