Cited by 69Schizophrenia research and treatmentEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Cognitive and neural strategies during control of the anterior cingulate cortex by fMRI neurofeedback in patients with schizophrenia

Open access
Cordes, Julia S., Mathiak, Krystyna A., Dyck, Miriam, Alawi, Eliza M., Gaber, Tilman J., Zepf, Florian D., Klasen, Martin, Zvyagintsev, Mikhail +2 more·2015·Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Cognitive functioning is impaired in patients with schizophrenia, leading to significant disabilities in everyday functioning. Its improvement is an important treatment target. Neurofeedback (NF) seems a promising method to address the neural dysfunctions underlying those cognitive impairments. The anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), a central hub for cognitive processing, is one of the brain regions known to be dysfunctional in schizophrenia. Here we conducted NF training based on real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in patients with schizophrenia to enable them to control their ACC activity. Training was performed over 3 days in a group of 11 patients with schizophrenia and 11 healthy controls. Social feedback was provided in accordance with the evoked activity in the selected region of interest (ROI). Neural and cognitive strategies were examined off-line. Both groups learned to control the activity of their ACC but used different neural strategies: patients activated the dorsal and healthy controls the rostral subdivision. Patients mainly used imagination of music to elicit activity and the control group imagination of sports. In a stepwise regression analysis, the difference in neural control did not result from the differences in cognitive strategies but from diagnosis alone. Based on social reinforcers, patients with schizophrenia can learn to regulate localized brain activity. However, cognitive strategies and neural network location differ from healthy controls. These data emphasize that for therapeutic interventions in patients with schizophrenia compensatory strategies may emerge. Specific cognitive skills or specific dysfunctional networks should be addressed to train impaired skills. Social NF based on fMRI may be one method to accomplish precise learning targets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00169

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rt-fMRI NF is a promising non-invasive approach to support voluntary modification of BOLD activation in individuals with psychiatric disorders characterized by aberrant neural activation patterns.

    “Real-time fMRI neurofeedback (rt-fMRI NF) is a promising non-invasive approach to support voluntary modification of blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) activation in individuals with psychiatric disorders characterized by aberrant neural activation patterns (Cordes et al., 2015, Dyck et al., 2016, Young et al., 2017, Zaehringer et al., 2019, Zweerings et al., 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 74 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cordes, J. S., Mathiak, K. A., Dyck, M., Alawi, E. M., Gaber, T. J., Zepf, F. D., Klasen, M., Zvyagintsev, M., Gur, R. C., & Mathiak, K.
Affiliations
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Mathiak, Klaus
Venue
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2015-06-25
Volume
9
Pages
169-169
ISSN
1662-5153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1492481035
Cited by
69
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
FWCI
7.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (IRTG1328, APIC: 01EE1405B, MA2631/6-1, 2631/6-1, MA 2631/6)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01EE1405B, APIC: 01EE1405B)
  • RWTH Aachen University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
schizophrenia, fMRI neurofeedback, anterior cingulate cortex, cognitive control, cognitive strategies, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, rostral anterior cingulate cortex, musical imagery, social feedback, compensatory strategies, cognitive impairment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review