The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A critical analysis of evaluation practice: the Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Course evaluation using questionnaires and assessment of participant satisfaction are level 1 criteria of Kirkpatrick’s evaluation model of training programs (subjective evaluation).”
From Neurosurgery resident training using blended learning concepts: Course development and participant evaluation (2022) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“it remains to be evaluated whether these skills will be transferred actively into clinical practice where they can have an impact on patient outcome (level 3).18”
From Neurosurgery resident training using blended learning concepts: Course development and participant evaluation (2022) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Analysis of objective, automated measures of the e-learning account for level 2.”
From Neurosurgery resident training using blended learning concepts: Course development and participant evaluation (2022) · cites this paper as [18]
Citations
Cites
Evaluating Training Programs : The Four Levels
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (2009) · Cited by 4,720
Principles of Biomedical Ethics.
(1984) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-100-1-168_1 · Cited by 4,559
Utilization-Focused Evaluation
(2018) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781506326139.n729 · Cited by 2,315
Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.311 · Cited by 1,831 · cited 1×
“Kraiger, Ford and Salas (1993) have forwarded a multidimensional model of learning outcomes from training and have described a process training evaluators could use to developing learning evaluation measures (Kraiger & Jung, 1997).”
BackgroundThe science of training: a decade of progress
Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.471 · Cited by 1,703
Techniques for Evaluating Training Programs
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1975) · Training and development journal · Cited by 1,234
Training and Development in Work Organizations
Tannenbaum, S. I., & YUKL, G. A. (1992) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.002151 · Cited by 1,023
Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (1973) · Cited by 970
The flawed four‐level evaluation model
Holton, E. F. (1996) · Human Resource Development Quarterly · doi:10.1002/hrdq.3920070103 · Cited by 965
Principles of Biomedical Ethics
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childless, J. F. (1991) · International Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/00004850-199100620-00013 · Cited by 964
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Ford, 1995, The application of cognitive constructs and principles to the instructional systems design model of training: Implications for needs assessment, design, and transfer, International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 10, 1
- Grider, 1988, Evaluating valuations, Training and Development Journal, 42, 11
- Schwandt, T. A., (1998). How we think about evaluation practice. Paper presented at the American Evaluation Association Conference, Chicago, IL.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 623
Ali, S., Chalder, T., & Madan, I. (2014) · Safety and Health at Work · doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2014.07.002 · Cited by 11
“Also Kirkpatrick’s [12] model is beneficial in that it provides a simplified way of evaluating training [13], which can be easily replicated.”
BackgroundDelivering training strategies: the balanced scorecard at work
Baraldi, S., & Cifalinò, A. (2015) · International Journal of Training and Development · doi:10.1111/ijtd.12055 · Cited by 11
Nurse Executives’ Perceptions of the Executive Training for Research Application (EXTRA) Program
Lavoie‐Tremblay, M., Anderson, M. I., Bonneville‐Roussy, A., Drevniok, U., & Lavigne, G. L. (2011) · Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1741-6787.2011.00218.x · Cited by 11
“The Kirkpatrick four-level model (Reaction, Learning, Behavior, and Results) is the most well known and used model for assessing learning in organizations (Kirkpatrick 1994, 1998; Bates, 2004).”
MethodNeubauer, F. B., Wagner, F. L., Lörwald, A. C., & Huwendiek, S. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05590-0 · Cited by 13
“This question is posed variously under well-known labels: Authors aware of said stagnancy either call for “formative evaluation” [52], “process evaluation” [14], or “realist evalua-tion” [42] in order to understand why interventions work as intended or not.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialStockheim, J., Andriof, S., Andric, M., Al-Madhi, S., Acciuffi, S., Franz, M., Lorenz, E. P. M., Peglow, S., Benedix, F., Perrakis, A., et al. (2024) · Journal of Robotic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11701-024-02056-9 · Cited by 10
“However, it is not feasible to deduce recommendations for improving the training program specifically based on this evaluation [16].”
BackgroundRahman, M. Z., Kumarasamy, M. M., & Bhuiyan, A. B. (2019) · International Journal of Business and Management Future · doi:10.46281/ijbmf.v3i2.367 · Cited by 10
“The items described has been found to be helpful to measure the turning effectiveness of training programs(Bates, 2004; Kirkpatrick & Kirkpatrick, 2015).”
BackgroundTrainees’ aversions of employee training programs
Andoh, R. P. K., Annan-Prah, E. C., Owusu, E. A., & Agyei, P. M. (2022) · European journal of training and development · doi:10.1108/ejtd-02-2022-0022 · Cited by 10
Mellor, P. D., Gregoric, C., Atkinson, L. M., & Greenhill, J. (2017) · Journal of Nursing Regulation · doi:10.1016/s2155-8256(17)30095-9 · Cited by 10
“Also, concern exists regarding the subjective nature of levels 1 and 2 as well as claims that the model does not include contextual influences when assessing the transfer of behavior or skills to the workplace, such as the learning culture of the organization (Bates, 2004; Galloway, 2005).”
BackgroundRashidian, N., Willaert, W., Giglio, M. C., Scuderi, V., Tozzi, F., Vanlander, A., D'Herde, K. G. M. A., Alseidi, A. A., & TROISI, R. I. (2019) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-019-05103-x · Cited by 10
Rose, J. S., Lalgudi, S., Joshua, R. A., Paul, J., Susanne, M. A., Phillips, A. C., Jeyaraj, C., Abraham, G., Joshua, R. A., Vinay, S., et al. (2020) · Indian Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.4103/ijo.ijo_2054_20 · Cited by 10
“The 1‐week outcome measures only evaluate the primary levels of Kirkpatrick’s model of learning.[16] A longer follow up would be required in assessing clinical competence in work place based practice over a period of time.”
BackgroundWanjiku, J., Mairura, F., & Place, F. (2010) · The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension · doi:10.1080/1389224x.2010.515064 · Cited by 13
“Despite the methodological challenges of assessing training impact (Sharples et al, 2003 ; Gardner, 2003 ; Bates, 2004 ), several other factors including, poor monitoring and evaluation structures, lack of resources, weak policy support, and poor documentation and information systems have contributed to ineffective or…”
BackgroundBuilding Evaluation Capability in the Public Health Workforce
Dickinson, P., & Adams, J. (2012) · Evaluation Journal of Australasia · doi:10.1177/1035719x1201200204 · Cited by 10
“While there has been some criticism of Kirkpatrick’s model for its oversimplification, including the assumptions of causality between levels and that information is increasingly important as the levels of outcomes are ascended (Bates 2004), it is still considered a useful framework.”
Asthma education for school staff
Kew, K. M., Carr, R., Donovan, T., & Gordon, M. A. (2016) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd012255 · Cited by 10
Gillanders, S. L., McHugh, A., Lacy, P. D., & Thornton, M. (2023) · Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) · doi:10.1007/s11845-023-03309-6 · Cited by 9
“Level three behaviour outcomes address how the knowledge is implemented, and finally, level four results provide a measure of the impact that training has had on broader organizational goals, timing or financial objectives [10].”
BackgroundEffectiveness of Virtual Laboratory Teacher Training Workshops: A Kirkpatrick Model Analysis
Achuthan, K., Kolil, V. K., & Jyothy, S. N. (2023) · International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) · doi:10.3991/ijet.v18i15.40037 · Cited by 9
Pollard, J., & Tombs, M. (2022) · Advances in Medical Education and Practice · doi:10.2147/amep.s344301 · Cited by 9
“A follow-up longitudinal study evaluating attitudes of newly qualified FY1ʹs who participated in SWE as undergraduates may help ascertain other aspects and possible benefits of the educational intervention.(32,33)”
BackgroundBhat, Z. H. (2023) · International Journal of Training and Development · doi:10.1111/ijtd.12311 · Cited by 9
Azmat, F., Ferdous, A. S., Wali, F. I., Muttakin, M. B., & Haque, M. Z. (2024) · Journal of Service Theory and Practice · doi:10.1108/jstp-03-2023-0103 · Cited by 9
Rethinking training evaluation: omnidirectional evaluation, range of audience and intentional change
Langmann, S., & Thomas, S. R. (2017) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2017.1303782 · Cited by 9
“Limitations include current evaluation models being too simplistic (Bates, 2004), too complex or starting from the wrong place of inquiry (Alliger, Tannenbaum, Bennett, Traver, & Shotland,1997), having an incomplete understanding of evaluating stakeholders and differences in their expectations of…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialInvolving teachers in reducing children’s media risks
Stiller, A., Schwendemann, H., Bleckmann, P., Bitzer, E., & Mößle, T. (2017) · Health Education · doi:10.1108/he-11-2016-0061 · Cited by 9
Main, S., Lestari, T., Triasih, R., Chan, G., Davidson, L., Majumdar, S. S., Santoso, D., Phung, S., Laukkala, J., Graham, S. M., et al. (2019) · Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease · doi:10.3390/tropicalmed4030107 · Cited by 9
“They should attempt to measure not just participant reactions, but also learning, behaviour change, and, although difficult, impact on TB programs or health systems [15].”
BackgroundFirm size, ownership, training duration and training evaluation practices
Asadullah, M. A., Peretti, J. M., Arain, G. A., & Bourgain, M. (2015) · European journal of training and development · doi:10.1108/ejtd-10-2014-0072 · Cited by 9
“Various researchers criticized TKMand different frameworks of evaluation emerged from this model (Bates, 2004). As training is an investment requiring training professionals to determine its value in dollar terms, therefore, Phillips (1997), like various authors, suggested to include a financial perspective ROI as a f…”
BackgroundHaq, Z. U., Qureshi, F., Hafeez, A., Zafar, S., Mohamud, B. K., & Southal, D. P. (2009) · PubMed · Cited by 9
Evaluation Models for Evaluating Educational Programs
Brewer, E. W. (2011) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-61520-745-9.ch007 · Cited by 9
Nguyen, B. T., Nguyen, V. A. T., Blizzard, C. L., Palmer, A. J., Nguyen, H. T., Quyet, T. C., Tran, V., Skinner, M., Perndt, H., & Nelson, M. R. (2024) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/47127 · Cited by 12
“The assessments were conducted using an Objective Structured Clinical Examination format [20,24] with 4 stations, each station lasting up to 10 minutes, with one observer who used a standardized checklist to rate the performance of the team.”
MethodContorting identities: figuring literacy and identity in adolescent worlds
Quinlan, A., & Curtin, A. J. (2017) · Irish Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03323315.2017.1362352 · Cited by 8
“According to Bates (2004), a significant principle of ethics to consider is that of beneficence which dictates that the good obtained must be balanced against the possible harm.”
BackgroundYee, S., Richert, R., Viguié, G., Couraud, S., Dehurtevent, M., Fages, M., Corne, P., & Ducret, M. (2019) · Clinical and Experimental Dental Research · doi:10.1002/cre2.184 · Cited by 8
“Performance requires the use of scales and instruments to examine a range of variables during training (Bates, 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialMillimouno, T. M., Delvaux, T., Kolié, J. M., Kourouma, K., Bastelaere, S. V., Tsunami, C. K., Béavogui, A. H., Garcia, M., Damme, W. V., & Délamou, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2022.911089 · Cited by 8
“Similarly, it leads to some limitations - it fails to grasp complexity of the context and related factors - it shows a certain rigidity - and the hierarchical order and importance of the different levels can be questioned (41, 42).”
BackgroundService Learning in the Nursing Bachelor Thesis: A Mixed-Methods Study
Roca, J., Gros, S., Vélez, O. C., Ortega, J. T., Tort‐Nasarre, G., Postic, T., & Martínez-Alarcón, L. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph191912387 · Cited by 8
“It also simplifies the assessment of training programs and services [30,31].”
BackgroundSheehan, S., Hanna, J. R., Drury, A., McCance, T., Semple, C. J., & O’Neill, C. (2023) · Seminars in Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151474 · Cited by 8
Yueh, H., Chen, T., Chiu, L.-A., & Lin, W.-C. M. (2013) · Educational Technology & Society · Cited by 8
The patient suicide attempt – An ethical dilemma case study
Jie, L. (2015) · International Journal of Nursing Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ijnss.2015.01.013 · Cited by 8
Prabhath, S., Kulkarni, U., Vani Lakshmi, R., Patra, B., Eshwari, K., Prabhu, D. A., & Nayak, K. R. (2025) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-025-06742-6 · Cited by 7
“The session’s effectiveness was evaluated based on the first two levels of the Kirkpatrick evaluation model [15, 16].”
Differing associations between organizational training types and operational resilience
Ataburo, H., Essuman, D., Mensah, H. K., Aditchere, J., & Nkrumah, P. (2025) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/md-05-2024-1194 · Cited by 8
Sustainance of Community Engagement – Is it a Feasible Feat?
Ramachandra, A., Mansor, N. N. A., Anvari, R., & Rahman, A. A. (2014) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.661 · Cited by 7
Kobayashi, S., Allen, K. D., Bennell, K. L., Bowden, J. L., Briggs, A. M., Burgess, A. W., Hinman, R. S., Holden, M. A., Østerås, N., Risberg, M. A., et al. (2022) · Clinics in Geriatric Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.cger.2021.11.008 · Cited by 7
Surgical education interventions in liver surgery: a systematic review
Rashidian, N., Vierstraete, M., Alseidi, A. A., TROISI, R. I., & Willaert, W. (2020) · Updates in Surgery · doi:10.1007/s13304-020-00766-x · Cited by 7
Impact of internet supported dental education: Initial outcomes in a study sample
Sarsar, F. (2016) · Journal of Human Sciences · doi:10.14687/jhs.v13i3.4209 · Cited by 7
“Discussion Students’ affective responses and instructors’ comments are generally utilized as the first step in evaluating a novel system prior to its incorporation into education (Bates, 2004; Willcockson & Phelps, 2010), as was performed in the present study.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential“L'évocation de la liberté améliore-t-elle l'efficacité d'une formation ?”
Gillet, I., Gilibert, D., & Girandola, F. (2013) · Les cahiers internationaux de psychologie sociale · doi:10.3917/cips.098.0147 · Cited by 7
Phillipson, J., Barclay, S. F., Menson, E. N., & Lyons, O. (2024) · BMJ Paediatrics Open · doi:10.1136/bmjpo-2024-003047 · Cited by 6
Benfatah, M., Elazizi, I., Belhaj, H., & Lamiri, A. (2025) · Journal of Nursing Regulation · doi:10.1016/j.jnr.2025.08.004 · Cited by 8
Medical student education for injury prevention: closing the gap
Zosel, A. E., Kohlbeck, S. A., Davis, C. S., Meurer, L. N., & Hargarten, S. W. (2020) · Injury Prevention · doi:10.1136/injuryprev-2020-043759 · Cited by 6
Qiu, Z., Su, W., Chen, X., Xiang, X., Chen, Q., & Kong, J. (2023) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings13092255 · Cited by 6
Measuring the effectiveness of L&D: Time to move on from Kirkpatrick and Phillips?
Kirwan, C. (2024) · International Journal of Training and Development · doi:10.1111/ijtd.12342 · Cited by 6
Drop-in sessions as an effective format for teaching information literacy:
Funnell, P. (2015) · Journal of Information Literacy · doi:10.11645/9.2.1982 · Cited by 6
Wong, H. J., Su, B., Attaar, M., Kuchta, K. M., Linn, J. G., Denham, W., Haggerty, S. P., & Ujiki, M. B. (2020) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2020.08.023 · Cited by 6
M3: The military medicine module: A focussed competency-based program
Lall, M., Datta, K., Iyengar, M. A., Shakya, A., & Kanitkar, M. (2021) · Medical Journal Armed Forces India · doi:10.1016/j.mjafi.2021.01.004 · Cited by 6
“specifically done to avoid bias and it also ensured the conduct of independent feedback analysis and genuine modification based on the feedback and not affected by the perception of the involved faculty and administration.(33) We have described a focussed competency-based modular approach to integrate military medical…”
MethodE-learning for WASH systems strengthening: lessons from a capacity-building platform
Leal, A., Saleh, A., & Verhoeven, J. (2022) · H2Open Journal · doi:10.2166/h2oj.2022.066 · Cited by 6
“Although the Kirkpatrick model has been criticised (Bates 2004), it has been used for decades and remains one of the most widely used tools for the evaluation of workplace training due to its systematic approach (Paula et al.”
MethodHarris, C. K., Chen, Y., Jensen, K. C., Hornick, J. L., Kilfoyle, C., Lamps, L. W., & Heher, Y. (2022) · Academic Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.acpath.2022.100048 · Cited by 6
ten Cate, D., Dikken, J., Ettema, R. G. A., Schoonhoven, L., & Schuurmans, M. J. (2022) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105623 · Cited by 6
Nausheen, S., Jalil, S., Anwer, T., & Akhter, A. Z. (2010) · PubMed · Cited by 6
Integrating Learning Outcome Typologies for HRD: Review and Current Status
Lim, D. H., Yoon, S. W., & Park, S. (2013) · New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development · doi:10.1002/nha.20015 · Cited by 6
“…little assumption of causal linkages between the levels, and little attention to the importance of positive correlations between the levels (Bates, 2004), this model, for almost five decades since its inception, has been one of the most frequently used evaluation models among HRD…”
Leigh, J., & Darvill, A. (2019) · International Journal of Practice-based Learning in Health and Social Care · doi:10.18552/ijpblhsc.v7i1.513 · Cited by 6
“(Bates 2004).”
Harvey, E. J., Pinder, J. A., Haslam, R. A., Dainty, A., & Gibb, A. (2019) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102955 · Cited by 6
Cooper, S. J., Cant, R., & Chung, C. E. (2020) · Clinical Simulation in Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ecns.2020.05.004 · Cited by 6
Evaluation of Educational Workshops for Family Medicine Residents Using the Kirkpatrick Framework
Almeneessier, A. S., Alyousefi, N. A., Alwatban, L., Alodhayani, A. A., Alzahrani, A. M., Alwalan, S. I., AlSaad, S. Z., & Alonezan, A. (2021) · Advances in Medical Education and Practice · doi:10.2147/amep.s283379 · Cited by 6
“Level four of the Kirkpatrick model may not provide information on improving the structure and process of training programs.(11) The majority of program evaluations that used the Kirkpatrick model focused on level 1 (72%) and level 2 (31%) and to a lesser extent level 3 (20%) and level 4 (12%).”
MethodWard, J., & Bailey, D. (2015) · Practice · doi:10.1080/09503153.2015.1087492 · Cited by 6
“However, Kirkpatrick fails to connect these levels with an evaluation of the context in which the training takes place and it has also been criticised as being too simplistic (Bates 2004; Laughrin 2005).”
BackgroundChen, C., Chang, H., Hsu, W., & Sheen, G. (2016) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1180663 · Cited by 7
Srinivas, P. N., Marchal, B., Macq, J., Kegels, G., & Criel, B. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2451132 · Cited by 6
Palliative care simulation for internal medicine trainees: development and pilot study
Dewhurst, F., Howorth, K., Billett, H. C., Brown, J., Charles, M., Fleming, E., Gouldthorpe, C., Huggin, A., Kavanagh, E., Kiltie, R., et al. (2021) · BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care · doi:10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003272 · Cited by 5
The Effects Of An Intervention In Student Teachers’ Classroom Management Learning Processes
Adams, T., Köster, B., & Brok, P. J. D. (2024) · Pedagogische Studiën · doi:10.59302/ps.v101i1.18784 · Cited by 5
“These studies also indicate that there is no valuable information found on Kirkpatricks’ fourth level (Reio et al., 2017; Bates, 2004).”
BackgroundMeasuring the impact of faculty development programmes on business schools’ performance in Pakistan
Maqsood, N., Prendeville, P., & Bhatti, S. H. (2024) · Journal of Education for Business · doi:10.1080/08832323.2024.2372498 · Cited by 5
“Kirkpatrick’s model can provide a heuristic to guide training and developmental evaluations (Bates, 2004).”
A reflection on a leadership training programme of the Ministry of Interior, Thailand
Siengthai, S. (2015) · Human Resource Development International · doi:10.1080/13678868.2015.1071992 · Cited by 5
“By far, the most popular approach used to evaluate training in organizations today is Kirkpatrick’s (1975) framework of four progressive ‘levels’ of criteria: 1) reaction, 2) learning, 3) behaviour, and 4) results (Bates 2004; Antle, Barbee, and Van Zyl 2008).”
MethodImplementation evaluation in paralympic sports achievement development
Fabiano, K., Hidayatullah, M. F., & Purnama, S. K. (2021) · International journal of social sciences · doi:10.31295/ijss.v4n1.410 · Cited by 5
“Evaluation activities are carried out periodically to determine the level of success in implementing the training program (Bates, 2004; Faith, 1992).”
BackgroundLahat, L., & Sabah, Y. (2021) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-03-2020-0064 · Cited by 5
Williams, K. M., Martín‐Raugh, M. P., & Lentini, J. E. (2022) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/ets2.12346 · Cited by 7
Khurshid, Z., Brún, A. D., & McAuliffe, É. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047639 · Cited by 5
Bennett, N., Dudo, A. D., & Besley, J. C. (2022) · International Journal of Science Education Part B · doi:10.1080/21548455.2022.2155495 · Cited by 8
“Instead, program directors can pull from, adapt, and apply procedures from the extensive, multi-disciplinary literature focused on evaluation practices (Barel-Ben David & Baram-Tsabari, 2000; Bates, 2004; Kirkpatrick, 1967; Praslova, 2010; Rodgers et al., 2020).”
BackgroundEvaluation of the Effectiveness of E-Training: A Case Study on In-Service Teachers' Training
Zheng, L., Huang, R., & Yu, J. (2013) · IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT) · doi:10.1109/icalt.2013.71 · Cited by 5
The Incompatibility of End-User Learning Styles and the Current ERP Training Approach
Chayakonvikom, M., Fuangvut, P., & Prinyapol, N. (2015) · International Journal of Information and Education Technology · doi:10.7763/ijiet.2016.v6.736 · Cited by 8
Perceptions of robotics emulation of human ethics in educational settings: a content analysis
Fedock, B., Paladino, A. E., Bailey, L. W., & Moses, B. (2018) · Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning · doi:10.1108/jrit-02-2018-0004 · Cited by 5
“Though the framework was created before the emulation of human ethics was used by robots in educational settings, educators tend to create ethical policies which are based on Kitchener’s framework (Bates, 2004).”
MethodLoureiro, N. A. R. S., & Alves, M. G. (2019) · Security and Defence Quarterly · doi:10.35467/sdq/106084 · Cited by 5
“Holton and Bates (Holton et al. 2000, 2007, Bates 2004, Holton 2005, Velada et al. 2009, Bates et al. 2012, Hutchins et al. 2013, Alvelos et al. 2015, Banerjee et al. 2016), two of the most prolific researchers in the field of training transfer, consider that training evaluation policies,…”
BackgroundCreating Effective eLearning to Help Drive Change
Mulcahy, R. S. (2020) · ACS Chemical Health & Safety · doi:10.1021/acs.chas.0c00091 · Cited by 5
Wong, H. J., Su, B., Attaar, M., Kuchta, K. M., Linn, J. G., Haggerty, S. P., Denham, W., & Ujiki, M. B. (2021) · Surgical Innovation · doi:10.1177/15533506211038088 · Cited by 5
Bergamo, P. A. D. S., Izart, C., Streng, E. S., Rosenkranz, J., & Ghorbani, Y. (2022) · Minerals Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107825 · Cited by 5
The Role of Evaluation Methods in Health-Related E-learning: A Rapid Review
Stemp, J. D., Ghosh, D., Khan, U. R., & Boyd, J. (2022) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v26i4.3115 · Cited by 5
“…student responses about the quality of training; Level 2 (learning) quantifies learning using assessments and exams; Level 3 (behavior) measures the extent to which learning can be applied to the workplace; and Level 4 (results) measures how training has impacted organizational goals (Bates, 2004).”
BackgroundFraticelli, L., Freyssenge, J., Promé-Combel, E., Agnellet, E., Dargaud, Y. G., & Chamouard, V. (2023) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/43091 · Cited by 5
“The KM presents limitations [23] because the 4-level implementation can be time-consuming and requires an expensive investment to collect data and analyze learning outcomes.”
BackgroundKeshmiri, F. (2023) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04682-7 · Cited by 11
“The evaluation of the ESP process and learner-related outcomes of the ESP was conducted based on the Kirk-patrick Model [34].”
MethodXu, W., Jiang, Q., Qin, X., Fang, G., & Hu, Z. (2016) · BioScience Trends · doi:10.5582/bst.2016.01083 · Cited by 5
Wu, S., Legido‐Quigley, H., Spencer, J., Coker, R. J., & Khan, M. S. (2018) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-018-0292-2 · Cited by 7
Zamani-Miandashti, N., Mohammadi, I. M., Hoseini, S. M., & Zamani, G. H. (2008) · Human Resource Development International · doi:10.1080/13678860802261694 · Cited by 5
“…and effectiveness, and easily define HRD evaluation as meeting programme goals; some other HRD professionals, like Kirkpatrick (1967, 1987, 1994), have suggested an HRD evaluation framework that is mainly an HRD effectiveness framework, because it only considers programme outcomes (Bates 2004).”
BackgroundBroucker, B. (2010) · Journal of Public Affairs Education · doi:10.1080/15236803.2010.12001595 · Cited by 5
“Factors that influence transfer before, during, and after a program (Holton, 1996; Bates, 2005) exist on the organizational level (Broad & Newstrom, 1992; Awoniyi et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialStrategies for research in healthcare simulation
Nestel, D., & Kelly, M. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119061656.ch6 · Cited by 5
Campbell, S. J., & Mather, C. A. (2018) · Journal of research in nursing · doi:10.1177/1744987118786083 · Cited by 4
“Moreau (2017), Frye and Hemmer (2012), Bates (2004) and Holton (1996) have addressed Kirkpatrick’s original model (1996) and its failure to address specific indicators, such as motivation and baseline knowledge of the health professionals being trained.”
BackgroundInfluentialMa, C.-Y., Wang, K.-C., Liu, D.-Y., & Lai, T.-C. (2023) · Education + Training · doi:10.1108/et-09-2022-0370 · Cited by 4
Golestani, M., Sadeghi‐Bazargani, H., Harzand-Jadidi, S., & Soori, H. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-05122-w · Cited by 4
“…before, during, and after participating in the course), (3) behavior level (the type and degree of changes in the behavior of participants as a result of participating in training courses), and (4) results level (the level of achievement of goals directly related to the organization) [9, 10].”
BackgroundEvaluating a research methodology workshop among postgraduate students using Kirkpatrick’s model
Debata, I., Nayak, S., Ahmed, S., Behera, B. K., & Padhee, S. (2024) · Journal of Education and Health Promotion · doi:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1026_23 · Cited by 4
“[10] This model consists of four evaluation levels which are interdependent, shown in Figure 1.”
MethodIslam, M. Z., Jilani, M. M. A. K., & Karim, M. R. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0305916 · Cited by 4
Zamani-Miandashti, N., & Malekmohammadi, I. (2012) · Cited by 4
Singh, G. (2013) · European Journal of Open Distance and E-Learning · Cited by 4
HRD research trends on the application of theories in Korean HRD journals (2007~2016)
Yoon, S. K., Cha, M., 송영수, & Jeong, B. Y. (2017) · The Korean Journal of Human Resource Development Quarterly · doi:10.18211/kjhrdq.2017.19.3.001 · Cited by 4
Creation and Pilot-testing of Virtual Patients for Learning Oncologic Emergency Management
Fawaz, Z. S., Posel, N. H., Royal-Preyra, B., Khriguian, J., & Alfieri, J. (2019) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.6206 · Cited by 4
“This model can also be integrated in the Kirkpatrick Four-level model of evaluation which includes the reaction of the learner, learning the concepts, behavioral application of the knowledge, and results in terms of performance [3].”
MethodIntegration of Instructional Models and Learning Styles for Open and Distance Learning Environment
Zulkifli, Z. A., Sharip, A. A., Zain, S. M. M., Rahid, N. N. A., Saidi, R. M., Rashid, N. A. M., & Geigiana, A. (2022) · World Journal of English Language · doi:10.5430/wjel.v12n2p226 · Cited by 4
Tait, S. D., Oshima, S. M., Leraas, H. J., Gunn, A. H., Sarver, M. M., Gunes, F., & Greenup, R. A. (2023) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04038-1 · Cited by 4
“Primary outcome measures were based upon Kirkpat-rick’s four-level training evaluation model, [29] and included: acceptability of the educational intervention; student knowledge regarding treatment-related financial hardship; student attitudes regarding cost-conscious practices; and student…”
MethodArmstrong, L., Moir, C., & Taylor, P. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077784 · Cited by 4
“31 Ignoring context is considered to be the antithesis of healthcare improvement principles and is instead a prerequisite to understanding why success ensues in one instance and not in another.”
BackgroundDufour, I., Arsenault‐Lapierre, G., Guillette, M., Dame, N., Poitras, M.-È., Lussier, M., Fortier, A., Brunet, J., Martin, J., Laverdure, M., et al. (2023) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-023-10248-6 · Cited by 5
“The questionnaires will be constructed using the Kirkpatrick model [35], used to evaluate the results of training and learning programs, and the validated Continuing professional development (CPD)- Reaction tool [36], adapted for the three specific trainings.”
MethodThe Business of Corporate Learning: Insights from Practice
Ben‐Hur, S. (2013) · Cited by 4
Giacomantonio, C., & Litmanovitz, Y. (2017) · Policing & Society · doi:10.1080/10439463.2017.1341511 · Cited by 4
“However, as other studies of police training have suggested (e.g. Litmanovitz 2016), positive post-course assessments are not strong predictors of successful outcomes – in this case, actual behavioural or attitudinal changes (see also Webster-Stratton 1990, Bates 2004).”
BackgroundEvaluating Effectiveness of a Teacher Training MOOC: Industry Perspective
Soorya, M., & Banerjee, G. (2019) · IEEE International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E) · doi:10.1109/t4e.2019.00-42 · Cited by 4
“Data reported in this paper was collected through a postcourse survey adapted from [9].”
BackgroundMethodBotek, M. (2013) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.261 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Bates, R.
- Affiliations
- Louisiana State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bates, Reid
- Venue
- Evaluation and Program Planning
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 341-347
- ISSN
- 0149-7189 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097592370
- Cited by
- 623
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 53 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 4.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Evaluation and Program Planning (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Keywords
- Kirkpatrick model, training evaluation, beneficence, moral obligation, formative assessment, summative assessment, training effectiveness, human resource development, evaluation limitations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review