Cited by 29Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Mindfulness for Healthcare Providers: The Role of Non-Reactivity in Reducing Stress

Open access
Benzo, Roberto P., Anderson, Paige M., Bronars, Carrie, Clark, Mathew·2018·EXPLORE

Abstract

Context There is strong evidence in the literature that the cultivation of mindfulness through programs such as Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) has a profound impact on perceived stress for healthcare providers. The mechanism of the latter association is still being studied. However, it has been hypothesized that in particular, the cultivation of non-reactivity as a mindfulness skill may be particularly associated with the salutary effect of MBSR to reduce stress in health care providers even if adjusted for the benefit on quality of life gained after MBSR. The latter may represent important mechanistic information to build customized mindfulness interventions for health care providers.Objective Determine whether the change in non-reactivity to inner experience after MBSR is associated with the adjusted changes in perceived stress after MBSR.Design a Cross-sectional study.Setting A large, Midwestern teaching hospital.Participants 100 health care providers.Intervention 8-week standard MBSR course.Main outcome measures Perceived Stress Scale-10, Linear Analog Scale Assessment to measure Quality of life, and the mindfulness domain non-reactivity to inner experience was assessed by the non-reactivity subscale of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. All measures were administered at baseline and completion of the intervention.Results The change from baseline to completion of MBSR was significant for all variables, with moderate-to-robust effect sizes. There was a significant negative correlation between non-reactivity and perceived stress both at baseline (p < 0.0001) and when comparing changes in scores from baseline to post-intervention (p < 0.0001). Change in non-reactivity to inner experience was robustly associated with the change in perceived stress (p < 0.0001) after MBSR (97% in 5000 bootstrapped models).Conclusion Non-reactivity to inner experience is a key aspect of MBSR that is independently associated with a change in perceived stress in health care providers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.explore.2018.03.008

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have found that non-reactivity plays a more specific role in reducing stress and improving cognitive flexibility after mindfulness-based interventions.

    “Previous studies have found that non-reactivity plays a more specific role in reducing stress and improving cognitive flexibility after mindfulness-based interventions [28, 60, 61].”

    From Effectiveness of an age-modified mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) in improving mental health in older people with depressive symptoms: a non-randomised controlled trial. (2025) · cites this paper as [60]

    The Results and Discussion report that non-reactivity improved after MBSR and that its change was strongly associated with reduced perceived stress in healthcare providers. The paper does not report improved cognitive flexibility, and its stress finding is an association rather than proof that non-reactivity caused the reduction. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benzo, R. P., Anderson, P. M., Bronars, C., & Clark, M.
Affiliations
Mayo Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Benzo, Roberto P.
Venue
EXPLORE
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
453-456
ISSN
1550-8307 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2887038699
Cited by
29
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • EXPLORE (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (1 R43 AT009665-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
mindfulness, non-reactivity, perceived stress, healthcare workers, mindfulness-based stress reduction, quality of life, Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire, stress reduction
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Health Personnel, Humans, Perception, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Midwestern United States, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review