Cited by 109Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStress and Burnout Research

A Brief Mindfulness-Based Intervention for Primary Care Physicians: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Schroeder, David A., Stephens, Elizabeth, Colgan, Dharmakaya, Hunsinger, Matthew, Rubin, Dan, Christopher, Michael S.·2018·American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine

Abstract

Primary care physicians experience high rates of burnout, which results in diminished quality of life, poorer quality of care, and workforce attrition. In this randomized controlled trial, our primary aim was to examine the impact of a brief mindfulness-based intervention (MBI) on burnout, stress, mindfulness, compassion, and resilience among physicians. A total of 33 physicians completed the baseline assessment and were randomized to the Mindful Medicine Curriculum (MMC; n = 17) or waitlist control group (n = 16). Participants completed self-report measures at baseline, post-MBI, and 3-month follow-up. We also analyzed satisfaction with doctor communication (DCC) and overall doctor rating (ODR) data from patients of the physicians in our sample. Participants in the MMC group reported significant improvements in stress (P < .001), mindfulness (P = .05), emotional exhaustion (P = .004), and depersonalization (P = .01) whereas in the control group, there were no improvements on these outcomes. Although the MMC had no impact on patient-reported DCC or ODR, among the entire sample at baseline, DCC and ODR were significantly correlated with several physician outcomes, including resilience and personal achievement. Overall, these findings suggest that a brief MBI can have a positive impact on physician well-being and potentially enhance patient care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1559827616629121

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schroeder, D. A., Stephens, E., Colgan, D., Hunsinger, M., Rubin, D., & Christopher, M. S.
Affiliations
  • Pacific University Oregon (US)
  • Providence Heart Clinic, Portland, OR (DAS)
Corresponding author
Christopher, Michael S.
Venue
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
Published
2016-02-04
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
83-91
ISSN
  • 1559-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-8284
OpenAlex
W2267914313
Cited by
109
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3
FWCI
8.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Providence Health System Clinical Transformation Council (Mindful Medicine: Improving Physician Mindfulness)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, physician burnout, primary care physicians, occupational stress, compassion, resilience, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, physician well-being, patient satisfaction, physician-patient communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review