The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Posttraumatic epilepsy after controlled cortical impact injury in mice
Open accessAbstract
Many patients develop temporal lobe epilepsy after trauma, but basic mechanisms underlying the development of chronic seizures after head injury remain poorly understood. Using the controlled cortical impact injury model we examined whether mice developed spontaneous seizures after mild (0.5mm injury depth) or severe (1.0mm injury depth) brain injury and how subsequent posttraumatic mossy fiber sprouting was associated with excitability in the dentate gyrus 42–71 days after injury. After several weeks, spontaneous behavioral seizures were observed in 20% of mice with mild and 36% of mice with severe injury. Mossy fiber sprouting was typically present in septal slices of the dentate gyrus ipsilateral to the injury, but not in control mice. In slices with mossy fiber sprouting, perforant path stimulation revealed a significant reduction (P<0.01) in paired-pulse ratios in dentate granule cells at 20ms and 40ms interpulse intervals, but not at 80ms or 160ms intervals. These slices were also characterized by spontaneous and hilar-evoked epileptiform activity in the dentate gyrus in the presence of Mg2+-free ACSF containing 100μM picrotoxin. In contrast, paired-pulse and hilar-evoked responses in slices from injured animals that did not display mossy fiber sprouting were not different from controls. These data suggest the development of spontaneous posttraumatic seizures as well as structural and functional network changes associated with temporal lobe epilepsy in the mouse dentate gyrus by 71d after CCI injury. Identifying experimental injury models that exhibit similar pathology to injury-induced epilepsy in humans should help to elucidate the mechanisms by which the injured brain becomes epileptic.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A controlled cortical impact model of traumatic brain injury in the rat
Edward Dixon, C., Clifton, G. L., Lighthall, J. W., Yaghmai, A. A., & Hayes, R. L. (1991) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/0165-0270(91)90104-8 · Cited by 1,141
A population-based study of seizures after traumatic brain injuries
Annegers, J. F., Hauser, W. A., Coan, S. P., & Rocca, W. A. (1998) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199801013380104 · Cited by 1,090 · cited 2×
“Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is often accompanied by the delayed development of posttraumatic epilepsy (PTE) (Caveness et al., 1979; Annegers et al., 1998; Englander et al., 2003).”
Hall, E. D., Sullivan, P. G., Gibson, T. R., Pavel, K. M., Thompson, B. M., & Scheff, S. W. (2005) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2005.22.252 · Cited by 319 · cited 5×
“Since our methods of CCI were identical to those used in previous studies (Hall et al., 2005), the assumption is that the initial lesion was similar in dimension and variability to that described previously.”
InfluentialSelf-citationShibley, H., & Smith, B. N. (2002) · Epilepsy Research · doi:10.1016/s0920-1211(02)00012-8 · Cited by 201
Self-citation
Cited by
Blast TBI models, neuropathology, and implications for seizure risk.
Kovacs, S. K., Leonessa, F., & Ling, G. S. F. (2014) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2014.00047 · Cited by 71
Konduru, S. S., Wallace, E. P., Pfammatter, J. A., Rodrigues, P. V., Jones, M. V., & Maganti, R. K. (2021) · Epilepsia Open · doi:10.1002/epi4.12462 · Cited by 33
Fronczak, K. M., Li, Y., Henchir, J., Dixon, C. E., & Carlson, S. W. (2021) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s12035-021-02534-3 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Hunt, R. F., Scheff, S. W., & Smith, B. N.
- Venue
- Experimental Neurology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 215
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 243-252
- ISSN
- 0014-4886 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029038733
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.