Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 206

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Posttraumatic epilepsy after controlled cortical impact injury in mice

Open access
Hunt, Robert F., Scheff, Stephen W., Smith, Bret N.·2009·Experimental Neurology

Abstract

Many patients develop temporal lobe epilepsy after trauma, but basic mechanisms underlying the development of chronic seizures after head injury remain poorly understood. Using the controlled cortical impact injury model we examined whether mice developed spontaneous seizures after mild (0.5mm injury depth) or severe (1.0mm injury depth) brain injury and how subsequent posttraumatic mossy fiber sprouting was associated with excitability in the dentate gyrus 42–71 days after injury. After several weeks, spontaneous behavioral seizures were observed in 20% of mice with mild and 36% of mice with severe injury. Mossy fiber sprouting was typically present in septal slices of the dentate gyrus ipsilateral to the injury, but not in control mice. In slices with mossy fiber sprouting, perforant path stimulation revealed a significant reduction (P<0.01) in paired-pulse ratios in dentate granule cells at 20ms and 40ms interpulse intervals, but not at 80ms or 160ms intervals. These slices were also characterized by spontaneous and hilar-evoked epileptiform activity in the dentate gyrus in the presence of Mg2+-free ACSF containing 100μM picrotoxin. In contrast, paired-pulse and hilar-evoked responses in slices from injured animals that did not display mossy fiber sprouting were not different from controls. These data suggest the development of spontaneous posttraumatic seizures as well as structural and functional network changes associated with temporal lobe epilepsy in the mouse dentate gyrus by 71d after CCI injury. Identifying experimental injury models that exhibit similar pathology to injury-induced epilepsy in humans should help to elucidate the mechanisms by which the injured brain becomes epileptic.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.expneurol.2008.10.005

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 206

Metadata

Authors
Hunt, R. F., Scheff, S. W., & Smith, B. N.
Venue
Experimental Neurology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
215
Issue
2
Pages
243-252
ISSN
0014-4886 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029038733
Cited by
206
References
4
FWCI
6.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.