The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Imprinting disorders and assisted reproductive technology
Open accessAbstract
Objective To review currently available literature on the association between imprinting disorders (Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome [BWS], Angleman syndrome [AS] and retinoblastoma) and assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in humans. Design Publications related to imprinting/epigenetic disorders including BWS, AS and retinoblastoma with ART and articles publishing outcome of ART, including IVF and ICSI, from July 1978 to February 2008 were identified using PubMed, Medline and EMBASE. Result(s) Considerable evidence in animal studies has demonstrated alteration in gene imprinting of embryos cultured in vitro. Publications from Europe, America and Australia have suggested an association between ART and BWS. Importantly, more than 90% of BWS in children born after ART had imprinting defects, compared to 40–50% of BWS in children conceived without ART. Moreover, there have been other reports suggesting an association between AS and ART. The majority of children with AS born after ART had an imprinting defect as the underlying etiology, specifically loss of methylation of the maternal allele. There was a single report suggesting an increased incidence of retinoblastoma in children conceived with ART. Conclusion(s) Because the absolute incidence of imprinting disorders is very small (< 1:12,000 births), routine screening for imprinting disorders in children conceived with ART is not recommended. Additional large cohort studies of children born after ART are needed to determine whether there is a genuine association between ART and imprinting disorders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jaenisch, R., & Bird, A. (2003) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1089 · Cited by 6,325
Okano, M., Bell, D. W., Haber, D. A., & Li, E. (1999) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81656-6 · Cited by 6,143
Epigenetic Reprogramming in Mammalian Development
Reik, W., Dean, W., & Walter, J. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1063443 · Cited by 3,078
Methylation of a CTCF-dependent boundary controls imprinted expression of the Igf2 gene
Bell, A. C., & Felsenfeld, G. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35013100 · Cited by 1,746
Role of paternal and maternal genomes in mouse development
Barton, S. C., Surani, M. A. H., & Norris, M. L. (1984) · Nature · doi:10.1038/311374a0 · Cited by 724
Tumours and hemihypertrophy associated with Wiedemann-Beckwith syndrome
Wiedemann, H. R. (1983) · European Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1007/bf00496807 · Cited by 281
Cited by
The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation
Meseguer, M., Herrero, J., Tejera, A., Hilligsoe, K. M., Ramsing, N. B., & Remohi, J. (2011) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/der256 · Cited by 913
Argyraki, M., Damdimopoulou, P., Chatzimeletiou, K., Grimbizis, G. F., Tarlatzis, B. C., Syrrou, M., & Lambropoulos, A. (2019) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmz025 · Cited by 86
Reproductive outcomes after assisted conception
Talaulikar, V. S., & Arulkumaran, S. (2012) · Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey · doi:10.1097/ogx.0b013e31826a5d4a · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Manipalviratn, S., DeCherney, A., & Segars, J.
- Venue
- Fertility and Sterility
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 305-315
- ISSN
- 0015-0282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084279635
- Cited by
- 389
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 30.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imprinting disorders and assisted reproductive technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.002
- The paper
- Manipalviratn, S., DeCherney, A., & Segars, J. (2009). Imprinting disorders and assisted reproductive technology. Fertility and Sterility. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.01.002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.