Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 941

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antibacterial activity and mechanism of cinnamon essential oil against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus

Open access
Zhang, Yunbin, Liu, Xiaoyu, Wang, Yifei, Jiang, Pingping, Quek, SiewYoung·2016·Food Control

Abstract

Cinnamon essential oil (EO) exhibited effective antibacterial activity against foodborne spoilage and pathogenic bacteria in model systems using Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus. The minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) of cinnamon EO was similar for both bacteria (1.0 mg/ml) while the minimum bactericide concentration (MBC) were 4.0 mg/ml and 2.0 mg/ml for E. coli and Staphylococcus aureus. GC–MS analysis confirmed that cinnamaldehyde was the major constituent in cinnamon EO (92.40%). Much effort was focused on elucidating the mechanism of antibacterial action of cinnamon EO against E. coli and S. aureus by observing the changes of cell microstructure using scanning electron microscope, determination of cell permeability, membrane integrity and membrane potential. After adding cinnamon EO at MIC level, there were obvious changes in the morphology of bacteria cells indicating cell damage. When cinnamon EO were added at MBC levels, the cells were destroyed. Cinnamon EO led to leakage of small electrolytes, causing rapid increase in the electric conductivity of samples at the first few hours. The values for E. coli and S. aureus reached 60% and 79.4% respectively at 7 h. Moreover, the concentration of proteins and nucleic acids in cell suspension also rose with increased cinnamon EO. Bacterial metabolic activity was decreased 3–5 folds as reflected by the results of membrane potential. Overall, S. aureus was more susceptible to cinnamon EO than E. coli.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.05.032

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 941

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Wang, Y., Jiang, P., & Quek, S.
Venue
Food Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-01
Volume
59
Pages
282-289
ISSN
0956-7135 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2190959760
Cited by
941
References
6
FWCI
48.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibacterial activity and mechanism of cinnamon essential oil against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.05.032
The paper
Zhang, Y., Liu, X., Wang, Y., Jiang, P., & Quek, S. (2016). Antibacterial activity and mechanism of cinnamon essential oil against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Food Control. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.05.032

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.