Cited by 115Global Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyEconomics of Agriculture and Food MarketsAgricultural and Food Production Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Linking agricultural policies with obesity and noncommunicable diseases: A new perspective for a globalising world

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.02.011

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 82 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Haley, M.M., 2001. Changing consumer demand for meat: the U.S. example, 1970-2000. In: Regmi, A., (Ed.). Changing Structure of Global Food Consumption and Trade. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture and Trade Report WRS011, Washington, DC, pp. 41–8.
  2. Hawkes, C., Ruel, M., 2011. 2020 Conference Paper 4: Value Chains for Nutrition. IFPRI, Washington, DC. <http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/2020anhconfpaper04.pdf> (accessed 16.08.11).
  3. Lock, 2004, Why should public health be part of an integrated European agriculture and food policy?, Eurohealth, 10, 1
  4. Nazario, S., 1984. Coke Raises Level of Corn Sweetener Allowed in Product. Wall Street Journal (Eastern Edition) February 9, p. 1.
  5. Pollan, M., 2003. The (Agri)cultural Contradictions of Obesity. New York Times 3 AD October 12 2003, pp. 41–47.
  6. Williamson J. A Short History of the Washington Consensus: Paper Commissioned by Fundación CIDOB for a Conference “From the Washington Consensus towards a new Global Governance,” Barcelona, September 24–25, 2004. <http://www.iie.com/publications/papers/williamson0904-2.pdf>.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–115 of 115

Metadata

Authors
Hawkes, C., Friel, S., Lobstein, T., & Lang, T.
Affiliations
  • City, University of London (GB)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • World Obesity Federation (GB)
Corresponding author
Hawkes, Corinna
Venue
Food Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
37
Issue
3
Pages
343-353
ISSN
0306-9192 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105890051
Cited by
115
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
23.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Food Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Food Production Studies
Keywords
agricultural policy, obesity, non-communicable diseases, food choice, market liberalization, globalization, food availability, food affordability, food acceptance, food processing, food supply chain, food industry, ingredient substitution, healthy eating promotion, fruit and vegetable production

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review