The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relating the food involvement scale to demographic variables, food choice and other constructs
Abstract
This paper describes recent research with the Food Involvement Scale (FIS), relating it to other constructs and demographics, and its potential influence on food choices. We administered the FIS and other established scales to a sample of undergraduates (n = 109) from a UK university. The FIS was found to be associated with many other scales, and a multiple regression suggested that higher levels of food involvement are associated with living with two or more friends, cooking for one's self, having regular meals, and being older. We then administered the FIS along with the Block Food Frequency questionnaire to a sample of military personnel (n = 2068) and compared food intake patterns between high and low involvement subjects. The analysis suggests that food involvement, as measured by FIS, appears to mediate differences in food choices and food choice patterns.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“as previous studies have shown a positive relationship between food involvement and healthy eating patterns [62,63].”
From The association of demographic characteristics and food choice motives with the consumption of functional foods in emerging adults (2020) · cites this paper as [63]
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Measuring the involvement construct
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208520 · Cited by 6,013
Central and Peripheral Routes to Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208954 · Cited by 4,610
Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,368
Measuring Consumer Involvement Profiles
Laurent, G., & Kapferer, J. (1985) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378502200104 · Cited by 2,247
Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans
Pliner, P., & Hobden, K. (1992) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/0195-6663(92)90014-w · Cited by 2,137
The role of involvement in attention and comprehension processes
Celsi, R. L., & Olson, J. C. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209158 · Cited by 2,070
The Personal Involvement Inventory: Reduction, Revision, and Application to Advertising
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1994) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.1943.10673459 · Cited by 1,737
The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning Without Involvement
Krugman, H. E. (1965) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/267335 · Cited by 1,570
External Search Effort: An Investigation Across Several Product Categories
Beatty, S. E., & Smith, S. M. (1987) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209095 · Cited by 1,297
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Bell, R., & Marshall, D. W. (2001). The construct of food involvement and its relationship with sensory testing: scale construction and validation. Presented at the 4th Rose Marie Pangborn sensory science symposium, Dijon France, 21–26 July
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chen, M. (2007) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.04.004 · Cited by 894
Kim, Y. G., Suh, B. W., & Eves, A. (2009) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.10.015 · Cited by 338
Van Loo, E. J., Hoefkens, C., & Verbeke, W. (2017) · Food Policy · doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2017.03.001 · Cited by 292
The mindful consumer: Balancing egoistic and altruistic motivations to purchase local food
Birch, D., Memery, J., & De Silva Kanakaratne, M. (2018) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.10.013 · Cited by 272
Eertmans, A., Victoir, A., Vansant, G. A. A. M., & den Bergh, O. V. (2005) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.04.007 · Cited by 250
Metadata
- Authors
- Marshall, D., & Bell, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Combat Capabilities Development Command Soldier Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Marshall, David
- ORCID
- Marshall, David
- Venue
- Food Quality and Preference
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 7-8
- Pages
- 871-879
- ISSN
- 0950-3293 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1986391342
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 0.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Food Quality and Preference (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Food, Nutrition, and Cultural Practices
- Keywords
- food involvement, food choice, dietary intake, demographic factors, living arrangements, cooking habits, meal frequency, age, military personnel, undergraduate students
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
