A roadmap for developing educational actions using food safety culture assessment – A case of an institutional food service
Open accessAbstract
Food safety (FS) culture has been recognised as a phenomenon that can shape food safety behaviour. Specific educational actions can improve food safety behaviour. This study aimed to build a roadmap to guide the development of educational actions based on the assessment of the prevailing FS-culture. The study was conducted in an institutional food service in the Brazilian air force. A previously-developed mixed-methods and data triangulation approach was used to assess the FS-culture based on eight elements (leadership, communication, knowledge, commitment, risk perception, work pressure and normative beliefs, work environment, and management systems, styles, and process). The roadmap was designed based on a combination of the FS-culture element score (1-reactive, 2-active, and 3-proactive) and priority levels (highest, moderate, lowest, and no priority) of proposed topics to be included in educational actions. Such topics were based on specific literature about food safety culture and the behaviour of food handlers. The FS-culture diagnosis in the air force food service demonstrated an "active to proactive" FS-culture; the element "work pressure and normative beliefs" showed the highest score (3 - proactive), whereas "risk perception" and "management systems, styles, and process" indicated the lowest scores (1-2 - reactive to active). Based on the weaknesses and strengths in the prevailing FS-culture, the roadmap revealed that the topics showing the lowest scores, "risk perception" and "management systems, styles, and process," had the highest priority to be included in the educational actions. The designed roadmap may support food services in making decisions about food safety education towards a proactive FS-culture.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Baş, M., Şafak Ersun, A., & Kıvanç, G. (2006) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2004.11.006 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Evaluation of the food safety training for food handlers in restaurant operations
Park, S.-H., Kwak, T.-K., & Chang, H.-J. (2010) · Nutrition Research and Practice · doi:10.4162/nrp.2010.4.1.58 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Food safety culture: the evolution of an emerging risk factor?
Griffith, C. J., Livesey, K. M., & Clayton, D. A. (2010) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/00070701011034439 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
Insfran-Rivarola, A., Tlapa, D., Limon-Romero, J., Baez-Lopez, Y., Miranda-Ackerman, M., Arredondo-Soto, K., & Ontiveros, S. (2020) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods9091169 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Parry-Hanson Kunadu, A., Ofosu, D. B., Aboagye, E., & Tano-Debrah, K. (2016) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.05.011 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Evaluation of a food hygiene training course in Scotland
Ehiri, J. E., Morris, G. P., & McEwen, J. (1997) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/s0956-7135(97)00005-4 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Food safety training and evaluation of handwashing intention among fresh produce farm workers
Soon, J. M., & Baines, R. N. (2012) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.08.012 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Nieto-Montenegro, S., Brown, J. L., & LaBorde, L. F. (2008) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.07.005 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Zanin, L. M., Luning, P. A., & Stedefeldt, E.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Stedefeldt, Elke
- Venue
- Food Research International
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2022-05
- Volume
- 155
- Pages
- 111064
- ISSN
- 0963-9969 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4213424087
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 4.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- Food Research International (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Occupational Health and Safety Research
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Chemical Health and Safety › Chemical Safety and Risk Management
- Keywords
- food safety culture, food safety education, institutional food service, food handlers, food safety behavior, risk perception, leadership, normative beliefs, occupational stress, management systems, Brazilian Air Force
- MeSH terms
- Food, Food Handling, Food Services, Humans, Safety Management, Food Safety
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review