Cited by 25Adversarial Robustness in Machine LearningPrivacy-Preserving Technologies in DataDigital Media Forensic Detection

An adaptive robust defending algorithm against backdoor attacks in federated learning

Wang, Yongkang, Zhai, Di-Hua, He, Yongping, Xia, Yuanqing·2023·Future Generation Computer Systems

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.future.2023.01.026

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Defense during the aggregation phase can use a robust aggregator based on statistical methods that calculates statistical features of model updates, including average and median, and selects one or more participants as reference to detect malicious updates.

    “defenders design a robust aggregator based on statistical methods [194], [208]. By calculating the statistical features of model updates, including average and median, one or more participants are selected as the reference to detect the malicious updates [193], [209].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, Y., Zhai, D.-H., He, Y., & Xia, Y.
Affiliations
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhai, Di-Hua
Venue
Future Generation Computer Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-06
Volume
143
Pages
118-131
ISSN
0167-739X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4319027606
Cited by
25
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Future Generation Computer Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
Keywords
backdoor attacks, federated learning, adaptive clustering, cosine distance, adaptive clipping, data poisoning, model poisoning, non-IID data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review