Cited by 91Interdisciplinary Research and CollaborationResearch, Science, and Academiascientometrics and bibliometrics research

’Exploring the promises of transdisciplinary research: a quantitative study of two climate research programmes

Open access
de Jong, Stefan P.L., Wardenaar, Tjerk, Horlings, Edwin·2016·Research Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.008

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 87 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Jong, S. P. L., Wardenaar, T., & Horlings, E.
Affiliations
  • PNO Consultants (Netherlands) (NL)
  • Rathenau Instituut (NL)
Venue
Research Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
45
Issue
7
Pages
1397-1409
ISSN
0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2344828007
Cited by
91
References
87
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5
FWCI
15.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research Policy (publishedVersion)
  • KNAW research portal (Royal Academy of Art and Sciences (KNAW)) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Dutch national research programme Knowledge for Climate
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Research, Science, and Academia
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Keywords
transdisciplinary research, social impact, agency theory, moral hazard, adverse selection, research program planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review