Cited by 26Mental Health Treatment and AccessMigration, Health and TraumaPsychiatric care and mental health services

Prevalence of psychiatric morbidity at Mobile Health Clinic in an urban community in North India

Abstract

Objective The objective was to estimate the prevalence of psychiatric morbidity amongst patients attending Mobile Health Clinic (MHC) in an urban community in South Delhi.Methods Adult subjects were recruited by systematic random sampling at outpatient MHC. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorder Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ) was used for screening, and Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) was used for the confirmation of diagnosis of psychiatric disorder of all PHQ-positive and 20% of PHQ-negative patients. Association of selected sociodemographic factors with psychiatric morbidity was also assessed.Results In total, 350 subjects were recruited, out of which 92 (26.3%) [95% confidence interval (CI) 21.7-31.0] were found to be PHQ positive. M.I.N.I. was administered to 141 subjects (92 PHQ positives and 52 PHQ negatives). Total estimated magnitude of psychiatric morbidity by M.I.N.I. was 25.4% (95% CI 20.9-29.9). Depression (15.7%) was observed to be the most common psychiatric disorder followed by generalized anxiety disorder (11.1%) and phobic disorders (10.1%). Suicidal ideation was reported by 37 (10.6%) patients. Literate status [odds ratio (OR)=0.43] and duration of migration >20 years to study area (OR=1.27) were found to be significantly associated with psychiatric morbidity.Conclusion In resource-poor country like India, high psychiatric morbidity at MHC justifies the use of MHC for providing outreach mental health services in difficult areas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2011.09.009

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The PHQ has previously been validated among South Asian populations and used in previous studies measuring the prevalence of depressive symptoms among various communities in India.

    “The PHQ has previously been validated among South Asian populations and used in previous studies measuring the prevalence of depressive symptoms among various communities in India.15–19”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salve, H., Goswami, K., Nongkynrih, B., Sagar, R., & Sreenivas, V.
Affiliations
All India Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Corresponding author
Salve, Harshal
Venue
General Hospital Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
121-126
ISSN
0163-8343 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026309810
Cited by
26
References
36
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • General Hospital Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
psychiatric morbidity, prevalence, mobile clinics, primary care mental health, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, phobia, suicidal ideation, sociodemographic risk factors, literacy, migration duration, urban communities, South Delhi
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Ambulatory Care, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, India, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Mobile Health Units, Surveys and Questionnaires, Urban Population, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review